DC Tom Posted May 27, 2016 Posted May 27, 2016 An inconvenient 10 years: Al Gore gets more alarmist while the science doesn’t http://www.cfact.org/2016/05/26/an-inconvenient-10-years-al-gore-gets-more-alarmist-while-the-science-doesnt/ … “It means creating tens of millions of new jobs to retrofit buildings, to transform energy systems and install advanced batteries, to transform agriculture and forestry, and to make the solutions to the climate crisis the central organizing principle of our civilization,” Gore said. And what's the ecological footprint of that fundamental transformation, manufacturing, and job creation? Oh, that's right, you have no idea, you bloviating fool.
KD in CA Posted May 27, 2016 Posted May 27, 2016 An inconvenient 10 years: Al Gore gets more alarmist while the science doesn’t http://www.cfact.org/2016/05/26/an-inconvenient-10-years-al-gore-gets-more-alarmist-while-the-science-doesnt/ … I love statements like this: “The bottom line is that global surface temperature experienced a warming slowdown over the early-2000s, and this slowdown was at odds with our expectation from most climate model simulations,” wrote John Fyfe, a Canadian climate modeler and author of a recent commentary on the hiatus. Oh yes, your projections were "at odds with" reality. So you couldn't even predict what was going to happen a couple years ahead yet when you extrapolate the same flawed assumptions over decades or centuries, we should rely on those fantasies?? You really can fool some of the people all of the time.
B-Man Posted May 30, 2016 Posted May 30, 2016 (edited) Via The Daily Mail: As the summer beach season opens across the United States, experts are warning beach goers to take extra precautions as they predict a record number of shark attacks this year. George Burgess, director of the International Shark Attack File at the University of Florida, warned that the United States could expect more than 100 attacks this year – thanks, in part, to global warming. ‘We should have more bites this year than last,’ Burgess, said in an interviewshortly before the Memorial Day holiday weekend that signals the unofficial start of America’s summer vacation – and beach – season. In 2015, there were 98 shark attacks, including six fatalities, according to Burgess. But this year could surpass the number as shark populations recover from historiclows in the 1990s, while the world’s human population has grown and rising temperatures are leading more people to go swimming, Burgess said. Still, the university notes that fatal shark attacks, while undeniably graphic, are so infrequent that beachgoers face a higher risk of being killed by sand collapsing as the result of over achieving sand castle builders. Keep reading… .. Wait a minute......................increased shark attacks, increased Hurricanes and Tornadoes Damn it Climate Change ! this can only lead to............................. Edited May 30, 2016 by B-Man
/dev/null Posted May 30, 2016 Posted May 30, 2016 Via The Daily Mail: As the summer beach season opens across the United States, experts are warning beach goers to take extra precautions as they predict a record number of shark attacks this year. George Burgess, director of the International Shark Attack File at the University of Florida, warned that the United States could expect more than 100 attacks this year – thanks, in part, to global warming. ‘We should have more bites this year than last,’ Burgess, said in an interviewshortly before the Memorial Day holiday weekend that signals the unofficial start of America’s summer vacation – and beach – season. In 2015, there were 98 shark attacks, including six fatalities, according to Burgess. But this year could surpass the number as shark populations recover from historiclows in the 1990s, while the world’s human population has grown and rising temperatures are leading more people to go swimming, Burgess said. Still, the university notes that fatal shark attacks, while undeniably graphic, are so infrequent that beachgoers face a higher risk of being killed by sand collapsing as the result of over achieving sand castle builders. Keep reading… .. Wait a minute......................increased shark attacks, increased Hurricanes and Tornadoes Damn it Climate Change ! this can only lead to............................. Obama promised to slow the rise of the oceans and heal the planet, but under his Administration we have only see the rise in Sharknado's
/dev/null Posted June 5, 2016 Posted June 5, 2016 Heliocentric Heretics obfuscating with data: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/06/04/solar-cycle-update-spotless/
Nanker Posted June 7, 2016 Posted June 7, 2016 It was hot here yesterday, so I was beginning to believe in global warming. It's cooler here today, so I've stopped beginning to believe in global warming.
