Global warming err Climate change HOAX

[B-Man]

 

DNC Chairman Tom Perez was the opening act at last night’s Dem debate where he said “climate change threatens our universe.”

 

Yeah, we’re confused, too:

 

 

 

[DC Tom]

2 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

DNC Chairman Tom Perez was the opening act at last night’s Dem debate where he said “climate change threatens our universe.”

 

Yeah, we’re confused, too:

 

 

 

 

You know who's going to be really pissed to hear this?

 

[Taro T]

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

DNC Chairman Tom Perez was the opening act at last night’s Dem debate where he said “climate change threatens our universe.”

 

Yeah, we’re confused, too:

 

 

 

 

OK.  The Magellanic Clouds and the Andromeda Galaxy sure.  But how will fossil fuel consumption on Earth effect anything further out?  That seems a wee tad preposterous.

 

?

[bbb]

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

DNC Chairman Tom Perez was the opening act at last night’s Dem debate where he said “climate change threatens our universe.”

 

Yeah, we’re confused, too:

 

 

 

 

What do you want from a Canisius High grad?!?

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

....not to worry!!...the best and the brightest are convening to fix the problem.......two key developments though...

1. Al Gore has not arrived yet.

2. Epstein's jet is NOT on the tarmac.

 

Katy Perry, more stars attend Google summit on climate change in private jets, mega yachts

 

By Jessica Sager | Fox News

 

Google Camp is hosting the likes of former President Barack Obama, Prince Harry, Leonardo DiCaprio and Katy Perry in Sicily, Italy, to discuss climate change, but it may come at a steep cost to Mother Earth.

“Everything is about global warming, that is the major topic this year,” a source told the New York Post.

Sources told the outlet that the three-day event will cost the tech giant $20 million.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/google-summit-celebrities-climate-change

 

 

Edited July 31, 2019 by OldTimeAFLGuy

[Bakin]

On 7/25/2019 at 7:52 PM, jrober38 said:

 

I'm much more worried about wide spread drought and the mass migration of people that will move because of it than the melting of the polar ice caps.

First of all - no you aren’t. 

You aren’t worried about it. 

What are you doing about it?

 

in recorded history there has never been fewer deaths from climate related disasters than ever before. 

 

[Tiberius]

7 minutes ago, Bakin said:

First of all - no you aren’t. 

You aren’t worried about it. 

What are you doing about it?

 

in recorded history there has never been fewer deaths from climate related disasters than ever before. 

 

That's a facebook post? Lol, ok! Great source! Couldn't find something on twitter? 

[Bakin]

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

That's a facebook post? Lol, ok! Great source! Couldn't find something on twitter? 

It’s an easy chart for even the simple minded to grasp. 

Deaths are down 90%. 

Data is from EMDAT. 

Heres another source and link. 

https://ourworldindata.org/natural-disasters

[Tiberius]

1 minute ago, Bakin said:

It’s an easy chart for even the simple minded to grasp. 

Deaths are down 90%. 

Data is from EMDAT. 

Heres another source and link. 

https://ourworldindata.org/natural-disasters

still pointless. The government and scientists--two groups you hate--are doing a great job ameliorating threats to humanity, so now you are saying don't listen to them about this threat because they are doing a good job about threats from nature. What's your point? 

So I looked at the link and it points out Natural Disasters are increasing. Yet deaths are decreasing because government and science are good. 

[SoCal Deek]

2 hours ago, Tiberius said:

still pointless. The government and scientists--two groups you hate--are doing a great job ameliorating threats to humanity, so now you are saying don't listen to them about this threat because they are doing a good job about threats from nature. What's your point? 

So I looked at the link and it points out Natural Disasters are increasing. Yet deaths are decreasing because government and science are good. 

May I ask why you're using electricity then?  Why aren't you hunkered down in a hole in a forest somewhere?

[Bakin]

3 hours ago, Tiberius said:

still pointless. The government and scientists--two groups you hate--are doing a great job ameliorating threats to humanity, so now you are saying don't listen to them about this threat because they are doing a good job about threats from nature. What's your point? 

