B-Man Posted October 23, 2018 Posted October 23, 2018 For those who missed it on the last page, thanks to Gator's ?️ Why do Climate Advocates Sometimes Misrepresent What Skeptics Believe? .
Tiberius Posted October 23, 2018 Posted October 23, 2018 1 hour ago, /dev/null said: So does wubalubadubdub Great
Foxx Posted October 24, 2018 Posted October 24, 2018 https://twitter.com/politico/status/1055165287513907204
DC Tom Posted October 25, 2018 Posted October 25, 2018 6 hours ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/politico/status/1055165287513907204 They're suing on the charge that Exxon defrauded shareholders by denying global warming...after years of insisting they denied global warming to increase profits for the benefit of shareholders. ***** stupid. 1
Tiberius Posted October 25, 2018 Posted October 25, 2018 9 hours ago, DC Tom said: They're suing on the charge that Exxon defrauded shareholders by denying global warming...after years of insisting they denied global warming to increase profits for the benefit of shareholders. ***** stupid. They lied to their shareholders, right?
B-Man Posted October 30, 2018 Posted October 30, 2018 Moving The Goalposts: IPCC Secretly Redefines what ‘Climate’ means Anthony Watts / 19 hours ago October 29, 2018 From the “watch the pea under the thimble” department, the IPCC appears to have secretly changed the definition of what constitutes ‘climate’ by mixing existing and non-existing data By Dr. David Whitehouse, The GWPF The definition of ‘climate’ adopted by the World Meteorological Organisation is the average of a particular weather parameter over 30 years. It was introduced at the 1934 Wiesbaden conference of the International Meteorological Organisation (WMO’s precursor) because data sets were only held to be reliable after 1900, so 1901 – 1930 was used as an initial basis for assessing climate. It has a certain arbitrariness, it could have been 25 years. For its recent 1.5°C report the IPCC has changed the definition of climate to what has been loosely called “the climate we are in.” It still uses 30 years for its estimate of global warming and hence climate – but now it is the 30 years centred on the present. There are some obvious problems with this hidden change of goalposts. We have observational temperature data for the past 15 years but, of course, none for the next 15 years. However, never let it be said that the absence of data is a problem for inventive climate scientists. Global warming is now defined by the IPCC as a speculative 30-year global average temperature that is based, on one hand, on the observed global temperature data from the past 15 years and, on the other hand, on assumed global temperatures for the next 15 years Oh, c'mon ! .
Koko78 Posted October 30, 2018 Posted October 30, 2018 28 minutes ago, B-Man said: For its recent 1.5°C report the IPCC has changed the definition of climate to what has been loosely called “the climate we are in.” It still uses 30 years for its estimate of global warming and hence climate – but now it is the 30 years centred on the present. There are some obvious problems with this hidden change of goalposts. We have observational temperature data for the past 15 years but, of course, none for the next 15 years. However, never let it be said that the absence of data is a problem for inventive climate scientists. Global warming is now defined by the IPCC as a speculative 30-year global average temperature that is based, on one hand, on the observed global temperature data from the past 15 years and, on the other hand, on assumed global temperatures for the next 15 years Gee, you'd almost think that they're trying to manipulate the numbers because the real data doesn't support their doomsday 'we need more grant money and to institute global wealth redistribution' scenarios.
Gary M Posted October 31, 2018 Posted October 31, 2018 On 10/24/2018 at 11:37 PM, DC Tom said: They're suing on the charge that Exxon defrauded shareholders by denying global warming...after years of insisting they denied global warming to increase profits for the benefit of shareholders. ***** stupid. "The basis for the lawsuit rests on the idea of “stranded assets,” and whether companies will be forced to leave oil, natural gas and coal in the ground because of tightening regulations around greenhouse gases. " They are suing them because they did not detail the risks to the investors of the continuing government strangle hold on them.
IDBillzFan Posted November 1, 2018 Posted November 1, 2018 Hey, you global warming cooling climate change nutbags...do me a favor...yell all you want and bark all you want, but stop trying to tell me what to eat. Same goes for you vegans.
Gavin in Va Beach Posted November 1, 2018 Posted November 1, 2018 Climate change is like that Henny Youngman (or was it Jackie Mason) joke - "Dr said I had 2 months to live. At the end of 2 months I couldn't pay my bill, so he gave me 2 more months." 1
B-Man Posted November 1, 2018 Posted November 1, 2018 Henny Youngman Alert.............................. A man goes to a psychiatrist. The doctor says, ''You're crazy.'' The man says, ''I want a second opinion!'' ''O.K., you're ugly, too!'' A guy says to a doctor, ''I'm having trouble with my love life at home.'' The doctor says, ''Take off 20 pounds and run 10 miles a day for two weeks.'' Two weeks later, the guy calls the doctor, ''Doctor, I took off 20 pounds and I've been running 10 miles a day.'' ''How's your love life now?'' ''I don't know, I'm 140 miles away!'' .
