Tiberius Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 On 6/7/2019 at 10:27 AM, B-Man said: “Climate scientists” seem almost allergic to applying the scientific method to their claims about Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming. Here, as on so many other issues, it is President Trump who is right, and his ostensibly sophisticated critics who are wrong. You guys are f'n morons 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 How many times throughout the decades have we been told doom and gloom, the world is going to end, blah, blah, blah................. by scientists who tell us that if the human race doesn't stop what it is doing, the world is going to end? Yet, the world still stands and there is no threat in sight that the world is going to end because of humans, or anything else for that matter. Mother Nature is a volatile force that always has a habit of showing us how puny we really are. That is NEVER going to change no matter how much influence we try to enforce on her. Yet the insane left keeps up their useless rhetoric when it comes to climate change. Climate change is the biggest HOAX throughout my lifetime. FACT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 11 minutes ago, njbuff said: How many times throughout the decades have we been told doom and gloom, the world is going to end, blah, blah, blah................. by scientists who tell us that if the human race doesn't stop what it is doing, the world is going to end? Yet, the world still stands and there is no threat in sight that the world is going to end because of humans, or anything else for that matter. Mother Nature is a volatile force that always has a habit of showing us how puny we really are. That is NEVER going to change no matter how much influence we try to enforce on her. Yet the insane left keeps up their useless rhetoric when it comes to climate change. Climate change is the biggest HOAX throughout my lifetime. FACT. they laugh at Fundamentalists calling for the end of the world but they are far worse off thinking they have a scientific model to back them up, with no promise of heaven even Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njbuff Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 1 minute ago, row_33 said: they laugh at Fundamentalists calling for the end of the world but they are far worse off thinking they have a scientific model to back them up, with no promise of heaven even When I was a kid, I used to laugh at the scientists telling me that the world was going to end in 10 years because of climate change. In today's world, the left uses this garbage as a political talking point, starting with cow farts. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 CLIMATE CHANGE: WHAT CAN’T IT DO? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 6 minutes ago, row_33 said: they laugh at Fundamentalists calling for the end of the world but they are far worse off thinking they have a scientific model to back them up, with no promise of heaven even Fundamentalists aren't calling for the end of the world and never have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 I HAD BEEN ASSURED THIS HAD ALL BEEN SETTLED: Great Lakes Reveal a Fatal Flaw in Climate Change ‘Science.’ . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 19 minutes ago, B-Man said: I HAD BEEN ASSURED THIS HAD ALL BEEN SETTLED: Great Lakes Reveal a Fatal Flaw in Climate Change ‘Science.’ . Yeah, the fatal flaw has always been that the theory can't make any sort of coherent future prediction. As some of us have been saying for 20 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 A top White House official who has championed the environmental benefits of carbon dioxide apparently intervened to quash scientific research on the coming climate crisis. Basically, we have a bunch of older people that do not care what's going to happen after they die. That's really what the climate deniers are all about. 17 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Yeah, the fatal flaw has always been that the theory can't make any sort of coherent future prediction. As some of us have been saying for 20 years. Yup! So it's best to ignore it and/or suppress evidence because we don't know exactly how it will play out. It will be bad or really bad, wait and see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 31 minutes ago, DC Tom said: Yeah, the fatal flaw has always been that the theory can't make any sort of coherent future prediction. As some of us have been saying for 20 years. The only prediction Alarmists have been able to get right, is the rise in taxes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: Fundamentalists aren't calling for the end of the world and never have. in a way they are, some want to force Israel into war so Jesus can come back immediately.... you can't contain ALL of them.... in the early 1980s i heard from Fundamentalists how the world was going up in a nuclear holocaust, right through about 1984 when it didn't seem to be coming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 2 minutes ago, row_33 said: in a way they are, some want to force Israel into war so Jesus can come back immediately.... you can't contain ALL of them.... This is gator level bias. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 14 minutes ago, B-Man said: This is gator level bias. . He doesn't know what a "fundamentalist" is. He thinks James Jones or Reverend Moon were fundamentalists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 14 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: He doesn't know what a "fundamentalist" is. He thinks James Jones or Reverend Moon were fundamentalists. only you know what a Fundamentalist is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 1 minute ago, row_33 said: only you know what a Fundamentalist is Tibs doesn't even know that reading is fundamental to borrow from the 1970's PSA commercials. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 2 minutes ago, row_33 said: only you know what a Fundamentalist is No but every whack job is not a fundamentalist. 3 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: Tibs doesn't even know that reading is fundamental to borrow from the 1970's PSA commercials. Careful now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 4 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: No but every whack job is not a fundamentalist. Careful now. Big difference in reading simple text here and reading a scientific journal. Everybody thinks that they just became an expert because they just choked down the opening paragraph in an article and the concluding or summation paragraph but that is often not the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 21 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: No but every whack job is not a fundamentalist. . and only you can make that distinction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 3 minutes ago, row_33 said: and only you can make that distinction No, you are the one that is taking every whack job and calling them a fundamentalist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted June 10, 2019 Share Posted June 10, 2019 4 hours ago, RochesterRob said: Big difference in reading simple text here and reading a scientific journal. Everybody thinks that they just became an expert because they just choked down the opening paragraph in an article and the concluding or summation paragraph but that is often not the case. That's Bob in Michigan. He reads the first paragraph in a leafy.com article and he's an expert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts