B-Man Posted July 14, 2017 Posted July 14, 2017 ‘The Ugly Environmentalist’ by Jonah GoldbergRead more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/449477/climate-change-alarmists-environmentalists-hyberbolic-rhetoric-increasing
B-Man Posted July 14, 2017 Posted July 14, 2017 The Four Most Effective Things You Can Do About Climate Change, According To Science. Don’t bother clicking. The four things are what you’d expect from people happy to have everyone else reduced to a pre-modern existence: “Do Not Have That Child,” “Live Car-Free,” “Skip That Flight,” “Eat a Plant-Based Diet.”
DC Tom Posted July 17, 2017 Posted July 17, 2017 Like the old song says: There it is According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, No. No, no, no, no, no. No, it hasn't. And it's the same bull **** study you posted about at the top of this page.
Tiberius Posted July 25, 2017 Posted July 25, 2017 Blood sucking ticks are spreading like crazy in the northeast now because of shorter winters and longer falls. Never had them in my yard before and laid down to read and there were some on my leg. I looked up some web sites and sure enough they are at record numbers. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/28/tick-populations-booming-due-to-climate-change
Joe Miner Posted July 25, 2017 Posted July 25, 2017 Blood sucking ticks are spreading like crazy in the northeast now because of shorter winters and longer falls. Never had them in my yard before and laid down to read and there were some on my leg. I looked up some web sites and sure enough they are at record numbers. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/28/tick-populations-booming-due-to-climate-change
B-Man Posted July 25, 2017 Posted July 25, 2017 Usually blood-sucking ticks leave liberals alone.....................................................professional courtesy
row_33 Posted July 25, 2017 Posted July 25, 2017 Hurts like an SOB to have to get a tick pulled off yer naughty bits. One of Hall and Oates had been under the gun for Lyme disease for years, and when he went on Howard Stern (a great interview surprisingly) they brought out Richard to talk about tick removal from his body.
boyst Posted July 25, 2017 Posted July 25, 2017 Hurts like an SOB to have to get a tick pulled off yer naughty bits. One of Hall and Oates had been under the gun for Lyme disease for years, and when he went on Howard Stern (a great interview surprisingly) they brought out Richard to talk about tick removal from his body. hall hates deers because they spread ticks so much
row_33 Posted July 25, 2017 Posted July 25, 2017 hall hates deers because they spread ticks so much Mr. Hall it was then!!!
grinreaper Posted July 25, 2017 Posted July 25, 2017 High in the 60's in WNY today, July 25th. This proves without a shadow of doubt that we are entering a cooling off period.
row_33 Posted July 25, 2017 Posted July 25, 2017 High in the 60's in WNY today, July 25th. This proves without a shadow of doubt that we are entering a cooling off period. Every change in the temperature is due to global warning, it is the answer to the weather every single day.
Gary M Posted July 25, 2017 Posted July 25, 2017 Blood sucking ticks are spreading like crazy in the northeast now because of shorter winters and longer falls. Never had them in my yard before and laid down to read and there were some on my leg. I looked up some web sites and sure enough they are at record numbers. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/28/tick-populations-booming-due-to-climate-change Maybe it we give enough of our money to third world countries for windmills we can bring back some ice and not have to worry about ticks. http://www.newyorknature.net/IceAge.html
row_33 Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 is is okay to make icecubes in the freezer, more than i really need for the week, will the world melt? will someone please take on a self-appointed authority to rule on this?
B-Man Posted July 26, 2017 Posted July 26, 2017 TODAY IN THE ANNALS OF STUPID, CLIMATE EDITION A group of “children” (as activist lawyers call their clients) filed a federal lawsuit a while ago claiming that a right to a stable climate should be enforced by judicial decree as a postulate of the due process clause of the 14th Amendment, and the federal district court judge in Oregon (figures) denied a motion to dismiss. This lawsuit is so silly I didn’t bother to make note of it here. If the plaintiffs actually won this case, it would essentially mean the end of the Constitution. Are we really supposed to think that federal judges should supervise climate policy? It has worked so well in the case of public schools. More likely it is intended as a way of prying open the doors for trial lawyers to extract tobacco-settlement style exactions from the energy industry. Guess who else thinks it is silly? The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which yesterday issued a stay on further proceedings at the trial court level pending review by the appeals court. If even the famously flaky 9th Circuit thinks you’re going too far. . .
unbillievable Posted July 27, 2017 Posted July 27, 2017 Why are we still at the mercy of the weather? It's 2017... 2017!!
OCinBuffalo Posted July 27, 2017 Posted July 27, 2017 (edited) Can someone please school me real quick on a question. I'm not that concerned about ice melting or the ocean and air temps raising slightly. But what about the 40 billion tons of carbon dioxide that gets released into the atmosphere every year? Won't this have a cumulative effect over 50 or 100 years? Um...plants eat it. And, there is no shortage of plants. Ugh. Again? Well, there's always "the science", which has been totally corrupted beyond all recognition. In 2 sentences: our atmosphere's CO2 sensitivity has been wildly overestimated to suit a political agenda. You dial it down, and: presto, every failed model starts to make statistical sense. So, to answer your question directly? We literally have no idea what the difference between what 40 billion and 140 billion tons of CO2 will do. This planet has endure 4x the level of C02 we have today. What we do know is: the modeling that is "the science" so far has proven, beyond all doubt, that the climate is NOT as sensitive to CO2 as has been claimed. The empirical measurements prove it. The proper usage is Your a moran. No, it's you're a maroon. Finally, again, I ask: when are you all going to come to terms with the following 2 facts? 1. Global Warming is now the issue that Americans care least about 2. Now causatively based on #1, but also substantively: this is a dead political issue. Edited July 27, 2017 by OCinBuffalo
Gary M Posted July 27, 2017 Posted July 27, 2017 Finally, again, I ask: when are you all going to come to terms with the following 2 facts? 1. Global Warming is now the issue that Americans care least about 2. Now causatively based on #1, but also substantively: this is a dead political issue. I think Russia-Trump collusion might be number one.
Recommended Posts