Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
54 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Wait, only man can make the climate change - there's consensus!

 

This reverse global warming climate change nonsense like the so-called 'little ice age' never happened. It's not like climate is a very complex cyclical system of atmospheric interactions that are affected by any number of extraterrestrial stimuli as well as internal stimuli.

 

289pwk.jpg

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Replies 7.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Actual NYT headline.

 

Climate Change Denialists Say Polar Bears Are Fine. Scientists Are Pushing Back.

Sure, the honest headline on that story would have been "Scientists Disagree About Prospects For Polar Bears", but this is the New York Times. If you expect balanced coverage from the NYT ... well you might check the classifieds to see if the Brooklyn Bridge is still for sale.

The issues raised in the Times article were discussed in the Watts Up With That blog yesterday: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/04/11/pushing-back-against-the-stupidest-scientific-paper-ever-published/ -- "Stupidest Scientific Paper Ever Published" should not be treated as a challenge to be surpassed.

 

.

Posted
39 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Actual NYT headline.

 

Climate Change Denialists Say Polar Bears Are Fine. Scientists Are Pushing Back.

Sure, the honest headline on that story would have been "Scientists Disagree About Prospects For Polar Bears", but this is the New York Times. If you expect balanced coverage from the NYT ... well you might check the classifieds to see if the Brooklyn Bridge is still for sale.

The issues raised in the Times article were discussed in the Watts Up With That blog yesterday: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/04/11/pushing-back-against-the-stupidest-scientific-paper-ever-published/ -- "Stupidest Scientific Paper Ever Published" should not be treated as a challenge to be surpassed.

 

.

 

So having read all that, to summarize: a bunch of morons published "peer reviewed research" that is nothing more than "Waaaah!  Someone disagrees with us!"  And that someone who disagrees with them refuted their "stupidest scientific paper ever published" (which it pretty much is), with an unpublished, unreviewed paper of her own (which might be the stupidest rebuttal ever published).  And the NYT decided to write a piece with a core thesis of "My retard's better than your retard."

 

When did the real world turn in to PPP?

Posted
2 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

When did the real world turn in to PPP?

 

Hmmm....assigning media outlets to PPP posters, now there’s an idea.

 

Gatortard is clearly HuffPo, not sure who’s NYT.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
12 hours ago, KD in CA said:

 

So what attributed to the Little Ice Age?  Was it.....gasp.....climate change????

Volcanoes and solar activity. 

12 hours ago, Koko78 said:

 

Wait, only man can make the climate change - there's consensus!

 

This reverse global warming climate change nonsense like the so-called 'little ice age' never happened. It's not like climate is a very complex cyclical system of atmospheric interactions that are affected by any number of extraterrestrial stimuli as well as internal stimuli.

STOP!!! You’re obfuscating with details and facts. FASCIST!!!

6 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

So having read all that, to summarize: a bunch of morons published "peer reviewed research" that is nothing more than "Waaaah!  Someone disagrees with us!"  And that someone who disagrees with them refuted their "stupidest scientific paper ever published" (which it pretty much is), with an unpublished, unreviewed paper of her own (which might be the stupidest rebuttal ever published).  And the NYT decided to write a piece with a core thesis of "My retard's better than your retard."

 

When did the real world turn in to PPP?

Oh, it’s always been weird. It’s just getting more so. 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Foxx said:

don't these talking monkees know that Eden has enough to go around.....

 

Did you just misspell "monkeys," or are you really referring to Mickey Dolenz, Peter Tork, Davy Jones, etc.

 

(Side note: which is sadder, knowing all four Monkees, or only three of them?)

Posted
47 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Did you just misspell "monkeys," or are you really referring to Mickey Dolenz, Peter Tork, Davy Jones, etc.

 

(Side note: which is sadder, knowing all four Monkees, or only three of them?)

 

 

Only three........

 

Since Mike Nesmith had the most talent

Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Did you just misspell "monkeys," or are you really referring to Mickey Dolenz, Peter Tork, Davy Jones, etc.

 

(Side note: which is sadder, knowing all four Monkees, or only three of them?)

silly monkees... give them thumbs, they make a club, and beat their brother down.

Edited by Foxx
Posted
27 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Only three........

 

Since Mike Nesmith had the most talent

 

Tork was easily the best musician of them

Posted
19 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

Tork was easily the best musician of them

 

Now you are talking "crazy talk"...........................keep it up and you may be the first person that I put on ignore.

 

Nesmith forever !

 

 

.

Posted

We are still on topic....................Since the Monkee-Mobile obviously contributed to Global Warming.................:rolleyes:

 

 

 

.

Posted
4 hours ago, Foxx said:

silly monkees... give them thumbs, they make a club, and beat their brother down.

 

give a monkey a typewriter and it can write a peer reviewed climate report accepted by the Consensus

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

Now you are talking "crazy talk"...........................keep it up and you may be the first person that I put on ignore.

 

Nesmith forever !

 

 

.

 

Tork had a Greenwich Village folk act going and was very capable on banjo and guitar and keyboards, a compatriot and friend of Stephen Stills at the time

 

just because Mike earnestly stared at all his chord changes during during the videos didn’t mean he was good

 

So you learned something there, twink.

 

you don’t have to thank me.....

 

Edited by row_33
Posted
2 hours ago, row_33 said:

 

Tork had a Greenwich Village folk act going and was very capable on banjo and guitar and keyboards, a compatriot and friend of Stephen Stills at the time

 

just because Mike earnestly stared at all his chord changes during during the videos didn’t mean he was good

 

So you learned something there, twink.

 

you don’t have to thank me.....

 

 

 

Man, when you step in it you don't %$#@ around.

 

The only established musician of the bunch when the "band" was formed was Nesmith. Tork could play, but the only music he actually played on was that which was written and produced by Nesmith.

 

I saw them live in 1968. Tork was no longer with the band. Nesmith was the only one of the remaining three that actually played his instrument.

 

He nailed "Pleasant Valley Sunday" front to back.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...