TakeYouToTasker Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 Gonna Have to agree, that whatever his political slant is, the pic is grossly offensive. Can he not see this? He's a piece of **** who crawled up out of a stormfront gutter.
Nanker Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 JHFC I missed that till now. That's abhorrent, and thoroughly cravenly disgusting. He's abhorrent, and thoroughly cravenly disgusting. Mods need to delete that pic at the very least. IMHO. :angry:
IDBillzFan Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 (edited) Gonna Have to agree, that whatever his political slant is, the pic is grossly offensive. Can he not see this? See it? He regrets he wasn't there to wrap the rope around the neck. Edited December 29, 2016 by LABillzFan
meazza Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 There are like three hardcore supporters here. You're not really getting a rise out of anybody. Certainly not to this extent: !@#$ you
Nanker Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 How do you block posters? I've forgotten where to look for that setting.
DC Tom Posted December 29, 2016 Posted December 29, 2016 He's a piece of **** who crawled up out of a stormfront gutter. No, he's just a troll. I mean, yes, he's a piece of ****. But he's just trying to get a rise out of people. If he were a true neo-Nazi, he wouldn't be here alone.
GG Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 No, he's just a troll. I mean, yes, he's a piece of ****. But he's just trying to get a rise out of people. If he were a true neo-Nazi, he wouldn't be here alone. Why? They're too stupid to complete a sentence, so they need help?
DC Tom Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 Why? They're too stupid to complete a sentence, so they need help? No, they're not Democrats. Just cowards.
Tiberius Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 And another good fact about the death spiral of coal as an energy source! http://www.whio.com/news/national/another-safe-year-coal-mining-with-record-low-deaths/bQ961DKqviO0vkAxwX8CXP/
DC Tom Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 And another good fact about the death spiral of coal as an energy source! http://www.whio.com/news/national/another-safe-year-coal-mining-with-record-low-deaths/bQ961DKqviO0vkAxwX8CXP/ [This is an automated response.] You're an idiot. Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.3.
keepthefaith Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 And another good fact about the death spiral of coal as an energy source! http://www.whio.com/news/national/another-safe-year-coal-mining-with-record-low-deaths/bQ961DKqviO0vkAxwX8CXP/ Bat fatalities from wind turbines in the 10's of thousands per year. https://www.fort.usgs.gov/science-feature/96
B-Man Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 A BIG LOSS FOR GEORGIA TECH AS ONE OF ITS MOST FAMOUS FACULTY MEMBERS, JUDITH CURRY, DECIDES TO LEAVE. But the real downer is why: “The deeper reasons have to do with my growing disenchantment with universities, the academic field of climate science and scientists. . . . At this point, the private sector seems like a more ‘honest’ place for a scientist working in a politicized field than universities or government labs — at least when you are your own boss.”
