Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, TBBills said:

Your post is all what ifs... Please prove it.

 

Just like the Russian investigation of a fake (Paid for) dossier which only took 2 yrs & $32 Million of tax payer money to prove nothing 🤔

 

If they gave that much time investigating a "Possible" political dealing with the last Pres. they should do the same for this incoming Pres. for which his son is known to have a relationship with the largest Communist country's biggest electric company .

 

I doubt that any of this will make sense because you will cherry pick what makes sense to your train of thought although it is futile i will at least make a attempt .

 

Oh & before you go spouting off show me the proof again i will tell you in this article there is no proof of any allegations of Joe being tied to China which i did not say but unlike the allegations of a fake/paid for dossier there is a proven connection to china which gives way to a line of thought that provokes a reason to why there might be some kind of investigation into the relationship between them.

 

 

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/joe-biden-must-clear-air-hunter-biden-his-china-business-ncna1245836

  • Like (+1) 1
  • 3 months later...
  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

 

 

 

In The Last Decade, 89% Of New CO2 Output Came From China And India 

 

https://hotair.com/archives/john-s-2/2021/03/01/last-decade-89-new-co2-output-came-china-india/

 

 

We’re being told on a daily basis that CO2 emissions need to drop in order to avoid a future climate disaster. We’re also being told that we’re not doing nearly enough. In fact, globally we’re not seeing any reduction in CO2 emissions. If you look at the decade leading up to 2018 those emissions went up about 12%. But there’s a very big caveat to those numbers. Nearly all of the increase, just shy of 90%, is coming from just two countries

 

 

So while we heard a lot about President Trump leaving the Paris Accord behind, the U.S. actually has been doing a pretty good job in reducing its emissions without it. But those efforts won’t mean much overall so long as China and India are more than making up for any reductions we’ve made. To put this another way, if you’re hoping to see a global reduction in CO2 emissions over the next decade it pretty much rests in the hands of one person:

 

 

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

In The Last Decade, 89% Of New CO2 Output Came From China And India 

 

https://hotair.com/archives/john-s-2/2021/03/01/last-decade-89-new-co2-output-came-china-india/

 

 

We’re being told on a daily basis that CO2 emissions need to drop in order to avoid a future climate disaster. We’re also being told that we’re not doing nearly enough. In fact, globally we’re not seeing any reduction in CO2 emissions. If you look at the decade leading up to 2018 those emissions went up about 12%. But there’s a very big caveat to those numbers. Nearly all of the increase, just shy of 90%, is coming from just two countries

 

 

So while we heard a lot about President Trump leaving the Paris Accord behind, the U.S. actually has been doing a pretty good job in reducing its emissions without it. But those efforts won’t mean much overall so long as China and India are more than making up for any reductions we’ve made. To put this another way, if you’re hoping to see a global reduction in CO2 emissions over the next decade it pretty much rests in the hands of one person:

 

xi-jinping.jpg

Just as importantly, the United States shouldn't need a global agreement with any other country to do what these people perceive to be the 'right thing'. 

 

Matthew 6:1-4

"Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.”

  • Like (+1) 2
  • 1 month later...
Posted

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-climate-change-town-hall-staffer-climate-fear

 

 

CNN plans climate change town hall after staffer reveals plan to sell climate 'fear' in leaked recording

by Yael Halon

 

CNN is set to host a live town hall with senior Biden administration officials this weekend on the topic of climate change, weeks after a network employee told an undercover journalist the network planned to push "fear" about the issue. The town hall, moderated by CNN anchor Dana Bash, will focus on "The Climate Crisis" and will air on Friday night to mark this year's celebration of Earth Day, the network announced.

 

 

Posted
On 3/2/2021 at 4:49 PM, SoCal Deek said:

Just as importantly, the United States shouldn't need a global agreement with any other country to do what these people perceive to be the 'right thing'. 

 

Matthew 6:1-4

"Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.”

Global agreements on pollution are pragmatic because you’re generally collaborating on disadvantaging yourselves economically in the short term.  

Posted
1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Global agreements on pollution are pragmatic because you’re generally collaborating on disadvantaging yourselves economically in the short term.  

We can improve the environment without handcuffing ourselves. We've been doing it for decades. But, I believe like you, I see no reason why we need global agreements to do it.  I trust the 'moral' compass of America, far more than I do that of virtually any other country.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

We can improve the environment without handcuffing ourselves. We've been doing it for decades. But, I believe like you, I see no reason why we need global agreements to do it.  I trust the 'moral' compass of America, far more than I do that of virtually any other country.

Fair but if you can get buy in from the others or commit to shared sacrifice it helps things, in my view.

 

I also think the whole climate change argument is misguided anyway because it’s complicated science and just allows the puppet masters to create more division.  
 

