Gary M Posted August 31, 2017 Posted August 31, 2017 Hate to think what these hurricanes will look like in ten years after the Gulf is even warmer. Won't matter. No one will be able to live in Texas when the water rises. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Interior_Seaway
snafu Posted August 31, 2017 Posted August 31, 2017 Hate to think what these hurricanes will look like in ten years after the Gulf is even warmer. What's making the water warmer?
Nanker Posted August 31, 2017 Posted August 31, 2017 What's making the water warmer? People who smoke cigarettes.
boyst Posted August 31, 2017 Posted August 31, 2017 Cow farts If tiberius forever left this community I would change that to my screen name
row_33 Posted August 31, 2017 Posted August 31, 2017 Send the warmth to Toronto, the heat won't be turned on for another month or so.
B-Man Posted September 1, 2017 Posted September 1, 2017 (edited) DA TECH GUY: A Simple Proof of the Insanity of Global Warming Hysteria. When it comes to Hurricanes we have exact data that can be gleamed in real time of every aspect of a storm as it happens to add to the various computer models. Additionally we have live data dating back to the mid 19th century that has been studied by experts in the field for a century and a half to tell us how hurricanes have acted in the past including information made by first hand observation by the most advanced instruments available at the time. Furthermore the computers now being used are leaps and bounds over machines of just a decade or two ago and unlike the mid 19th century we many venues all over the world that are a source of training in this information and an even larger pool of potential meteorologists available to allow those tasked with making these predictions to choose the very best. Yet even with all of this, two weather services each with all the advantages listed, have 850 mile gap between where they think this storm will go over the next 72 hours. Now as a person familiar with both mathematics and computer science, this variation is not odd, in fact it’s completely understandable. After all a computer model is based on the best possible guesses from the available data and hurricanes are “complex natural phenomena that involve multiple interacting processes” so there is nothing at all odd about there being a 850 mile variation as to where it will hit. As we get closer to Sunday and we have true data to input the variation in the models will correspondingly decrease. Now apply this to climate change models telling us we face disaster in 100 years. Read the whole thing. A simpler explanation can be found in the old axiom: Hysteria is never whipped up for the benefit of the hysterical. . Edited September 1, 2017 by B-Man
Tiberius Posted September 1, 2017 Posted September 1, 2017 Send the warmth to Toronto, the heat won't be turned on for another month or so. What about the water? Looks like these once in hundreds of years events are coming again and again. Getting stronger, too! Our way of life is in danger from this
DC Tom Posted September 1, 2017 Posted September 1, 2017 DA TECH GUY: A Simple Proof of the Insanity of Global Warming Hysteria. When it comes to Hurricanes we have exact data that can be gleamed in real time of every aspect of a storm as it happens to add to the various computer models. Additionally we have live data dating back to the mid 19th century that has been studied by experts in the field for a century and a half to tell us how hurricanes have acted in the past including information made by first hand observation by the most advanced instruments available at the time. Furthermore the computers now being used are leaps and bounds over machines of just a decade or two ago and unlike the mid 19th century we many venues all over the world that are a source of training in this information and an even larger pool of potential meteorologists available to allow those tasked with making these predictions to choose the very best. Yet even with all of this, two weather services each with all the advantages listed, have 850 mile gap between where they think this storm will go over the next 72 hours. Now as a person familiar with both mathematics and computer science, this variation is not odd, in fact it’s completely understandable. After all a computer model is based on the best possible guesses from the available data and hurricanes are “complex natural phenomena that involve multiple interacting processes” so there is nothing at all odd about there being a 850 mile variation as to where it will hit. As we get closer to Sunday and we have true data to input the variation in the models will correspondingly decrease. Now apply this to climate change models telling us we face disaster in 100 years. Read the whole thing. A simpler explanation can be found in the old axiom: Hysteria is never whipped up for the benefit of the hysterical. . Weather. Is. Not. Climate.
B-Man Posted September 7, 2017 Posted September 7, 2017 Renowned climate scientist jailed for fraudby Thomas Lifson Original Article Well, it’s a start…. Lucy Smith reports for the Townsville (Queensland), Australia Bulletin: A RENOWNED climate scientist has been jailed for fraudulently claiming half a million dollars in reimbursements from his employer. Over seven years, Australian Institute of Marine Science senior researcher Daniel Michael Alongi lodged 129 claims for fictitious purchases totalling $553,420. (snip) Alongi is not some minor figure in the Warmist research establishment. Eric Worrall comments: “According to Research Gate, Alongi has helped author 140 publications, and has been cited 5,861 times. All in the last few months has been bad for the image of mainstream climate science. more at the link:
row_33 Posted September 7, 2017 Posted September 7, 2017 still freezing (seasonally) in Toronto with no heat turned on until October most women have brought in base heaters for their offices the last few weeks. global warming, yes please.....