Tiberius Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 A BIG LOSS FOR GEORGIA TECH AS ONE OF ITS MOST FAMOUS FACULTY MEMBERS, JUDITH CURRY, DECIDES TO LEAVE. But the real downer is why: “The deeper reasons have to do with my growing disenchantment with universities, the academic field of climate science and scientists. . . . At this point, the private sector seems like a more ‘honest’ place for a scientist working in a politicized field than universities or government labs — at least when you are your own boss.” In other words there is more money to be made being a hack for the polluters
OCinBuffalo Posted January 9, 2017 Posted January 9, 2017 (edited) Good...................let's see how Mr Mann likes it when his case gets to court............ Appeals Court Rules Climate Scientist Can Pursue Defamation Claims Against Critics Michael Mann, known for his work on the “hockey stick” analysis of global warming, can proceed with defamation claims against writers who called him the “the Jerry Sandusky of climate science” and characterized his work as fraudulent. https://www.buzzfeed.com/zoetillman/appeals-court-rules-climate-scientist-can-pursue-defamation?utm_term=.jl7qVWnpJ#.qe73LzJlG Check out the bizarre statement by the judge in this ruling..........................very illustrative Judge Vanessa Ruiz wrote for the three-judge appeals panel: “Tarnishing the personal integrity and reputation of a scientist important to one side may be a tactic to gain advantage in a no-holds-barred debate over global warming. That the challenged statements were made as part of such debate provides important context and requires careful parsing in light of constitutional standards. But if the statements assert or imply false facts that defame the individual, they do not find shelter under the First Amendment simply because they are embedded in a larger policy debate.” Did you read Steyn's blog in response to this decision? Very funny stuff. The worst part: even the global warming clowns now acknowledge that Mann's work is fraudulent, and that he fudged his data. But...IF you are Mark Steyn, you STILL aren't allowed to call Mann's work fraudulent(even though it's true), BECAUSE???? Mark Steyn doesn't have the requisite degrees and study in the field to be allowed to call out a fraud as a fraud. That's now the defense of Mann: only the experts can call a fraud a fraud. Right. As if any of them would have lifted a finger to prove Mann a fraud without Steyn's accusation. What's worse? Apparently the rest of the US citizenry aren't allowed to criticize fraudulent climate change "research", that directly effects us all, as it has been used to create US public policy. Oh no! The "fairness" of the global warming debate(read: you aren't allowed to call "obvious BS! "...without a climate science degree) supersedes our right to government by consent, and our right to free speech as well. Essentially, they can use junk science to create policy, but if we call it junk, that's "defamatory"? Yeah, watch this ruling get laughed out of the appeals court in about 3-6 months...that's if these 3 lady judges ever get off their asses and actually start the trial(It's been 3 years). Edited January 9, 2017 by OCinBuffalo
Tiberius Posted January 9, 2017 Posted January 9, 2017 Did you read Steyn's blog in response to this decision? Very funny stuff. The worst part: even the global warming clowns now acknowledge that Mann's work is fraudulent, and that he fudged his data. But...IF you are Mark Steyn, you STILL aren't allowed to call Mann's work fraudulent(even though it's true), BECAUSE???? Mark Steyn doesn't have the requisite degrees and study in the field to be allowed to call out a fraud as a fraud. That's now the defense of Mann: only the experts can call a fraud a fraud. Right. As if any of them would have lifted a finger to prove Mann a fraud without Steyn's accusation. What's worse? Apparently the rest of the US citizenry aren't allowed to criticize fraudulent climate change "research", that directly effects us all, as it has been used to create US public policy. Oh no! The "fairness" of the global warming debate(read: you aren't allowed to call "obvious BS! :wallbash:"...without a climate science degree) supersedes our right to government by consent, and our right to free speech as well. Essentially, they can use junk science to create policy, but if we call it junk, that's "defamatory"? Yeah, watch this ruling get laughed out of the appeals court in about 3-6 months...that's if these 3 lady judges ever get off their asses and actually start the trial(It's been 3 years). Well you must be happy that Trump is going to burn up the planet
Tiberius Posted January 9, 2017 Posted January 9, 2017 Environment police! http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2017/01/09/fbi-arrests-top-volkswagen-executive-emissions-scandal/96340582/
Nanker Posted January 9, 2017 Posted January 9, 2017 The EPA poisons our rivers and Obama did NOTHING about it.
Tiberius Posted January 9, 2017 Posted January 9, 2017 The EPA poisons our rivers and Obama did NOTHING about it. But he would have had to tax YOU to save someone's f'n river, so I guess he can't win
keepthefaith Posted January 9, 2017 Posted January 9, 2017 But he would have had to tax YOU to save someone's f'n river, so I guess he can't win What taxes would be required to hold the people responsible accountable? We the people would settle for having incompetent government officials fired once in a while.
DC Tom Posted January 9, 2017 Posted January 9, 2017 But he would have had to tax YOU to save someone's f'n river, so I guess he can't win [This is an automated response.] You're an idiot. Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.4.
Recommended Posts