Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 hours ago, /dev/null said:

             When I read anything about energy the first thing I want to know is, how efficient is the process.  Sadly no numbers here.  But that and the recent "60 minutes" where an inventor can turn plant tissue into energy indicate there are some interesting advancements coming down the pike.  I wonder how long the pike is?

  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
3 hours ago, Greybeard said:

             When I read anything about energy the first thing I want to know is, how efficient is the process.  Sadly no numbers here.  But that and the recent "60 minutes" where an inventor can turn plant tissue into energy indicate there are some interesting advancements coming down the pike.  I wonder how long the pike is?

 

It's not as efficient as it seems.  The initial energy costs to set up are high.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Rob's House said:

The more I think about it the more I'm convinced that Democrats don't believe in man-made global warming theory.

 

What?!? Of course they do. There's CONSENSUS, for God's sake! The only way to combat this terror is to completely transform our society into a socialist utopia where the rich pay for everything, and those unwilling to work are set for life!

 

If we don't radically redistribute the world's wealth immediately, we're all going to, like, you know, like, totally, like, actually, literally, like, die!

Posted
7 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

It's not as efficient as it seems.  The initial energy costs to set up are high.

and the cost of adding solar panels to every roof and turning every building into whatever the hell kind of energy efficiency they dream up isn't?

Posted
Just now, Cinga said:

and the cost of adding solar panels to every roof and turning every building into whatever the hell kind of energy efficiency they dream up isn't?

 

What the ***** does that have to do with what I said?

Posted
2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

What the ***** does that have to do with what I said?

Is the discussion about recapturing CO2? Did you not say it wasn't cost efficient?

Posted
4 minutes ago, Cinga said:

Is the discussion about recapturing CO2? Did you not say it wasn't cost efficient?

 

I said it wasn't as efficient as it seems. 

 

Nowhere did I do a cost-benefit analysis or compare it to anything else.  I just clarified that the "magic bullet" news reports are, as usual, bull####.

Posted
20 minutes ago, Nanker said:

That’s becoming a huge issue around the country and the world. 

Time to go Back to the Future and start using garbage to fuel the flux capacitor in our cars! Someone please check with AOC and see if she’ll allow it.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

 

I suspect that if you did the math, you'd find that the implementation of "meatless Mondays" has a larger carbon footprint than keeping things the same.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

the implementation of meatless mondays and other proposed remedies to global warming climate change chaos disruption are less about carbon and more about control

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, /dev/null said:

the implementation of meatless mondays and other proposed remedies to global warming climate change chaos disruption are less about carbon and more about control

 

They'll still serve milk though.  And ketchup.

 

In fact, the Monday menu could be nothing but milk and ketchup, and be considered a balanced meal.

Posted
51 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I suspect that if you did the math, you'd find that the implementation of "meatless Mondays" has a larger carbon footprint than keeping things the same.

Of course it is! Your eating the crap that absorbs the damn carbon!

Posted
On 3/6/2019 at 10:33 PM, Hedge said:

 

 

 

This has been coming for a while.  Our single stream recycling bin is disgusting;  can’t imagine what it looks like by the time it gets to China and the milk carton is covered in mold.

 

I remember the early days of recycling when you bundled newspapers (now replaced with cardboard thanks to Amazon) and carefully rinsed bottles/cans.  Maybe we need to go back to those days instead of thinking we can recycle anything.

Posted
On 3/11/2019 at 7:51 PM, LABillzFan said:

 

It's more power, more control over what you can and can't do, isn't this the same city that says you can't buy a big gulp? It's just another example of big government,  why anyone would want that is beyond me.

×
×
  • Create New...