It should really just boil down to what do you want to breath?, what do you want to drink? What do you want to eat? I’m pretty sure an overwhelming majority would not say ‘the polluted stuff’ 

Posted
16 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Sorry Joe, this is NOT a function of the Federal Government.

 

EzsxcDXXEAMdKLq?format=jpg&name=medium

 

 

 

Between a max of 4 people on July 4th and 4 pounds per year this nitwit is going to ruin summer for the very docile. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Between a max of 4 people on July 4th and 4 pounds per year this nitwit is going to ruin summer for the very docile. 

Alright guys... let’s have a fair and balanced view here.

 

Hard core light winger, Lindsey Graham: 

 

 

 

 

Posted

 

28 minutes ago, Backintheday544 said:

Alright guys... let’s have a fair and balanced view here.

 

Hard core light winger, Lindsey Graham: 

 

 

 

 

Brother 5–have at it.  Hide in the cellar. Dim the lights.  Knit your own socks.  Send all your money to your betters to redistribute.  On the 4th, mask up, eat tofu and speak in hushed tones.  You’ll be saving us all.  

 

But be nicer on the comments regarding Lindsey G.  Humor at the expense of others creates negative energy that dents butterfly wings in the Arctic, which—you guessed it, contributes to the climate calamity that befalls us. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

 

Brother 5–have at it.  Hide in the cellar. Dim the lights.  Knit your own socks.  Send all your money to your betters to redistribute.  On the 4th, mask up, eat tofu and speak in hushed tones.  You’ll be saving us all.  

 

But be nicer on the comments regarding Lindsey G.  Humor at the expense of others creates negative energy that dents butterfly wings in the Arctic, which—you guessed it, contributes to the climate calamity that befalls us. 


I read this 5 times and I have no idea what you’re trying to say.

Posted
11 hours ago, Backintheday544 said:


I read this 5 times and I have no idea what you’re trying to say.

Of course you don’t.  
 

You’re just a sweet kid who doesn’t knit his own socks, preferring instead to order online using your personal squawk box constructed from petroleum products, buying from countries polluting Mother Earth at an alarming rate, using non-sustainable products, made in sweatshops by child/forced laborers working 12-15 hours a day, placed on trucks and cargo ships that chug across the vast oceans leaving a trail of destruction all along the way, placed on trucks that burn fossil fuel in and ultimately delivered to in a most decidedly eco-painful  packaging  that you will quickly cast off to our ever expanding landfills. 

 

Knit you own socks man. Save the planet. 
 

Be bold. Be Biden. 
 

 

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted

John Kerry Implies Net-Zero Emissions Goal Not Good Enough, Says We Need To ‘Get Carbon Dioxide Out Of The Atmosphere’

by Charlotte Pence Bond

 

At the virtual Leaders’ Climate Summit on Thursday, climate czar John Kerry made the claim that even if a goal of net-zero emissions is achieved, carbon dioxide will still need to be removed from the atmosphere. Kerry spoke through a screen as the summit was held on a virtual format, saying, “Even if we get to net zero, we still have to get carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. This is a bigger challenge than a lot of people have really grabbed onto yet.”

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/john-kerry-implies-net-zero-emissions-goal-not-good-enough-says-we-need-to-get-carbon-dioxide-out-of-the-atmosphere

 

 

John Kerry is an absolute moron..

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
10 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Of course you don’t.  
 

You’re just a sweet kid who doesn’t knit his own socks, preferring instead to order online using your personal squawk box constructed from petroleum products, buying from countries polluting Mother Earth at an alarming rate, using non-sustainable products, made in sweatshops by child/forced laborers working 12-15 hours a day, placed on trucks and cargo ships that chug across the vast oceans leaving a trail of destruction all along the way, placed on trucks that burn fossil fuel in and ultimately delivered to in a most decidedly eco-painful  packaging  that you will quickly cast off to our ever expanding landfills. 

 

Knit you own socks man. Save the planet. 
 

Be bold. Be Biden. 
 

 

 

Wait.... do you knit your own socks!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
Just now, B-Man said:

 

 

PREACH !

 

 

 

 

 

If after researching for yourself, and not being able to come up with an answer, you then went to 100 doctors, and 97 of them told you you will die if you don't follow their advice, what would you do?  

Posted
Just now, daz28 said:

If after researching for yourself, and not being able to come up with an answer, you then went to 100 doctors, and 97 of them told you you will die if you don't follow their advice, what would you do?  

 

Oh dear.

 

You aren't really going to quote that faux 97% narrative are you.

 

My doctor knows that science is never settled, that is not how it works.

 

And my accountant knows that throwing good money after bad, because many people have been force fed one sided data for two decades, is foolish.

 

 

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...