ExiledInIllinois Posted October 15, 2014 Posted October 15, 2014 So should she be prevented from flying when not sick, or simply told sternly not to fly when not sick? What if she's sick and doesn't know it? Powering through before she or anybody realizes it? Being who she is and what she does for a living... Is it really bad to order her to stay isolated for 21-45 days? Any word on how the people in the deceased guy's apartment building are doing under those orders?
Acantha Posted October 17, 2014 Posted October 17, 2014 Because we don't restrict people's travel in this country because they might be sick. If you want to criticize anyone, criticize her for being irresponsible in choosing to fly. It was her decision, no one else's, and as a health care professional, she ought to have known better. Lot's of people have restrictions placed on them due to their jobs. As far as I know, right to travel by air (in a sealed compartment with re-circulated air) is not in the constitution. This isn't a concentration camp we're talking about here. Yes, she's certainly to blame, and I hope she's feeling the heat for her actions, but I don't see any problem at all with minor (yes, this is minor) and temporary restrictions placed on people who have direct contact with the bodily fluids of Ebola patients. If health professionals are not willing to deal with that, they can find jobs that don't require such "sacrafices."
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 17, 2014 Posted October 17, 2014 But for the fatal disease um HELL YES.
Gary M Posted October 28, 2014 Posted October 28, 2014 How about Ebola nurse part two? https://www.google.com/search?q=Kaci+Hickox&es_sm=93&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=mNlPVO6_EsrisATVzYCgDQ&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAg
bbb Posted October 28, 2014 Posted October 28, 2014 How about Ebola nurse part two? https://www.google.c...ved=0CAkQ_AUoAg Her twin brother would kick my ass
\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted March 1, 2015 Posted March 1, 2015 Update: http://res.dallasnews.com/interactives/nina-pham/
Recommended Posts