Tiberius Posted September 7, 2017 Posted September 7, 2017 Renowned climate scientist jailed for fraud by Thomas Lifson Original Article Well, it’s a start…. Lucy Smith reports for the Townsville (Queensland), Australia Bulletin: A RENOWNED climate scientist has been jailed for fraudulently claiming half a million dollars in reimbursements from his employer. Over seven years, Australian Institute of Marine Science senior researcher Daniel Michael Alongi lodged 129 claims for fictitious purchases totalling $553,420. (snip) Alongi is not some minor figure in the Warmist research establishment. Eric Worrall comments: “According to Research Gate, Alongi has helped author 140 publications, and has been cited 5,861 times. All in the last few months has been bad for the image of mainstream climate science. more at the link: Oh, this proves a lot
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted September 7, 2017 Posted September 7, 2017 (edited) I know no one here listens to this jackalope Rush Limbaugh on Hurricane Irma: Powerful Storm or Liberal Conspiracy? On Monday, the right-wing radio personality delivered a customarily freewheeling monologue in which he seemed to suggest that hurricanes were a liberal conspiracy intended to convince the public that climate change is real "There is a desire to advance this climate change agenda, and hurricanes are one of the fastest and best ways to do it," Limbaugh said. "You can accomplish a lot just by creating fear and panic. You don't need a hurricane to hit anywhere. All you need is to create the fear and panic accompanied by talk that climate change is causing hurricanes to become more frequent and bigger and dangerous." Edited September 7, 2017 by ShadyBillsFan
DC Tom Posted September 7, 2017 Posted September 7, 2017 I know no one here listens to this jackalope Rush Limbaugh's Dismissal of Irma 'Panic' Riles Forecasters Calling this fake news by the liberal media. Rush Limbaugh has created a storm of his own by suggesting that the "panic" caused by Hurricane Irma benefits retailers, the media and politicians seeking action on climate change. "There is a desire to advance this climate change agenda, and hurricanes are one of the fastest and best ways to do it," Limbaugh said. "You can accomplish a lot just by creating fear and panic. You don't need a hurricane to hit anywhere. All you need is to create the fear and panic accompanied by talk that climate change is causing hurricanes to become more frequent and bigger and dangerous." He's not wrong.
B-Man Posted September 7, 2017 Posted September 7, 2017 He's not wrong. That is true. but it hasn't stopped the MSM from spinning what he said (no surprise there) NBC called him a "hurricane-denier" this AM............. It was obvious to anyone who reads his actual words that he is commenting on the media, not the storm. but, it will go down in libland as another established "hate fact"
grinreaper Posted September 7, 2017 Posted September 7, 2017 I know no one here listens to this jackalope Rush Limbaugh on Hurricane Irma: Powerful Storm or Liberal Conspiracy? On Monday, the right-wing radio personality delivered a customarily freewheeling monologue in which he seemed to suggest that hurricanes were a liberal conspiracy intended to convince the public that climate change is real "There is a desire to advance this climate change agenda, and hurricanes are one of the fastest and best ways to do it," Limbaugh said. "You can accomplish a lot just by creating fear and panic. You don't need a hurricane to hit anywhere. All you need is to create the fear and panic accompanied by talk that climate change is causing hurricanes to become more frequent and bigger and dangerous." Nice way to mischaracterize what he said.
Tiberius Posted September 8, 2017 Posted September 8, 2017 He's not wrong. That the media is hyping this monster storm?? Seriously?? **** On his daily syndicated radio show Tuesday, Limbaugh claimed that forecasters and the media alike were overhyping the hurricane in a bid to juice retail sales at stores in South Florida. “The reason that I am leery of forecasts this far out, folks,” Limbaugh said, “is because I see how the system works.” Limbaugh went on to explain that this is a “symbiotic relationship.” “The media benefits with the panic with increased eyeballs, and the retailers benefit from the panic with increased sales,” he said, “and the TV companies benefit because they’re getting advertising dollars from the businesses that are seeing all this attention from customers.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/09/07/the-hollowing-out-of-the-federal-workforce/?utm_term=.42ddd82bd868
Recommended Posts