DC Tom Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Global Warming Alarmist expect incidences of school bullying to steadily rise as children react violently to rising temperatures. As people's eyes dry out from the warmer temperatures, people will blink more frequently. So their eyes will be open less often. So they won't be able to read as much, as quickly. Global Warming will cause a decline in literacy rates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 (edited) Today I learned that Global Warming is basically Chuck Norris. Edited April 2, 2015 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 But does climate change cause transactional sex? Global Warming Alarmist expect incidences of school bullying to steadily rise as children react violently to rising temperatures. As people's eyes dry out from the warmer temperatures, people will blink more frequently. So their eyes will be open less often. So they won't be able to read as much, as quickly. Global Warming will cause a decline in literacy rates. Ahh the wonderous transitive property. Is there anything it can't do? Today I learned that Global Warmer is basically Chuck Norris. Well, apparently it is limited, but only by the ability of its user. Anyhow, anyone else see this little pissing contest spout up? Pissant 2's response to Pissant A&B And Pissant A&B's response back Further proof of the transitive property's user limitation. New Rule: apparently, you can get in trouble for agreeing, but not agreeing vehemently enough, with The Tech? (By the way, since Scientology and its tactics are the model by which the environmentalist cult is now 100% based upon: I will from here refer to AGW/"settled science"/Climate Change etc. as "The Tech". It is wholly appropriate, as Scientology's eternal excuse for their lack of reproducable experimental results is "They[we never find out who "they" are] Were Doing it Wrong"...which is oddly familiar to Communism's excuse. Therefore, the eternal rallying cry for Scientology, new and improved is: "The Tech is Standardized!".) You see, the nature of Scientology's failure is NEVER in its design. After all, it was designed by L. Ron Hubbard, and he's ridden trains on Venus, so... Rather, it's always a pesky quality control issue. Somebody is always doing Scientology wrong, so it's illogical for us to expect it to produce stable, repeatable outcomes. It's always a problem of execution/quality, and therefore, constant effort is required(which of course costs constant $), to refine and standardize it. Similarly with Global Warming, Pissant's A&B are "doing it wrong". The Tech is being standardized, and we don't need these guys coming along and talking about past temperature data in any other context than: it 100% proves AGW. And of course, since AGW is also being standardized, that requires constant effort, which also requires constant $. Thank God, or L. Ron, for these scientists. We're lucky to have them, should pay them like CEOs, and go after anyone who denies their vaunted place in society. If they continue, we're going to look into their backgrounds and find out what their crimes are, and what they are trying to hide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 SO PHYTOPLANKTON ARE ON DECLINE IN THE SOUTHERN OCEAN, and it’s “possibly because of climate change.” But the period in question, 1998 to 2014, is one in which there has been no global warming — it almost perfectly corresponds to the ever-lengthening “pause.” So how can “climate change” be producing short-term results when climate hasn’t been changing over that period? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 SO PHYTOPLANKTON ARE ON DECLINE IN THE SOUTHERN OCEAN, and it’s “possibly because of climate change.” But the period in question, 1998 to 2014, is one in which there has been no global warming — it almost perfectly corresponds to the ever-lengthening “pause.” So how can “climate change” be producing short-term results when climate hasn’t been changing over that period? Can God create a boulder so heavy that even He can't move it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 Can God create a boulder so heavy that even He can't move it? The lack of global warming the last 15 years is proof of global warming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/31/scientists-say-new-study-is-a-death-blow-to-global-warming-hysteria/ Wonder if Barry will pay attention to this when he does his executive action on climate change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/02/us/california-imposes-first-ever-water-restrictions-to-deal-with-drought.html?_r=0 Wow, California is hurting bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/02/us/california-imposes-first-ever-water-restrictions-to-deal-with-drought.html?_r=0 Wow, California is hurting bad What does this have to do with global warming....I mean climate change? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 What does this have to do with global warming....I mean climate change? This is what's suppose to happen with warming. Look at all the government controls required to deal with it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 This is what's suppose to happen with warming. Look at all the government controls required to deal with it You do realize that CA has gone through cycles of extended drought over the past 1000 years? Of course you don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 You do realize that CA has gone through cycles of extended drought over the past 1000 years? Of course you don't. It's almost as bad here in Austin. Of course, being a semi-arid climate with massive population growth has nothing to do with anything, so it must be climate change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 This is what's suppose to happen with warming. Look at all the government controls required to deal with it All the predictions I can find that predict the drought are dated after the start of the drought. Before the drought, all the predictions were for excessive rain and flooding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 This is what's suppose to happen with warming. Look at all the government controls required to deal with it A good deal of California is nothing but a desert/irrigated desert. Farmers used to get water that was diverted from rivers. That is not happening now. Read up on the Delta Smelt for more information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 You do realize that CA has gone through cycles of extended drought over the past 1000 years? Of course you don't. So what? That means this can't be global warming? It's almost as bad here in Austin. Of course, being a semi-arid climate with massive population growth has nothing to do with anything, so it must be climate c Austin is in Texas you moron, not California. All the predictions I can find that predict the drought are dated after the start of the drought. Before the drought, all the predictions were for excessive rain and flooding. Sure Tom. Maybe that's just the way YOU read it. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 Reading g'man's responses to the three quotes in his post above just hammers home the fact he is spending too much time napping in study hall. I hope Mrs. Perry catches up with you soon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg F Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 This is what's suppose to happen with warming. Look at all the government controls required to deal with it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 That doesn't prove this isn't global warming. It could be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 That doesn't prove this isn't global warming. It could be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg F Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 That doesn't prove this isn't global warming. It could be It could be unicorn farts too and you can't prove it can't be ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts