Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Bills have 34 sacks thru 9 games ... 3.8/game

 

84' bears have the record at 74 .... 4.6/game

 

For Bills to catch them they need to average 5.7 over the remaining 7 games

 

Last week they had 6

Posted

I doubt it but I wonder what the record is for a starting DL? They probably have a good shot at that. I don't think that it is crazy to think that group has 50 sacks. It could be something like 15 for Dareus, 13 for Hughes, 13 for Mario and 9 for Kyke. That would be insane.

Posted (edited)

I doubt it but I wonder what the record is for a starting DL? They probably have a good shot at that. I don't think that it is crazy to think that group has 50 sacks. It could be something like 15 for Dareus, 13 for Hughes, 13 for Mario and 9 for Kyke. That would be insane.

wow you're right, this team doesn't blitz much so most of their sacks come from the front 4. Id imagine buddy Ryan's bears defense blitzed a lot. NFL's Rosenthal called bills front 4 a "force of nature" lol

Edited by JTSP
Posted

No historical record is likely. I think it would help a lot if our offense scored more points to force more teams to have pass at the end of games. That's unlikely, BUT we could lead the league by years end and that would be pretty cool. Either way, what a waste to have such an exceptional D and still miss the playoffs. We have to turn this around. It is cruel to this group, and we probably won't have Hughes next year.

Posted

No historical record is likely. I think it would help a lot if our offense scored more points to force more teams to have pass at the end of games. That's unlikely, BUT we could lead the league by years end and that would be pretty cool. Either way, what a waste to have such an exceptional D and still miss the playoffs. We have to turn this around. It is cruel to this group, and we probably won't have Hughes next year.

Yeah, I was thinking same thing. Its a shame an impotent offense is making us not apprediate the special defense we have

Posted

I doubt it but I wonder what the record is for a starting DL? They probably have a good shot at that. I don't think that it is crazy to think that group has 50 sacks. It could be something like 15 for Dareus, 13 for Hughes, 13 for Mario and 9 for Kyke. That would be insane.

 

that would be crazy. i dont think kyle gets there but all 3 of the others could eclipse the numbers you listed. dareus is on pace for 18.

Posted (edited)

 

 

that would be crazy. i dont think kyle gets there but all 3 of the others could eclipse the numbers you listed. dareus is on pace for 18.

I tried to go a little conservative for everyone but Kyle. It's basically like a sack each per game for the rest of the year (or in that general vicinity). They are at 27 sacks through 9 games (3 a game). If that group is to get to 50 sacks they need to average 3.29 sacks per game over the last 7 games. That doesn't feel crazy to me. Edited by Kirby Jackson
Posted

I tried to go a little conservative for everyone but Kyle. It's basically like a sack each per game for the rest of the year (or in that general vicinity). They are at 27 sacks through 9 games (3 a game). If that group is to get to 50 sacks they need to average 3.29 sacks per game over the last 7 games. That doesn't feel crazy to me.

It's a reasonable projection but crazy accomplishment

Posted (edited)

well they got 5 tonight, only 0.7 off the pace they needed to maintain

 

Mario w/ 3.5 owns Tannehill.

 

need to average 5.83/game to tie bears. it's not out of the question

Edited by JTSP
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

With tonight's 7, that's 46 for the year.

 

Puts them 26 behind Bears record of 72.

 

With 5 games left they need to average 5.2/game to tie.

 

This is very much within their sites.

 

Why isn't the media picking up on this?

Posted

With tonight's 7, that's 46 for the year.

 

Puts them 26 behind Bears record of 72.

 

With 5 games left they need to average 5.2/game to tie.

 

This is very much within their sites.

 

Why isn't the media picking up on this?

shhhh ....we don't want them to

Posted

With tonight's 7, that's 46 for the year.

 

Puts them 26 behind Bears record of 72.

 

With 5 games left they need to average 5.2/game to tie.

 

This is very much within their sites.

 

Why isn't the media picking up on this?

 

Too busy talking about how soft Robert Woods is.

Posted (edited)

With tonight's 7, that's 46 for the year.

 

Puts them 26 behind Bears record of 72.

 

With 5 games left they need to average 5.2/game to tie.

 

This is very much within their sites.

 

Why isn't the media picking up on this?

Isn't that crazy? It's so realistic. They are so, so good on the DL. I thought that they would set a 3 person record before looking at what that Vilings team did. Edited by Kirby Jackson
Posted

well they got 5 tonight, only 0.7 off the pace they needed to maintain

 

Mario w/ 3.5 owns Tannehill.

 

need to average 5.83/game to tie bears. it's not out of the question

 

They ran Vick and Geno out of bounds twice behind the line of scrimmage. Those are counted as sacks.

Posted

If this defense doesn't make the playoffs, Schwartz should go Buddy Ryan on Hackett.

 

This is one of the best defenses in the NFL and team history. It'd be a shame to waste such a talented group.

Posted

I love that jerry hughes got that vulture sack on that meaningless final play!

 

I know, that was awesome!!

×
×
  • Create New...