dave mcbride Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 oh please.. STOP with the madness!!!! Bradford's got a cap hit of $16,580,000 .... insanity plus you could have discussed this here Bills are pursuing sam Bradford trade The Bills don't really have a cap issue, and it's easy to restructure (they're going to want him for more than one year anyway, and that would necessitate a new contract). Not sure what the issue is ...
YoloinOhio Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 @TheJoeMarino: Sam Bradford was on pace for an excellent season in '13 before getting hurt. After 7 games, was on pace for 3,856 yds, 32 TD, 9 INT. 90.9 PR
BuffaloHokie13 Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 This just makes too much sense. He is the right age to fit in with this group. The Bills need to get a little lucky to find their franchise guy. If he can stay healthy (that is an ENORMOUS if) he has a chance to give them a Flacco like level of play. On this team that middle of the road type of performance may very well be good enough to win a Super Bowl. I am much more confident that he can be a top 15ish type of QB than I am that he can stay healthy for the whole season. Sums up what I think about this quite well.
dave mcbride Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 This would worry me John. Pegula took over the Sabres and just spent money like crazy. They missed terribly on free agents and now have to tank to rebuild their teams. If a team thinks a guy can be a franchise QB, they aren't going to move him, no matter the price. If (and who knows with these reports) the Rams trade Bradford, they don't think he is good. That worries me. They benched him for 48 year old Shaun Hill. C. Biscuit, I wouldn't be opposed to this. It might not work, but sometimes you gotta roll the dice. The upside is high. He was playing well in 2013 before getting hurt.
NoSaint Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 (edited) Id assume the trade would be contingent on him passing a Bills physical AND also contingent on him restructuring his contract and signing an extension. Despite a few crazy arguments so far -- Id say that's about as safe as an assumption could be. I think the discussion is roughly: Physical, 2nd round pick this year and a 4 next that can escalate with conditions and say a 3 year 30 mil deal leaving him time to sign one last monster deal if he earns it? I think thats a rough jumping off Edited February 24, 2015 by NoSaint
YoloinOhio Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 @viccarucci: Hearing the #Bills are not pursuing #Rams QB Sam Bradford, as being reported, from a source in the know.
YoloinOhio Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 Rumor halted @viccarucci: Hearing the #Bills are not pursuing #Rams QB Sam Bradford, as being reported, from a source in the know.
Canadian Bills Fan Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 People know what I would post in a thread like this..... CBF
DukeyBomb Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 Vic Carucci just stated on twitter that we are NOT pursuing contrary to recent report.
YoloinOhio Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 Vic carruci....buzz kill!Womp womp Or maybe the bills called him and said you better tweet that we are NOT pursuing him because we are totally pursuing him
dave mcbride Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 Re Vic Carucci: https://twitter.com/viccarucci/status/550394529963343872
YoloinOhio Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 Or Bradford's agent is trying to create leverage with Rams
Kirby Jackson Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 (edited) Who knows what is true and what isn't. Does anyone care to give a hypothetical price on a Bradford trade? I am thinking a 2 this year and a conditional 2 or 3 next year that becomes a 2 or 1 based on certain benchmarks. It is a total guess but if the Browns are looking too you will have to put a better package together if you want him. Edited February 24, 2015 by Kirby Jackson
Buffalo_Stampede Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 Someone is leaking fake information in an attempt to get Bradford traded. My guess is his agent because Bradford doesn't want to take a pay cut. So could the Rams possibly release him?
Chuck Wagon Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 I think the Browns want Bradford BAD and we are doing the Rams a solid by presenting an alternative to help create a "bidding war". If the Rams want Mariotta, dealing Bradford to the Browns would take out a Mariotta bidder while giving the Rams more ammunition to move up, especially if they get the 19th pick from Cleveland.
YoloinOhio Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 @mikerodak: Rams tell me that there is no merit to report that Bills are pursuing trade with QB Sam Bradford.
Canadian Bills Fan Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 Well that was over in a hurry CBF
Chuck Wagon Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 @mikerodak: Rams tell me that there is no merit to report that Bills are pursuing trade with QB Sam Bradford. So the Bills are done with Rodak and he needs to get info from the other team?
Recommended Posts