Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
1 minute ago, LaDexter said:

 

 

Oh, the horrors of noticing the SAME BEACH 50 years later has experienced precisely NO OCEAN RISE.... never mind Plymouth Rock, which has 400 years.... of no ocean rise.

 

 

 

REALLY....  they are close enough for the angle of descent to start sinking the islands.  Tectonic plates do not bend at 90 degree angles.  There is a slope, and it extends hundreds of miles from the actual fault.... but the quickie diagrams just show an almost 90 degree bend, so that's what DC Tom thinks is "real."

 

 

 

 

 

Image result for subduction
 
 
 
 
 
Re

 

So you're citing Hawaii 5-0 and a coloring book as evidence?  God, you're a hoot.  :lol:

 

The Marshall islands are about 1500 miles from the nearest seismically active location.  You're claiming the equivalent of the Puerto Rican trench causing Charleston SC to sink.  

 

You're retarded.  Stop being retarded.  Be something else.

Posted
2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

The Marshall islands are about 1500 miles from the nearest seismically active location.

 

 

No, they are less than 300 miles from the Pacific Ring of Fire.... where one plate goes under the other... duh...

 

 

Image result for marshall islands
 
 
 
4 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

You're claiming the equivalent of the Puerto Rican trench causing Charleston SC to sink.  

 

 

There is no subduction in the Atlantic.  The Atlantic Ocean is growing.  Nobody fears a tsunami in Miami, because the tectonic formation needed to produce one is simply not there...

Posted
10 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

 

 

No, they are less than 300 miles from the Pacific Ring of Fire.... where one plate goes under the other... duh...

 

 

Image result for marshall islands
 
 
 

 

 

There is no subduction in the Atlantic.  The Atlantic Ocean is growing.  Nobody fears a tsunami in Miami, because the tectonic formation needed to produce one is simply not there...

 

 

okay.....  ?

Posted
22 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

 

 

No, they are less than 300 miles from the Pacific Ring of Fire.... where one plate goes under the other... duh...

 

 

No, they're about 1500 miles from the nearest seismically active region - either the Bougainville Trench or the New Hebridies Trench.  There are no nearer subduction zones.

 

23 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

There is no subduction in the Atlantic.  The Atlantic Ocean is growing.  Nobody fears a tsunami in Miami, because the tectonic formation needed to produce one is simply not there...

 

PUERTO RICO TRENCH.  Also, the Cayman Trench, and Lesser Antilles subduction zone.

 

Jesus, you're an idiot.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

Document a single tsunami coming from that fault.....

 

LOL!!!!

 

Start the Jeopardy! music....

 

how on earth is this a hyper-concern of yours?

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, LaDexter said:

Document a single tsunami coming from that fault.....

 

LOL!!!!

 

Start the Jeopardy! music....

 

That's not the definition of "subduction zone."

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, row_33 said:

how on earth is this a hyper-concern of yours?

 

 

I am a patriotic American who values truth and doesn't want the US taxpayer to waste tens of billions $$$ each year to pay liars to fudge data...

Posted
Just now, row_33 said:

 

how on earth is this a hyper-concern of yours?

 

 

 

Because he's invested in proving me wrong.

 

Wacky fun... :lol:

Posted
Just now, DC Tom said:

That's not the definition of "subduction zone."

 

 

It is for an ACTIVE one...

 

The Pacfic Ring of Fire produced the Japan tsunami a decade or so ago...

 

Tsunamis are produced when one plate lurches under the other, "shrinking the bathtub..."

Posted
Just now, LaDexter said:

 

 

I am a patriotic American who values truth and doesn't want the US taxpayer to waste tens of billions $$$ each year to pay liars to fudge data...

 

You should work on "facts" before you attempt something as abstract as "truth."

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, DC Tom said:

You should work on "facts"

 

 

 

This from a Hebrew speaking Zionist Traitor who has spent the last 18 years spending his investment gains from having insider info that Jews were doing 911 before they did, and then has been here for 18 years shouting down truthers and lying about the Pentagon....

Posted
Just now, LaDexter said:

 

 

It is for an ACTIVE one...

 

The Pacfic Ring of Fire produced the Japan tsunami a decade or so ago...

 

Tsunamis are produced when one plate lurches under the other, "shrinking the bathtub..."

 

No, it's not.  They're called "subduction zones," not "tsunami zones."

 

But if that's your definition, then...Tenerife has caused tsunamis.  As has the Azores-Gibraltar fault.

3 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

 

 

 

This from a Hebrew speaking Zionist Traitor who has spent the last 18 years spending his investment gains from having insider info that Jews were doing 911 before they did, and then has been here for 18 years shouting down truthers and lying about the Pentagon....

 

Yeah, you really should work on "facts" first... :lol:

Posted

It is entirely possible that small subduction zones exist all over.  That doesn't change the basic equation of Earth's crust, which is that the Atlantic is growing, and the Pacific is shrinking...

 

 

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

Tenerife has caused tsunamis.  As has the Azores-Gibraltar fault

 

 

link?

 

A 2 centimeter tsunami is still a tsunami, but....

Posted
Just now, LaDexter said:

It is entirely possible that small subduction zones exist all over.  That doesn't change the basic equation of Earth's crust, which is that the Atlantic is growing, and the Pacific is shrinking...

 

 

 

 

link?

 

A 2 centimeter tsunami is still a tsunami, but....

 

!@#$ing seriously?  You've never heard of Lisbon?

Posted
1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

Not on the Ring of Fire, either.  

 

God, you two are !@#$ing stupid.  You and LaDexter are made for each other.

You are a POS.

 

 

Posted

All three of the "warmers" sinking island chains are within 300 miles of the PROF and on the subduction side....

 

coincidence??

 

LOL!!!!

Posted
11 minutes ago, LaDexter said:

All three of the "warmers" sinking island chains are within 300 miles of the PROF and on the subduction side....

 

coincidence??

 

LOL!!!!

 

No, they are not.  What, are you a flat earther, too?

Posted

Put up a map then and document that.

 

Where are the Solomons?

 

A: right on the "lip" of the PROF on the subduction side.... just like the Marshalls

×
×
  • Create New...