John Adams Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 2 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: So, you mean to say that the hole is closing without the help of humans? No, moran. 2 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: Doesn't that mean it could increase in size without the help of humans also? A bit of advice counselor, never ask a question without knowing the answer. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/2017GL074830
3rdnlng Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 6 minutes ago, John Adams said: No, moran. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/2017GL074830 Ah, a two year old article to bolster your contentions. Now, what were you trying to convey again? I made a post a few days ago referring to the fact that your dickiness is partially caused by your inability to state your case clearly and people misunderstand you because of it. You may be right or you may be wrong but you fail to state your case clearly enough for posters here to be able to have a genuine discussion with you. 1
TH3 Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 On 12/7/2019 at 10:48 AM, Foxx said: yeah but... i would be truly impressed if you had them on your electric sno-blower. yep, i have a net zero system myself. on a yearly basis, it provides all of my household electrical needs. unlike you however, i am only 4 years into the system that is expected to last 25 years minimum. with all of the rebates and incentives i was able to garner for the system and install, in two more years i will have recouped my out of pocket expenses, 100%. after that is when the payoff really kicks in. especially when you consider that it is forecast that energy prices are expected to rise 50% by the end of the next decade. Socialist 1
row_33 Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 56 minutes ago, John Adams said: No, moran. i like that! funny
bbb Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 53 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: your dickiness is partially caused by your inability to state your case clearly and people misunderstand you because of it. It might be that - or might be because he's a dick 1
3rdnlng Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 11 minutes ago, bbb said: It might be that - or might be because he's a dick Can't it be both?
snafu Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 https://time.com/person-of-the-year-2019-greta-thunberg/ I really try hard to stay out of this thread. Is this the appropriate place to post the TIME 2019 Person of the Year? It's that angry girl that people use as a climate change warrior puppet. I feel bad for her. 2
3rdnlng Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 24 minutes ago, snafu said: https://time.com/person-of-the-year-2019-greta-thunberg/ I really try hard to stay out of this thread. Is this the appropriate place to post the TIME 2019 Person of the Year? It's that angry girl that people use as a climate change warrior puppet. I feel bad for her. I don't. She could have been cast in this movie:
John Adams Posted December 12, 2019 Posted December 12, 2019 14 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: Ah, a two year old article to bolster your contentions. Now, what were you trying to convey again? I made a post a few days ago referring to the fact that your dickiness is partially caused by your inability to state your case clearly and people misunderstand you because of it. You may be right or you may be wrong but you fail to state your case clearly enough for posters here to be able to have a genuine discussion with you. The science that human behavior modification reversed the ozone depletion changed in the last two years? double moran Just because you want to march in a lockstep with a conclusion given to you by your peers doesn't mean that I do. Think for yourself. You might find yourself agreeing with the left and right.
/dev/null Posted December 12, 2019 Posted December 12, 2019 (edited) 12 hours ago, snafu said: https://time.com/person-of-the-year-2019-greta-thunberg/ I really try hard to stay out of this thread. Is this the appropriate place to post the TIME 2019 Person of the Year? It's that angry girl that people use as a climate change warrior puppet. I feel bad for her. It won't be long before the Left shifts their attentionto a new shiny bauble and Little Miss Temper Tantrum is forgotten. Or perhaps she may find one of her comments has drawn the ire of the Twitter Outrage Mob which then proceeds to #cancel her Edited December 12, 2019 by /dev/null 2
123719bwiqrb Posted December 12, 2019 Posted December 12, 2019 51 minutes ago, /dev/null said: It won't be long before the Left shifts their attentionto a new shiny bauble and Little Miss Temper Tantrum is forgotten. Or perhaps she may find one of her comments has drawn the ire of the Twitter Outrage Mob which then proceeds to #cancel her She is autistic, so she is immune to those attacks. I for one, welcome our new overlords. In celebration, I went out and did some snow donuts in my 3 ton vehicle while driving around a fire made entirely of styrofoam. You can thank me later. 2
SoCal Deek Posted December 12, 2019 Posted December 12, 2019 2 hours ago, /dev/null said: It won't be long before the Left shifts their attentionto a new shiny bauble and Little Miss Temper Tantrum is forgotten. Or perhaps she may find one of her comments has drawn the ire of the Twitter Outrage Mob which then proceeds to #cancel her I heard she bought a peloton! She’s toast. 1
3rdnlng Posted December 12, 2019 Posted December 12, 2019 11 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: I heard she bought a peloton! She’s toast. She needs a paddle boat to traverse the oceans on her quest for a fossil fuel free world. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted December 12, 2019 Posted December 12, 2019 Much more shameful of the people putting a 16 year old as the face of a movement like this. But when your brain has been broken, you’ll end up taking the wrong side more often than not. 2
row_33 Posted December 12, 2019 Posted December 12, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Much more shameful of the people putting a 16 year old as the face of a movement like this. But when your brain has been broken, you’ll end up taking the wrong side more often than not. a fake religion where they scream at everything you do, with no promise of an afterlife even.... 1
John Adams Posted December 12, 2019 Posted December 12, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Much more shameful of the people putting a 16 year old as the face of a movement like this. But when your brain has been broken, you’ll end up taking the wrong side more often than not. You can't even condemn this disgraceful behavior? Try to do it. What do you think of the president of the United States trolling a teenager?
row_33 Posted December 12, 2019 Posted December 12, 2019 and all the rich people trumpeting this fake religion are the worst offenders of pollution, the private jet being a major matter, but it's not about truth...
bbb Posted December 12, 2019 Posted December 12, 2019 I haven't thought about Roma Downey in a long time 1
Deranged Rhino Posted December 12, 2019 Posted December 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, John Adams said: You can't even condemn this disgraceful behavior? Try to do it. What do you think of the president of the United States trolling a teenager? I'm not making any comment on his statement. Just yours. Which is once again evidence of your broken brain. Your hatred of a man has blinded you to miss the forest through the trees (on every issue). She's being pimped out by her parents and a media complex to be a symbol of a divisive and purely political (these days) movement. The shame is on those people -- not the people who do EXACTLY what is expected in an information war. Your brain is broken. Trump beat you. And it's hilarious. 1
Recommended Posts