DC Tom Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: If only you applied that kind of discernment to the sources which lead you astray on Trump/Russia for three years... but you haven't yet. Bob complains Fox is biased, but gets all his medical info from Leafy.com. That's some real cognitive dissonance. 1
3rdnlng Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 Maybe Bob should ask the question why it takes Fox News to publish/report on the findings of the University of Chicago? Why wasn't this published by other networks? Is it because it doesn't fit their narrative? 1
Azalin Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 3 hours ago, Bob in Mich said: lol foxnews/science? nuff said on that link. No thanks. before you dismiss it out of hand, they link their source, which appears to be a legitimate website: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-019-0466-8.epdf?referrer_access_token=Y7yUsUFvo-m16rOmL2TEFtRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0NX4xEUiehCyMdAtpJNYXrMss1RvlDM2MgZl8rO6AJTtLu0AyRuiiEavs-5DYKjwNtgQP2kZFNeLsfKd6NNbhFByeRWaWmIH6KtU8FX1Ww4eNKAdvAM00t-KVVTrBNPwDPSegyW6tEw8WxRkCkWV93yXHZsUbxXiR2WAI1wg2OsW7J3C-QbhqO2zva7T850artRwoDnJOSE_89SDGWW_Fft&tracking_referrer=www.foxnews.com 1
Bob in Mich Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 3 hours ago, B-Man said: I have little interest in what Bob believes but this type of reaction always should be pointed out the actual research is by University of Chicago professors, but Bobby wouldn’t know that would he. He, and many others here, have no interest in trying to get any information that might challenge their predetermined bias Their posts should be judged accordingly Once lost, credibility is very tough to regain. Both FoxNews and you have lost credibility long ago. 1
3rdnlng Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 47 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Once lost, credibility is very tough to regain. Both FoxNews and you have lost credibility long ago. Bob, hard at work learning something: 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 5 hours ago, row_33 said: Fox sends out subliminal signals to stop being a shiftless pothead and do something with your brain for the first time in 25 years.... ...I believe the refrain would be, "easier said than done"........... 1
DC Tom Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 6 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...uh oh.....anybody have Al Gore on speed dial??.............. Explosion in Antarctic sea ice levels may cause another ice age By Chris Ciaccia | Fox News Upside-down "rivers" of warm ocean water may be one of the causes of Antarctica's ice shelves breaking up, leading to a rise in sea levels. But a new study suggests an increase in sea ice may lead to a much more devastating change in the Earth's climate — another ice age. Using computer simulations, the research suggests that an increase in sea ice could significantly alter the circulation of the ocean, ultimately leading to a reverse greenhouse effect as carbon dioxide levels in the ocean increase and levels in the air decrease. “One key question in the field is still what caused the Earth to periodically cycle in and out of ice ages,” University of Chicago professor and the study's co-author, Malte Jansen, said in a statement. “We are pretty confident that the carbon balance between the atmosphere and ocean must have changed, but we don’t quite know how or why." https://www.foxnews.com/science/explosion-antarctic-sea-ice-ice-age The interesting part of that story isn't that increased ice can cause global cooling. It's that the temperature drop can precede the drop in CO2 levels. That's a pretty big finding, that CO2 concentrations lag temperature.
Deranged Rhino Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Bob in Mich said: Once lost, credibility is very tough to regain. Both FoxNews and you have lost credibility long ago. Again, you'd think you'd apply the same standard to: ABC NBC CBS NYT WaPo All of whom promised the world for years that Trump committed actual treason with Russia to steal an election. We know that was a lie now. It's proven. Yet you're not dumping them... why? Oh... right, because you still think that Trump worked with Russia there just wasn't enough evidence to prove it. Because you've chosen to believe the words of PROVEN liars and manipulators because those same people convinced you Trump is the devil. Good luck with the next 5 years. You'll be lucky to survive it with what's left of your brain in tact.
