Jump to content

Global warming err Climate change HOAX


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

 

FIGHTING THE BLACKLIST

 

It appears that Nature Communications is already backpedaling:

You should be aware that, following a letter from me yesterday to Nature Communications, the “learned” journal in which the “peer-reviewed” “research” “study” that is the subject of your press release was published, that journal has removed all reference to the offending purported “study” from its homepage and has added to the page containing the purported “study” a paragraph indicating that it is investigating “a number of criticisms related to this work”, and has removed altogether the list of names of the alleged “deniers”, including my name.

With respect to climate, as on pretty much every other issue, the Left is losing the argument and responds by trying to silence those who point out the facts. The jury is still out on whether this will prove to be a winning strategy, but on this particular front, it appears that the bad guys are in retreat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The climate change crisis racket

by Taylor Day

 

Original Article

 

Do Democrats really believe in the climate crisis they have dubbed an "emergency," or is it really just a way to make a quick buck? Beto O'Rourke has suggested spending $5 trillion over the next ten years investing in climate change initiatives primarily for "vulnerable communities." Not to be outdone, Kamala Harris was one of the co-sponsors for the "Green New Deal," which proposes $700 billion a year in spending on a utopian garden future. Bernie Sanders, also a loud supporter of the GND, proposes going even farther and banning any new developments that would require fossil fuels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me put it to you all this way:

 

If the ice caps are melting at a rate that’ll end civilization in 11 years, there is less than ZERO chance there’s anything anyone, or everyone, can do ANYTHING about it now!  

 

These people are not serious people. They are hucksters. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Let me put it to you all this way:

 

If the ice caps are melting at a rate that’ll end civilization in 11 years, there is less than ZERO chance there’s anything anyone, or everyone, can do ANYTHING about it now!  

 

Ya think?  ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

The only dupes are the people who swallow all the oil companies paid for propaganda that science is fake. How stupid do you have to be? 

  Your kind of stupid.  That's how stupid.

37 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Ya think?  ?

  Tibs has his air conditioner aimed out from his apartment hoping that the winds blow the cold north.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  Your kind of stupid.  That's how stupid.

  Tibs has his air conditioner aimed out from his apartment hoping that the winds blow the cold north.

Are you one of the faithful who think the scientists are in a conspiracy about this? 

 

Thats stupid! The oil company money was well spent to tell you what to think. They talk, you walk 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

THE LEFT DISCOVERS ECO-FASCISM

 

How charming: the left has belatedly discovered something conservatives have known for 50 years or more—that environmentalism, especially in its dominant ideological forms, is prone to fascism.

 

Remember that “environmentalism” very quickly replaced “ecology”—the more generic scientific term—not long after the first Earth Day in 1970. Keep in mind that the left was initially indifferent or even hostile to “the ecology craze” (as some leftist critics called it at the time), but they soon figured out the potential for the issue. “Ecology,”New Republic writer James Ridgeway wrote, “offered liberal-minded people what they had longed for, a safe, rational and above all peaceful way of seeming to remake society . . . [and] developing a more coherent central state. . .” Except for the “safe, rational and peaceful” part, he was on to something! And people think it started with the Green Nude Eel.

 

For a good background to this, see Elizabeth Nickson’s book, Eco-Fascists, or this excerptfrom Rupert Darwall’s fine book Green Tyranny: Exposing the Totalitarian Roots of the Climate Industrial Complex.

 

It has always been considered bad form to point out that the German Nazis had a conscious environmental quotient to their ideology, but what’s this? The Washington Post noted yesterday that two of the recent mass shooters—the New Zealand shooter last year and the El Paso shooter two weeks ago—embraced environmental themes, fusing them together in fact with anti-immigration views.

 

The Post is shocked and befuddled at this seeming anomaly (though to be fair, the Post notes as briefly as possible: “Ecofascism has deep roots. There is a strong element of it in the Nazi emphasis on “blood and soil,” and the fatherland. . .) But this is only anomalous to clueless liberals, who suffer cognitive impairment when it comes to imagining the connection between the anti-natalism of the “population bomb” mentality and seeing immigration as a driver of population growth:

 

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

THE LEFT DISCOVERS ECO-FASCISM

 

How charming: the left has belatedly discovered something conservatives have known for 50 years or more—that environmentalism, especially in its dominant ideological forms, is prone to fascism.

 

Remember that “environmentalism” very quickly replaced “ecology”—the more generic scientific term—not long after the first Earth Day in 1970. Keep in mind that the left was initially indifferent or even hostile to “the ecology craze” (as some leftist critics called it at the time), but they soon figured out the potential for the issue. “Ecology,”New Republic writer James Ridgeway wrote, “offered liberal-minded people what they had longed for, a safe, rational and above all peaceful way of seeming to remake society . . . [and] developing a more coherent central state. . .” Except for the “safe, rational and peaceful” part, he was on to something! And people think it started with the Green Nude Eel.

 

For a good background to this, see Elizabeth Nickson’s book, Eco-Fascists, or this excerptfrom Rupert Darwall’s fine book Green Tyranny: Exposing the Totalitarian Roots of the Climate Industrial Complex.

 

It has always been considered bad form to point out that the German Nazis had a conscious environmental quotient to their ideology, but what’s this? The Washington Post noted yesterday that two of the recent mass shooters—the New Zealand shooter last year and the El Paso shooter two weeks ago—embraced environmental themes, fusing them together in fact with anti-immigration views.

 

The Post is shocked and befuddled at this seeming anomaly (though to be fair, the Post notes as briefly as possible: “Ecofascism has deep roots. There is a strong element of it in the Nazi emphasis on “blood and soil,” and the fatherland. . .) But this is only anomalous to clueless liberals, who suffer cognitive impairment when it comes to imagining the connection between the anti-natalism of the “population bomb” mentality and seeing immigration as a driver of population growth:

 

 

 

 

.

 

it's a religion without the central tenets of:

 

belief in a superior being

obeying the commands from this being provided by revelation

which usually requires love and kindness towards others, as we want for ourself

 

worse than communism

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...