B-Man Posted June 9, 2016 Posted June 9, 2016 New Cloud Studies Are Another Blow to Climate Extremism
B-Man Posted June 14, 2016 Posted June 14, 2016 Democrat Congressmen: First Amendment Doesn’t Protect Global Warming Skeptics Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/13/dem-congressmen-first-amendment-doesnt-protect-global-warming-skeptics/#ixzz4BZomNvt5
DC Tom Posted June 14, 2016 Posted June 14, 2016 Democrat Congressmen: First Amendment Doesn’t Protect Global Warming Skeptics Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/13/dem-congressmen-first-amendment-doesnt-protect-global-warming-skeptics/#ixzz4BZomNvt5 freedom of speech “is not designed to protect fraud and deceit” of the likes being spread by oil company ExxonMobil about global warming. Great. Given that An Inconvenient Truth was full of alarmist fraud and deceit, can we prosecute Al Gore on the same principle, then?
Gary M Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 Great. Given that An Inconvenient Truth was full of alarmist fraud and deceit, can we prosecute Al Gore on the same principle, then? No because that deceit and fraud is settled.
Azalin Posted June 16, 2016 Posted June 16, 2016 No because that deceit and fraud is settled. One word: manbearpig.
B-Man Posted June 27, 2016 Posted June 27, 2016 Dem Party Platform Calls For Prosecuting Global Warming Skeptics Democratic operatives responsible for creating their party’s platform this year have unanimously adopted a provision calling for the Department of Justice to investigate companies who disagree with Democrats on global warming science. A panel of Democrats voted Friday to approve a final draft of the party’s platform to promote “Progressive Democratic Values,” which apparently includes investigating energy companies who “misled” shareholders about global warming. “Another joint proposal calling on the Department of Justice to investigate alleged corporate fraud on the part of fossil fuel companies who have reportedly misled shareholders and the public on the scientific reality of climate change was also adopted by unanimous consent,” according to the Democratic National Convention’s website. The drafting committee, led by DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings, has decided to back ongoing investigations by mostly Democratic state attorneys general into ExxonMobil’s stance on global warming.
Gary M Posted June 27, 2016 Posted June 27, 2016 Dem Party Platform Calls For Prosecuting Global Warming Skeptics Democratic operatives responsible for creating their party’s platform this year have unanimously adopted a provision calling for the Department of Justice to investigate companies who disagree with Democrats on global warming science. A panel of Democrats voted Friday to approve a final draft of the party’s platform to promote “Progressive Democratic Values,” which apparently includes investigating energy companies who “misled” shareholders about global warming. “Another joint proposal calling on the Department of Justice to investigate alleged corporate fraud on the part of fossil fuel companies who have reportedly misled shareholders and the public on the scientific reality of climate change was also adopted by unanimous consent,” according to the Democratic National Convention’s website. The drafting committee, led by DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings, has decided to back ongoing investigations by mostly Democratic state attorneys general into ExxonMobil’s stance on global warming. Won't they have to provide facts at a trial? this could really backfire on them.
Very wide right Posted June 29, 2016 Author Posted June 29, 2016 If they had any balls they would have married a real ocean like the Atlantic. As usual a cogent response.
Deranged Rhino Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 http://www.rawstory.com/2016/06/unprecedented-scientists-declare-global-climate-emergency-after-jet-stream-crosses-equator/comments/#disqus
KD in CA Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 Won't they have to provide facts at a trial? this could really backfire on them. No worries, they'll have appointed all the judges by then.
DC Tom Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 http://www.rawstory.com/2016/06/unprecedented-scientists-declare-global-climate-emergency-after-jet-stream-crosses-equator/comments/#disqus Literally, just one !@#$'s blog based on one half-assed piece of artwork masquerading as science. He's the perfect example of why the science ISN'T "settled."
B-Man Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 Literally, just one !@#$'s blog based on one half-assed piece of artwork masquerading as science. He's the perfect example of why the science ISN'T "settled."
Recommended Posts