mrags Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 I agree with mrags and others who think that watching CJ run up the middle for a short gain on 1st and 2nd down leaving us with 3rd and 6+ is frustrating…especially when we see Fred consistently get 4-5 yards in the same situation as CJ gets 2. I think CJ’s 4 ypc this season and 5 ypc career averages are kind of misleading for how effective he really is as a RB. If he had any vision at all, he’d average way more than that. Fred’s bobbin’ and weavin’ run through traffic last week (I think it was for like 14 yards) was a thing of beauty and is the perfect example of why I think he should start or at least get more carries. CJ would have gotten maybe 3 yards out of that play. well said. Very well said. It's not about his average per carry. It's about how misleading it is, especially in the game time situations. A 30 yard run when your either up by a few scores, or down by too many to mean anything as far as a comeback are useless. Too many times, that's when CJ gets his yards. Rarely does he break one off when the game is in the line. It's always when the defense is expecting a pass and are in prevent. Or when they have already given up because they are down by so much. Comparing to Fred is bad use of a comparison IMO. But Fred (along with many other RBs in this league, not just the top 10) find ways to get those tough yards no matter what situation. They always find ways to fall forward. You think Darren McFadden isnt the only weapon on Oakland worth game planning and defending against? How bout MJD when he was on the Jags? How about either RB from the Panthers when they led the league in rushing before they even had Cam Newton? There literally dozens of examples I could find if I thought for 5 minutes but the fact is I'm pulling these off the top of my head. Good RBs are just good no matter what. They don't need those 15-30 yard runs a few times a game to bring their average up. They are grinders. I'm not saying there's no use for someone like Spiller. But nobody thinks Reggie Bush is a good RB. At least not for years while he was in NO. He was considered a bust. CJ is about the same. He gives you that factor. But doesn't do it enough to make a difference in the win column.
rfk Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 Wh dont they use him like Sproles...o thats right those teams have a QB
mrags Posted October 1, 2014 Posted October 1, 2014 Wh dont they use him like Sproles...o thats right those teams have a QB Sproles is the exact argument that I've been saying. He's really not that good. Has only had 1 single season with over 1,000 total yards from scrimmage. He's never lit up the end zone either. I don't get where people arguing that we should use him like Sproles. Why do you say that? Because he's got 2-3 years with over 500 receiving yards? If that's the case, just pay some nobody who's fast about 2 million a year to do that. Sounds like Goodwin to me. Sproles sucks at running the football. His stats prove that. Anyone to suggest otherwise are probably the same ones that think CJ is good too. Oh well, not everybody knows football that well. http://www.nfl.com/player/darrensproles/2506467/careerstats
Don Beebe Posted October 2, 2014 Posted October 2, 2014 post of the month right here-----^ Well done Why thank you!
zazie Posted October 2, 2014 Posted October 2, 2014 well said. Very well said. It's not about his average per carry. It's about how misleading it is, especially in the game time situations. A 30 yard run when your either up by a few scores, or down by too many to mean anything as far as a comeback are useless. Too many times, that's when CJ gets his yards. Rarely does he break one off when the game is in the line. It's always when the defense is expecting a pass and are in prevent. Or when they have already given up because they are down by so much. Comparing to Fred is bad use of a comparison IMO. But Fred (along with many other RBs in this league, not just the top 10) find ways to get those tough yards no matter what situation. They always find ways to fall forward. You think Darren McFadden isnt the only weapon on Oakland worth game planning and defending against? How bout MJD when he was on the Jags? How about either RB from the Panthers when they led the league in rushing before they even had Cam Newton? There literally dozens of examples I could find if I thought for 5 minutes but the fact is I'm pulling these off the top of my head. Good RBs are just good no matter what. They don't need those 15-30 yard runs a few times a game to bring their average up. They are grinders. I'm not saying there's no use for someone like Spiller. But nobody thinks Reggie Bush is a good RB. At least not for years while he was in NO. He was considered a bust. CJ is about the same. He gives you that factor. But doesn't do it enough to make a difference in the win column. Reggie Bush certainly has pretty good career numbers. Combined all purpose yards RB has had an excellent career, and he is still playing after forever.