row_33 Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 35 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...I believe the refrain would be, "easier said than done"........... sad, not even an influence to maybe read something by Herman Hesse.... 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 1 minute ago, row_33 said: sad, not even an influence to maybe read something by Herman Hesse.... ...he'd think that was a gas station with an "e' misspelling....like his truck collection..... 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Bob in Mich said: Once lost, credibility is very tough to regain. Both FoxNews and you have lost credibility long ago. In fairness, Bob, your perspective can be summarized as “I trust my guys implicitly, but your guys, nope.”. As Julius Cesar, Tony Soprano AND Big ***** found out, that can be a dangerous perspective to have. Fox was simply the middleman oops middle person oops centre-facilitatorxyrs of factual information for your consideration. Consider/reject as warranted, initiate peer review, table for future dialogue....but to flat out reject because of the source seems silly. In other words, don’t hate the playa, hate the game.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 2 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: In fairness, Bob, your perspective can be summarized as “I trust my guys implicitly, but your guys, nope.”. As Julius Cesar, Tony Soprano AND Big ***** found out, that can be a dangerous perspective to have. Fox was simply the middleman oops middle person oops centre-facilitatorxyrs of factual information for your consideration. Consider/reject as warranted, initiate peer review, table for future dialogue....but to flat out reject because of the source seems silly. In other words, don’t hate the playa, hate the game. ...isn't that THE norm?.....my extended family are all dyed in the wool Dems whose ONLY news source is CNN..it's gospel....haven't been to a family function in years because of it...no harm...no foul....
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 30, 2019 Posted October 30, 2019 (edited) 6 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...isn't that THE norm?.....my extended family are all dyed in the wool Dems whose ONLY news source is CNN..it's gospel....haven't been to a family function in years because of it...no harm...no foul.... For some, of course. It’s interesting to me that posters like Bob visit this site to engage, but would reject a study simply because Fox reported on it, but would likely cite it if popped up on HuffPo. I understand distrust, but I have to be honest, I’d have never found Shamwow, the My Pillow and my wife never would have gotten the 3 pack of the No Yank Tank for her birthday if I followed Bob’s logic. Heck my wife wanted jewelry but when you consider a tank that doesn’t bunch up, it was a no brainer for her 30th. Edited October 31, 2019 by leh-nerd skin-erd 1
Gary M Posted October 31, 2019 Posted October 31, 2019 HMMMMM https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/halloween-snowstorm-wallops-the-midwest/611593
Foxx Posted October 31, 2019 Posted October 31, 2019 i'm getting dizzy. i wish they would make up my mind. am i going to bake to death or freeze to death. https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1190001528662183936 1
Koko78 Posted November 1, 2019 Posted November 1, 2019 56 minutes ago, Foxx said: i'm getting dizzy. i wish they would make up my mind. am i going to bake to death or freeze to death. https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1190001528662183936 The answer is simple: Vote for Democrats so that they can starve you to death. 2 1
KD in CA Posted November 1, 2019 Posted November 1, 2019 13 hours ago, Gary M said: HMMMMM https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/halloween-snowstorm-wallops-the-midwest/611593 "Anywhere from 4 to 7 inches of snowfall had buried parts of Iowa by Thursday afternoon" So now Iowa can be "buried" in 4 inches of snow? "A record snowfall of 1.2 inches was recorded at Chicago O'Hare International Airport on Wednesday, smashing the old record..." Wow...a whole inch of snow in Chicago certain is SMASHING! How are they surviving??
Azalin Posted November 1, 2019 Posted November 1, 2019 35 minutes ago, KD in CA said: "Anywhere from 4 to 7 inches of snowfall had buried parts of Iowa by Thursday afternoon" So now Iowa can be "buried" in 4 inches of snow? Not so bad when you think of all the corn and wheat they're buried in all summer long.
SoCal Deek Posted November 1, 2019 Posted November 1, 2019 7 hours ago, Azalin said: Not so bad when you think of all the corn and wheat they're buried in all summer long. Wait a minute! I thought the corn was as high as an elephant’s eye! Or is the only in Oklahoma? 1
Recommended Posts