DC Tom Posted January 10, 2020 Posted January 10, 2020 Just now, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I rounded up. That's how you draw them in. Then you missed the entire point of the "100% accurate" post.
Foxx Posted January 10, 2020 Posted January 10, 2020 10 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Then you missed the entire point of the "100% accurate" post. you rounded down, didn't you?
John Adams Posted January 10, 2020 Posted January 10, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Gary Busey said: You're a moran. 1) You need to think of your own line. 2) If you're going to use it, it's, "Your a moran," moran. And whoever made that error is probably long gone. But I think he was really really short. Edited January 10, 2020 by John Adams
Warren Zevon Posted January 10, 2020 Posted January 10, 2020 3 minutes ago, John Adams said: 1) You need to think of your own line. 2) If you're going to use it, it's, "Your a moran," moran. And whoever made that error is probably long gone. But I think he was really really short. Whatever moran
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 10, 2020 Posted January 10, 2020 5 hours ago, DC Tom said: Then you missed the entire point of the "100% accurate" post. Or is that what I want you to think? (I probably missed it but numbers like yours make me nervous because of the potential for an infinite number of decimal places. It's unsettling, like Tom Hanks in Bosom Buddies)
DC Tom Posted January 10, 2020 Posted January 10, 2020 6 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Or is that what I want you to think? (I probably missed it but numbers like yours make me nervous because of the potential for an infinite number of decimal places. It's unsettling, like Tom Hanks in Bosom Buddies) You know, the mass of the electron has been calculated to some eleven decimal places...but only measured accurately to nine. That's how good the theory of the electron is: it's more accurate than we can accurately perceive.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted January 11, 2020 Posted January 11, 2020 4 hours ago, DC Tom said: You know, the mass of the electron has been calculated to some eleven decimal places...but only measured accurately to nine. That's how good the theory of the electron is: it's more accurate than we can accurately perceive. I’m torn between two answers: 1. Obviously. 2. Nice try. This isn’t over. 1
/dev/null Posted January 11, 2020 Posted January 11, 2020 23 hours ago, DC Tom said: 99.746% accurate. wasn't that also Hiliary Clinton's odds of becoming President?
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted January 11, 2020 Posted January 11, 2020 7 minutes ago, /dev/null said: wasn't that also Hiliary Clinton's odds of becoming President? same as Tibs & Busey odds for Trump re-election, right?..........
123719bwiqrb Posted January 11, 2020 Posted January 11, 2020 (edited) On 1/10/2020 at 10:34 AM, DC Tom said: Important point here... One of the easiest ways to tell you're being conned is artificial precision. People are more likely to believe precise statements than vague ones, so when lying, be precise. Conversely, if someone's being precise to you, question it, particularly if it's a future prediction or a statistical statement. That was really the point of this joke. When you see artificial precision, suspect nonsense. Like this one, oddly specific number there: "17 security agencies agree that Donald Trump is colluding the RUSSIA!!!!!!" - Hilldawg, Nov 2016 I believe one of them was the US Post Office or something. Edited January 11, 2020 by ScotSHO 1
Foxx Posted January 11, 2020 Posted January 11, 2020 (edited) it's settled science damnitall!!!!! shhh... but it's man made.... Edited January 11, 2020 by Foxx 1 1 1
Joe Miner Posted January 12, 2020 Posted January 12, 2020 7 hours ago, Foxx said: it's settled science damnitall!!!!! shhh... but it's man made.... Every corner of the Earth. Must have been a flat Earth newspaper. 1
Koko78 Posted January 13, 2020 Posted January 13, 2020 Greta strikes again! How dare Roger Federer take millions of dollars from a sponsor that provides loans to the fossil fuel industry! He should be more responsible. Though I can just picture the productive dialogue with his sponsor: Quote Roger Federer: Credit Suisse, we must talk about our environmental responsiblities! Credit Suisse: Absolutely, how can we help Mr. Federer? RF: Well, the next time you give me a multi-million dollar sponsorship check, how about we forego the paper check and just do direct deposit? CS: Not a problem, sir! We will save nearly 1/1024th of a tree that way! RF: Saving the environment just feels good. 1
B-Man Posted January 13, 2020 Posted January 13, 2020 GO AWAY, KID, YA BOTHER ME. Greta Snaps Over Demands: ‘We Want This Done Now – As In Right Now.’ Oh: “I want it now!” Related: Facebook Glitch Reveals Greta Thunberg’s Father Posting As Teenage Climate Activist. . 2
B-Man Posted January 13, 2020 Posted January 13, 2020 Facebook Bug Reveals Greta Thunberg's Posts Are Written by Her Father Left using children...........no surprise. Someone tell the Nobel Prize Committee . 3
/dev/null Posted January 13, 2020 Posted January 13, 2020 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Facebook Bug Reveals Greta Thunberg's Posts Are Written by Her Father Left using children...........no surprise. Someone tell the Nobel Prize Committee . Quote The edit history for Greta Thunberg’s page shows that the content has actually been written by her father, Svante Thunberg, and Adarsh Prathap, a climate activist in India who serves as a delegate at the UN’s Climate Change organization. So Activist-A serves as a delegate to a UN organization, and Activist-A is writing content for Activist-B to lobby the organization which Activist-A sits? Collusion anyone? 2
B-Man Posted January 13, 2020 Posted January 13, 2020 The Science is............... VIDEO: Hide The Decline: How Climate Change Data Was Faked. .
Wacka Posted January 13, 2020 Posted January 13, 2020 15 hours ago, B-Man said: GO AWAY, KID, YA BOTHER ME. Greta Snaps Over Demands: ‘We Want This Done Now – As In Right Now.’ Oh: “I want it now!” Related: Facebook Glitch Reveals Greta Thunberg’s Father Posting As Teenage Climate Activist. . Are we sure Greta isn’t about 50? I remember her being in Willy Wonka and the Chocoate Factory
/dev/null Posted January 13, 2020 Posted January 13, 2020 1 hour ago, Wacka said: Are we sure Greta isn’t about 50? I remember her being in Willy Wonka and the Chocoate Factory It's not that she's 50, Greta is a time traveler sent to save us from ourselves. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/nov/22/greta-thunberg-time-traveller-1891-photo 3
Recommended Posts