B-Man Posted November 1, 2018 Posted November 1, 2018 (edited) Here’s PETA and Bloomberg saying we must give up meat immediately to halt climate change When the UN speaks, we listen … and when PETA speaks, we really listen: Quote Happy #WorldVeganDay PETA ✔@peta WE CANNOT FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE WITHOUT CUTTING OUT MEAT A study for the @UN says meat consumption has to decrease by as much as 90 PERCENT if we’re going to halt #ClimateChange. https://www.peta.org/blog/united-nations-climate-change-report-says-slashing-meat-consumption-necessary/?utm_source=PETA::Twitter&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=1018::veg::PETA::Twitter::Climate%20Change%20Eating%20Meat::::tweet … 5:02 PM - Oct 27, 2018 United Nations: To Halt Climate Change, Stop Eating Meat | PETA Beef consumption has to decrease by 90 percent if we're going to halt climate change, says the most comprehensive study ever conducted. peta.org And as LA posted above Bloomberg News had a "Note for all Carnivores" They also posted this................. Quote Bloomberg Opinion ✔@bopinion Governments and the food industry have a responsibility to help steer citizens and consumers towards a more plant-based, sustainable diet.http://bloom.bg/2QbNXP8 12:26 PM - Nov 1, 2018 Hear that? The government has a responsibility to “steer citizens and consumers” toward a plant-based diet — it’s amazing the things we missed in civics class. Edited November 1, 2018 by B-Man
DC Tom Posted November 1, 2018 Posted November 1, 2018 10 minutes ago, B-Man said: Here’s PETA and Bloomberg saying we must give up meat immediately to halt climate change When the UN speaks, we listen … and when PETA speaks, we really listen: United Nations: To Halt Climate Change, Stop Eating Meat | PETA Beef consumption has to decrease by 90 percent if we're going to halt climate change, says the most comprehensive study ever conducted. peta.org And as LA posted above Bloomberg News had a "Note for all Carnivores" They also posted this................. Hear that? The government has a responsibility to “steer citizens and consumers” toward a plant-based diet — it’s amazing the things we missed in civics class. Alternate theory: Bloomberg, instead of pushing veganism, made the editorial decision to give PETA a platform to show the world how batshit crazy they are. And my diet is plant-based: I eat nothing that doesn't eat plants.
Koko78 Posted November 1, 2018 Posted November 1, 2018 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Here’s PETA and Bloomberg saying we must give up meat immediately to halt climate change When the UN speaks, we listen … and when PETA speaks, we really listen: United Nations: To Halt Climate Change, Stop Eating Meat | PETA Beef consumption has to decrease by 90 percent if we're going to halt climate change, says the most comprehensive study ever conducted. peta.org And as LA posted above Bloomberg News had a "Note for all Carnivores" They also posted this................. Hear that? The government has a responsibility to “steer citizens and consumers” toward a plant-based diet — it’s amazing the things we missed in civics class. How are we going to stop the horrific and unreasonable release of methane into the air, causing global warming climate change, if we allow the cows releasing the offending farts to live? Meat is safety! Meat is salvation!
Foxx Posted November 1, 2018 Posted November 1, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Koko78 said: How are we going to stop the horrific and unreasonable release of methane into the air, causing global warming climate change, if we allow the cows releasing the offending farts to live? Meat is safety! Meat is salvation! we need to stop them in their tracks or it won't be long before.... Edited November 1, 2018 by Foxx
unbillievable Posted November 2, 2018 Posted November 2, 2018 (edited) Floods? Hurricanes? Earthquakes? What really matters is beer! Most of the crops that go into making beer will not survive extreme weather caused by global warming. Quote As temperature and weather patterns change, some of the crops most vital to beer’s creation, such as hops and malting barley, are threatened by inconsistent changes in weather. If you want people to care, hit them where it hurts. On 10/15/2018 at 2:53 PM, /dev/null said: I've never gotten swept up in the Global Warming / Climate Change hype before, but this report is really scary: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/zm95v4/climate-change-will-cause-beer-shortages-and-price-hikes-study-says Edited November 2, 2018 by unbillievable
B-Man Posted November 8, 2018 Posted November 8, 2018 Climate Change Alarmists Suffer Huge Blow In Deep Blue Washington State Original Article .
Tiberius Posted November 8, 2018 Posted November 8, 2018 Democrats are like the Whigs and Republicans in 1860's. They know this is the most important issue facing the country but can't say it. All, or the vast majority, of informed Democrats know that fossil fuels, like slavery, has to go. But they can't say that.
DC Tom Posted November 8, 2018 Posted November 8, 2018 5 hours ago, Tiberius said: Democrats are like the Whigs and Republicans in 1860's. They know this is the most important issue facing the country but can't say it. All, or the vast majority, of informed Democrats know that fossil fuels, like slavery, has to go. But they can't say that. And there we go. The Stupidest Thing I'll Read All Day. 1
/dev/null Posted November 8, 2018 Posted November 8, 2018 22 minutes ago, DC Tom said: And there we go. The Stupidest Thing I'll Read All Day. at least you made it past lunch this time
Recommended Posts