NDBUFFCUSEFAN Posted October 2, 2014 Posted October 2, 2014 well said. Very well said. It's not about his average per carry. It's about how misleading it is, especially in the game time situations. A 30 yard run when your either up by a few scores, or down by too many to mean anything as far as a comeback are useless. Too many times, that's when CJ gets his yards. Rarely does he break one off when the game is in the line. It's always when the defense is expecting a pass and are in prevent. Or when they have already given up because they are down by so much. Comparing to Fred is bad use of a comparison IMO. But Fred (along with many other RBs in this league, not just the top 10) find ways to get those tough yards no matter what situation. They always find ways to fall forward. You think Darren McFadden isnt the only weapon on Oakland worth game planning and defending against? How bout MJD when he was on the Jags? How about either RB from the Panthers when they led the league in rushing before they even had Cam Newton? There literally dozens of examples I could find if I thought for 5 minutes but the fact is I'm pulling these off the top of my head. Good RBs are just good no matter what. They don't need those 15-30 yard runs a few times a game to bring their average up. They are grinders. I'm not saying there's no use for someone like Spiller. But nobody thinks Reggie Bush is a good RB. At least not for years while he was in NO. He was considered a bust. CJ is about the same. He gives you that factor. But doesn't do it enough to make a difference in the win column. You're a terrible poster with awful opinions. I'm just glad you can't make the team any worse by telepathy.
BringBackFergy Posted October 2, 2014 Author Posted October 2, 2014 You're a terrible poster with awful opinions. I'm just glad you can't make the team any worse by telepathy. Why sugar coat it?? Tell him how you really feel.
bowery4 Posted October 2, 2014 Posted October 2, 2014 with multiple SHITe coaches , multiple SHITe coordinators in the NFL he hasn't been. Okay okay, I vote you off the island, where is that damn thread now, I need to change my vote.BTW fixed that for you. First time in this thread. Haven't read it all,but has anyone done the math in the OP? 30 yarder plus 9 two yarders is 48 yards over 10 carries. 4.8 yards per carry. That's stellar. Add in the Freddy/Dixon ground 'n' pound and we have the making of an excellent backfield. Brown replaces Freddy eventually. This makes perfect sense. Shhh we're in the middle of a crusade, don't use logic Reggie Bush certainly has pretty good career numbers. Combined all purpose yards RB has had an excellent career, and he is still playing after forever. After NO, he also showed he is pretty all purpose, "when used correctly". I can just hear that noise when we don't get him back and he goes on to do better than Bush. The season under Chan wasn't a fluke, I don't understand why mRagsonspiller thinks it was. Get Him In Space And Everytime He Touches The Ball He Is A Threat = a Playmaker. What this team has said it wanted more of, for quite a few years. He is misused isn't an excuse, it has been proven by his "good year". It can and should be replicated. The 4 wide looks last week (although totally against the wrong team) were the right idea. I hope we see more of FJ and CJ on the field too.
