boyst Posted November 29, 2016 Posted November 29, 2016 Maybe not happy, but there's plenty of company for them, that's for sure. you offerin' to keep my cows company too? I can tell ya all bout the Carolina hand warmer
Azalin Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 you offerin' to keep my cows company too? I can tell ya all bout the Carolina hand warmer Sadly, that might be the best offer I've had so far this week.
Greg F Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 Looks like the KOS kids are giving lessons on global warming climate change. If they waited a bit longer they could have had 3 penguins on that ice float. The poor penguins were not long for this life as a polar bear comes along and eats the penguins. I was just kidding ... the polar bear didn't eat the penguins since everybody knows there are no penguins at the North Pole. Well, everybody but the KOS kids.
Dante Posted December 1, 2016 Posted December 1, 2016 All a scam. Like Social Security, hell the income tax itself. All about control and how to separate us from even more of our money to give to the unproductive dbags. In government and otherwise. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/new-epa-rules-push-regulatory-costs-past-1-trillion-3080-per-person/article/2608593
/dev/null Posted December 4, 2016 Posted December 4, 2016 http://www.wsj.com/articles/my-unhappy-life-as-a-climate-heretic-1480723518 Heretic! Burn him!
Azalin Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 http://www.wsj.com/articles/my-unhappy-life-as-a-climate-heretic-1480723518 Heretic! Burn him! The problem is that little involving the popular notion of climate science actually involves real science. Despite what the Gators and Baskins of the world say, you can't make static declarations in a field of science that's as new and as fluid as climatology. The two leading governmental agencies involved in the studies - NASA and NOAA - are both younger than I am. To say that you can ascertain with any confidence what humanity's effect may or may not be, either short or long term, is not only arrogant in the extreme, it's really, really #@%&ing stupid. I'm willing to concede that our way of life may have an even greater effect on global climate change that what some adherents believe, but the truth is that we're too far away from truly understanding this particular field of science to make a determination either way. But there will always be people who are so easily duped that they'll defend anything.
DC Tom Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 The problem is that little involving the popular notion of climate science actually involves real science. Despite what the Gators and Baskins of the world say, you can't make static declarations in a field of science that's as new and as fluid as climatology. The two leading governmental agencies involved in the studies - NASA and NOAA - are both younger than I am. To say that you can ascertain with any confidence what humanity's effect may or may not be, either short or long term, is not only arrogant in the extreme, it's really, really #@%&ing stupid. I'm willing to concede that our way of life may have an even greater effect on global climate change that what some adherents believe, but the truth is that we're too far away from truly understanding this particular field of science to make a determination either way. But there will always be people who are so easily duped that they'll defend anything. Fluid? But there's consensus!
Azalin Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 Fluid? But there's consensus! As I know you understand completely, consensus is for people that don't know science from pig nipples. Simple minds - so easily played, so willingly duped.
DC Tom Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 As I know you understand completely, consensus is for people that don't know science from pig nipples. Simple minds - so easily played, so willingly duped. I'm pretty sure there's some science related to pig nipples. But the last thing I'm going to do is google "pig nipple science" to find out.
Azalin Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 I'm pretty sure there's some science related to pig nipples. But the last thing I'm going to do is google "pig nipple science" to find out. At least not on the work computer....
grinreaper Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 I'm pretty sure there's some science related to pig nipples. But the last thing I'm going to do is google "pig nipple science" to find out. Well, you could work around that by Googling Rosie O.
Azalin Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 Well, you could work around that by Googling Rosie O. I think I'd rather chance a pignipple search. It's probably the name of cheesy indie band.
Tiberius Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 Al Gore now. More Proof Trump knows his ignorant followers and will say anything to attract them. If MMGW is a hoax, why meet with Gore. No, I will not get dragged into an argument about meaning of word "ignorant."
Chef Jim Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 Al Gore now. More Proof Trump knows his ignorant followers and will say anything to attract them. If MMGW is a hoax, why meet with Gore. No, I will not get dragged into an argument about meaning of word "ignorant." We don't know why he'd meet with Gore. Why don't you tell us why he met with Gore. Sounds like you were there so you must know exactly what they talked about.
DC Tom Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 Al Gore now. More Proof Trump knows his ignorant followers and will say anything to attract them. If MMGW is a hoax, why meet with Gore. No, I will not get dragged into an argument about meaning of word "ignorant." The irony being that Gore is the epitome of climatological ignorance.
Deranged Rhino Posted December 10, 2016 Posted December 10, 2016 George makes some sense of all this One of his best performances in a career filled with brilliant performances. That whole show is worth revisiting as it's still amazingly relevant.
keepthefaith Posted December 10, 2016 Posted December 10, 2016 Al Gore now. More Proof Trump knows his ignorant followers and will say anything to attract them. If MMGW is a hoax, why meet with Gore. No, I will not get dragged into an argument about meaning of word "ignorant." The meeting had nothing to do with MMGW. Gore is unhappy that the Supreme Court stole the election from him and also about Russian hackers stealing the election from Hillary, hence the meeting. The reports that they met regarding the climate are fake news.
Nanker Posted December 11, 2016 Posted December 11, 2016 Nonsense. Al's been to several new masseuses since his divorce from Tipper and thinks he's finally been able to release his "second chakra." He was just checking in with the supreme Alpha Male to see if he was now actually doing it right. Al Gore. All you ever need to know about this slimeball AL G.
Recommended Posts