Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 Woods actually had a good game. He's a really good blocker and fights for every yard. Plus he's a fighter. The Bills using 5 WR are not going to put up great stats for the individuals (except perhaps Sammy because he's a stud). Goodwin is an extremely valuable player that stats do not show at all. I heard in the pregame show that last week, because he was out, the defenses played a completely different game against us because they always accounted for him and his speed when he was running decoy routes. Stats are really misleading. Woods is a solid and valuable player. He was great in the first win. You're wasting your breath. JTSP watches Woods and sees a player who's "not physical"... that's the headline here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebug Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 Get some glasses! or a clue..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted October 6, 2014 Author Share Posted October 6, 2014 have you seen that dude block? the guy is almost too physical. I saw him whiff badly on a block on a throw to the right in 3rd QTR to Chandler, that could have cost us an important 1st down. Anyway, shouldn't a 1st round WR justify his role other than just a blocker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 What a most perfect spot to make my inaugural post. Thread….please come with me….it's time to die. I cant wait to watch this account sky-rocket to 10,000 posts in record time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 No one who has ever started a comment with "I hate to say" or "I'm sorry to say" has ever meant it. Ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 I saw him whiff badly on a block on a throw to the right in 3rd QTR to Chandler, that could have cost us an important 1st down. Anyway, shouldn't a 1st round WR justify his role other than just a blocker? TROLL!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 You're wasting your breath. JTSP watches Woods and sees a player who's "not physical"... that's the headline here. Next thread title possibilities? "Goodwin runs slow," ""Watkins sucks at spectacular catches," or, my personal favorite, "Scott Chandler gets great YAC." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ko12010 Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 Is this a joke thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 ... is simply not that great of a WR. I'd call him average, and his stats support that: 2013 - 14 games, 587 yards (42 avg), 3 TDs 2014 - 5 games, 156 yards (31 avg), 0 TDs needs time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 I saw him whiff badly on a block on a throw to the right in 3rd QTR to Chandler, that could have cost us an important 1st down. Anyway, shouldn't a 1st round WR justify his role other than just a blocker? Such a troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 (edited) No one who has ever started a comment with "I hate to say" or "I'm sorry to say" has ever meant it. Ever. I love it actually. "Self-aware" hypocrites who actually aren't self-aware. "I'd love to be wrong, but I'm going to defend my position with venom to the death and never admit my negative take was wrong." Edited October 6, 2014 by FireChan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly the Dog Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 Such a troll. Seriously, why would someone start a thread like this after this win? How about starting it when his alleged poor play doesn't help the team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 Seriously, why would someone start a thread like this after this win? How about starting it when his alleged poor play doesn't help the team? Alcohol? That's about as much as I can figure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 I saw him whiff badly on a block on a throw to the right in 3rd QTR to Chandler, that could have cost us an important 1st down. Anyway, shouldn't a 1st round WR justify his role other than just a blocker? yes, he should but, ya wanna know something really super funny hilarious to prove you don't know what the hell you're talking about? he was drafted in the second round with Kiko. :wallbash: :wallbash: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted October 6, 2014 Author Share Posted October 6, 2014 yes, he should but, ya wanna know something really super funny hilarious to prove you don't know what the hell you're talking about? he was drafted in the second round with Kiko. :wallbash: :wallbash: correct on draft order, my bad. But doesn't change the conclusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seasons1992 Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 What a most perfect spot to make my inaugural post. Thread….please come with me….it's time to die. I really like you already.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 correct on draft order, my bad. But doesn't change the conclusion. No, your suspect eyes and possible inebriation do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSBill Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 You win for the worst thread of the day. Congrats on that, you should feel special. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maury Ballstein Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 This is good. Jordan Palmers footwork and Mario for Skelton/Osweiler now have some competition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justnzane Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 Eric Moulds year 1: 20 receptions 279 yards 2 touchdowns year 2: 29 receptions 294 yards 0 touchdowns year 3: 67 receptions 1368 yards 9 touchdowns I use this example as most receivers don't do a lot in their first two seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts