Jump to content

Global warming err Climate change HOAX


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This is a PSA: 

 

This issue is totally dead politically. Any further discussion of this issue is an utter waste of time, since it is politically dead. One can tell it's politically dead by mere observation: nobody of importance is talking about it, not even Nancy Pelosi. Democrats: be careful what you wish for. You want this issue to be dead, because you REALLY don't want team Trump to start digging up who got what grant $, for what purpose, check for fraud, start prosecutions, and then? Haul in sitting Senators, Congressman, and people from Obama's admin, and ask tough questions like "why did you authorize this expenditure"? You kick that hornet's nest at your own peril. Far better for you to leave this pile of crap as it is: dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

There really is precisely no evidence of an ongoing planetary warming.

 

There is just the deliberate misinterpretation of the Urban Heat Sink Effect on the Surface Ground Temp Series, and the rest is all fudge and fraud.

 

Don't forget plate tectonics...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plate tectonics, more precisely the position of land on the planet, that is what "dictates" Earth's climate and "change."

 

Hence, one could define "global warming" as "net loss of land in the polar circles due to tectonic plate movement," because that is what causes Earth to warm.

Edited by LaDexter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, we are only burning up the planet, so who cares...

 

Quote

 

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration, taking its third major step this year to roll back federal efforts to fight climate change, is preparing to make it significantly easier for energy companies to release methane into the atmosphere.

Methane, which is among the most powerful greenhouse gases, routinely leaks from oil and gas wells, and energy companies have long said that the rules requiring them to test for emissions were costly and burdensome.

The Environmental Protection Agency, perhaps as soon as this week, plans to make public a proposal to weaken an Obama-era requirement that companies monitor and repair methane leaks, according to documents reviewed by The New York Times. In a related move, the Interior Department is also expected in coming days to release its final version of a draft rule, proposed in February, that essentially repeals a restriction on the intentional venting and “flaring,” or burning, of methane from drilling operations.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/10/climate/methane-emissions-epa.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, donbb said:

I read page 171 of this thread. Seems about as dumb as 98% of the other threads on PPP. A bunch of idiots arguing faith over science. Get bent, dillweeds.

The scientists, like all the journalists, the FBI, Justice Department, the corporations that own the media and the rest of the world outside the United States heartland are all conspiring against white America. It's a fact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

The scientists, like all the journalists, the FBI, Justice Department, the corporations that own the media and the rest of the world outside the United States heartland are all conspiring against white America. It's a fact. 

 

Who is not in on the conspiracy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, donbb said:

I read page 171 of this thread. Seems about as dumb as 98% of the other threads on PPP. A bunch of idiots arguing faith over science. Get bent, dillweeds.

 

What, you want the rest of us to argue "faith" like you "consensus" idiots do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

What, you want the rest of us to argue "faith" like you "consensus" idiots do?

That's right! There are scientists out there that do not agree with the vast majority, therefore we should just burn up the planet! Good point, douche bag! ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiberius said:

That's right! There are scientists out there that do not agree with the vast majority, therefore we should just burn up the planet! Good point, douche bag! ?

 

That is not what I posted, and a faith-based argument as well, for being ignorantly Manichaeist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...