So I looked at the link and it points out Natural Disasters are increasing. Yet deaths are decreasing because government and science are good. 

Huh what???

deaths are decreasing because they are decreasing. In huge numbers.

yea, science is good. Technology is good. Government is ######ed. 

You think government is responsible for this?  

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

On 7/31/2019 at 1:23 PM, B-Man said:

 

DNC Chairman Tom Perez was the opening act at last night’s Dem debate where he said “climate change threatens our universe.”

 

Yeah, we’re confused, too:

 

 

 

 

...and to think if he was around "a bit earlier", PA and NY would still be covered under the ice cap........NY should STILL be frozen anyway.....

[Deranged Rhino]

The old tricks are the best tricks... 

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

20 hours ago, Bakin said:

It’s an easy chart for even the simple minded to grasp. 

Deaths are down 90%. 

Data is from EMDAT. 

Heres another source and link. 

https://ourworldindata.org/natural-disasters

Besides the fact that both lines are squiggly--scientifically impossible---note that if projected to 2030, the death rate soars to near nearly 9 billion per many of the top minds on the left.  It would not be a total extinction event, of course, a few people in Austraila and Denzel Washington will likely survive. 

 

This chart is bogus. 

[Bakin]

1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Besides the fact that both lines are squiggly--scientifically impossible---note that if projected to 2030, the death rate soars to near nearly 9 billion per many of the top minds on the left.  It would not be a total extinction event, of course, a few people in Austraila and Denzel Washington will likely survive. 

 

This chart is bogus. 

Which chart is bogus?

 

[Tiberius]

BOILING OVER

Published 08.05.19 

July 2019 Officially the Hottest Month in Recorded History

“This is not science fiction. It is the reality of climate change,” said Petteri Taalas, secretary general of the World Meteorological Organization.

[SoCal Deek]

I was watching Planet Earth the other night and saw the remains of a forest  and a huge lake that used to cover North Africa. It’s too bad cars had to come along and ruin it all! (We did have cars hundreds of years ago...right?)

[B-Man]

July 2019 Was Not the Warmest on Record

August 2nd, 2019 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.

 

July 2019 was probably the 4th warmest of the last 41 years. Global “reanalysis” datasets need to start being used for monitoring of global surface temperatures.

 

We are now seeing news reports (e.g. CNN, BBC, Reuters) that July 2019 was the hottest month on record for global average surface air temperatures.

One would think that the very best data would be used to make this assessment. After all, it comes from official government sources (such as NOAA, and the World Meteorological Organization [WMO]).

 

But current official pronouncements of global temperature records come from a fairly limited and error-prone array of thermometers which were never intended to measure global temperature trends. The global surface thermometer network has three major problems when it comes to getting global-average temperatures:

 

(1) The urban heat island (UHI) effect has caused a gradual warming of most land thermometer sites due to encroachment of buildings, parking lots, air conditioning units, vehicles, etc. These effects are localized, not indicative of most of the global land surface (which remains most rural), and not caused by increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Because UHI warming “looks like” global warming, it is difficult to remove from the data. In fact, NOAA’s efforts to make UHI-contaminated data look like rural data seems to have had the opposite effect. The best strategy would be to simply use only the best (most rural) sited thermometers. This is currently not done.

 

(2) Ocean temperatures are notoriously uncertain due to changing temperature measurement technologies (canvas buckets thrown overboard to get a sea surface temperature sample long ago, ship engine water intake temperatures more recently, buoys, satellite measurements only since about 1983, etc.)

 

(3) Both land and ocean temperatures are notoriously incomplete geographically. How does one estimate temperatures in a 1 million square mile area where no measurements exist?

 

There’s a better way.

 

More at the link: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/08/02/july-2019-was-not-the-warmest-on-record/

 

 

 

.

[Bob in Mich]

On 6/10/2019 at 11:41 AM, Tiberius said:

You guys are f'n morons 

great post!

 

bump

[Azalin]

13 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

great post!

 

bump

 

This is one of the lamest attempts at trolling I've ever seen.

 

And credit where credit is due - you don't hold a candle to Tiberius when it comes to trolling and you never will.