Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 On 10/6/2014 at 12:56 AM, Kelly the Dog said: Woods actually had a good game. He's a really good blocker and fights for every yard. Plus he's a fighter. The Bills using 5 WR are not going to put up great stats for the individuals (except perhaps Sammy because he's a stud). Goodwin is an extremely valuable player that stats do not show at all. I heard in the pregame show that last week, because he was out, the defenses played a completely different game against us because they always accounted for him and his speed when he was running decoy routes. Stats are really misleading. Woods is a solid and valuable player. He was great in the first win. You're wasting your breath. JTSP watches Woods and sees a player who's "not physical"... that's the headline here.
truth on hold Posted October 6, 2014 Author Posted October 6, 2014 On 10/6/2014 at 12:57 AM, jboyst62 said: have you seen that dude block? the guy is almost too physical. I saw him whiff badly on a block on a throw to the right in 3rd QTR to Chandler, that could have cost us an important 1st down. Anyway, shouldn't a 1st round WR justify his role other than just a blocker?
DrDawkinstein Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 On 10/6/2014 at 12:57 AM, Idiotic Thread Grim Reaper said: What a most perfect spot to make my inaugural post. Thread….please come with me….it's time to die. I cant wait to watch this account sky-rocket to 10,000 posts in record time.
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 No one who has ever started a comment with "I hate to say" or "I'm sorry to say" has ever meant it. Ever.
DrDawkinstein Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 On 10/6/2014 at 12:59 AM, Joe_the_6_pack said: I saw him whiff badly on a block on a throw to the right in 3rd QTR to Chandler, that could have cost us an important 1st down. Anyway, shouldn't a 1st round WR justify his role other than just a blocker? TROLL!!
FireChan Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 On 10/6/2014 at 12:57 AM, GreggyT said: You're wasting your breath. JTSP watches Woods and sees a player who's "not physical"... that's the headline here. Next thread title possibilities? "Goodwin runs slow," ""Watkins sucks at spectacular catches," or, my personal favorite, "Scott Chandler gets great YAC."
Buffalo Barbarian Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 On 10/6/2014 at 12:49 AM, Joe_the_6_pack said: ... is simply not that great of a WR. I'd call him average, and his stats support that: 2013 - 14 games, 587 yards (42 avg), 3 TDs 2014 - 5 games, 156 yards (31 avg), 0 TDs needs time
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 On 10/6/2014 at 12:59 AM, Joe_the_6_pack said: I saw him whiff badly on a block on a throw to the right in 3rd QTR to Chandler, that could have cost us an important 1st down. Anyway, shouldn't a 1st round WR justify his role other than just a blocker? Such a troll.
FireChan Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 (edited) On 10/6/2014 at 1:00 AM, RJ (not THAT RJ) said: No one who has ever started a comment with "I hate to say" or "I'm sorry to say" has ever meant it. Ever. I love it actually. "Self-aware" hypocrites who actually aren't self-aware. "I'd love to be wrong, but I'm going to defend my position with venom to the death and never admit my negative take was wrong." Edited October 6, 2014 by FireChan
Kelly the Dog Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 On 10/6/2014 at 1:01 AM, GreggyT said: Such a troll. Seriously, why would someone start a thread like this after this win? How about starting it when his alleged poor play doesn't help the team?
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 On 10/6/2014 at 1:04 AM, Kelly the Dog said: Seriously, why would someone start a thread like this after this win? How about starting it when his alleged poor play doesn't help the team? Alcohol? That's about as much as I can figure.
boyst Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 On 10/6/2014 at 12:59 AM, Joe_the_6_pack said: I saw him whiff badly on a block on a throw to the right in 3rd QTR to Chandler, that could have cost us an important 1st down. Anyway, shouldn't a 1st round WR justify his role other than just a blocker? yes, he should but, ya wanna know something really super funny hilarious to prove you don't know what the hell you're talking about? he was drafted in the second round with Kiko. :wallbash: :wallbash:
truth on hold Posted October 6, 2014 Author Posted October 6, 2014 On 10/6/2014 at 1:07 AM, jboyst62 said: yes, he should but, ya wanna know something really super funny hilarious to prove you don't know what the hell you're talking about? he was drafted in the second round with Kiko. :wallbash: :wallbash: correct on draft order, my bad. But doesn't change the conclusion.
Seasons1992 Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 On 10/6/2014 at 12:57 AM, Idiotic Thread Grim Reaper said: What a most perfect spot to make my inaugural post. Thread….please come with me….it's time to die. I really like you already....
Deranged Rhino Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 On 10/6/2014 at 1:09 AM, Joe_the_6_pack said: correct on draft order, my bad. But doesn't change the conclusion. No, your suspect eyes and possible inebriation do.
CSBill Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 On 10/6/2014 at 12:51 AM, GreggyT said: You win for the worst thread of the day. Congrats on that, you should feel special.
Maury Ballstein Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 This is good. Jordan Palmers footwork and Mario for Skelton/Osweiler now have some competition.
justnzane Posted October 6, 2014 Posted October 6, 2014 Eric Moulds year 1: 20 receptions 279 yards 2 touchdowns year 2: 29 receptions 294 yards 0 touchdowns year 3: 67 receptions 1368 yards 9 touchdowns I use this example as most receivers don't do a lot in their first two seasons.
Recommended Posts