mrags Posted October 2, 2014 Posted October 2, 2014 You're a terrible poster with awful opinions. I'm just glad you can't make the team any worse by telepathy. who are you? Okay okay, I vote you off the island, where is that damn thread now, I need to change my vote.BTW fixed that for you. Shhh we're in the middle of a crusade, don't use logic After NO, he also showed he is pretty all purpose, "when used correctly". I can just hear that noise when we don't get him back and he goes on to do better than Bush. The season under Chan wasn't a fluke, I don't understand why mRagsonspiller thinks it was. Get Him In Space And Everytime He Touches The Ball He Is A Threat = a Playmaker. What this team has said it wanted more of, for quite a few years. He is misused isn't an excuse, it has been proven by his "good year". It can and should be replicated. The 4 wide looks last week (although totally against the wrong team) were the right idea. I hope we see more of FJ and CJ on the field too. so let's get this straight. If CJ and the Bills first 3 drives were run for 2 yards, Run for 0, pass for 6 yards (because EJ can't get it done either), then punt. Then the opponent scores on each of their first 3 drives. Were down 21-0. Then CJ in his 4th drive rips off a 35 yarder and his average is 5 yards a carry... That's supposed to be good for the team? Good for the offense? Because that's pretty much what happens. Maybe we aren't down 21-0. But the fact is, he hurts many drives because of his inconsistency. Fwiw, multiple players have 1 good year and are then crap for the rest of their careers. Peyton Hillos comes to mind. Derick Anderson. There's plenty of them. Just because CJ had a fluke year doesn't mean it's ever going to happen again. And I'll continue to say that while his "good" year he produced quite a few yards he still had under 10 TDs together it takes his "good" year down just a little bit.
BringBackFergy Posted October 2, 2014 Author Posted October 2, 2014 who are you? so let's get this straight. If CJ and the Bills first 3 drives were run for 2 yards, Run for 0, pass for 6 yards (because EJ can't get it done either), then punt. Then the opponent scores on each of their first 3 drives. Were down 21-0. Then CJ in his 4th drive rips off a 35 yarder and his average is 5 yards a carry... That's supposed to be good for the team? Good for the offense? Because that's pretty much what happens. Maybe we aren't down 21-0. But the fact is, he hurts many drives because of his inconsistency. Fwiw, multiple players have 1 good year and are then crap for the rest of their careers. Peyton Hillos comes to mind. Derick Anderson. There's plenty of them. Just because CJ had a fluke year doesn't mean it's ever going to happen again. And I'll continue to say that while his "good" year he produced quite a few yards he still had under 10 TDs together it takes his "good" year down just a little bit. As Bowery said, stop bringing logic into this.
mikef272002 Posted October 2, 2014 Posted October 2, 2014 This is the problem with Buffalo, and the reason you/we will sit here and spin our wheels year after year letting our guys walk, moan and complain about weather the 11th pick was too high for a guy and he's playing like a 20th pick so we should get rid of him and so on, and now this.. Keep spinning your wheels Buffalo, but me personally I hope they re sign the most dynamic player in the NFL at RB and higher a new OC that can utilize it, rather than bank on letting him walk and Brown being the next McCoy..
dave mcbride Posted October 2, 2014 Posted October 2, 2014 (edited) Sproles is the exact argument that I've been saying. He's really not that good. Has only had 1 single season with over 1,000 total yards from scrimmage. He's never lit up the end zone either. I don't get where people arguing that we should use him like Sproles. Why do you say that? Because he's got 2-3 years with over 500 receiving yards? If that's the case, just pay some nobody who's fast about 2 million a year to do that. Sounds like Goodwin to me. Sproles sucks at running the football. His stats prove that. Anyone to suggest otherwise are probably the same ones that think CJ is good too. Oh well, not everybody knows football that well. http://www.nfl.com/player/darrensproles/2506467/careerstats I strongly, strongly disagree with your assessment of Sproles. He's on his way to his 6th straight season with 800+ yards from scrimmage, and he's doing it as a true part time player. His career yards per catch is 9.1 (extremely high for a rb) and his career yards per carry is 5.1 (also extremely high). How does that "suck"? Plus he scores around 7 TDs on average per year (factoring in ST). Find me a third down back with that sort of consistency. And you can't leave out why he's a part time player - he's been one of the best returners of the last decade, and he returns the ball a LOT. http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/S/SproDa00.htm Edited October 2, 2014 by dave mcbride
BringBackFergy Posted October 2, 2014 Author Posted October 2, 2014 I strongly, strongly disagree with your assessment of Sproles. He's on his way to his 6th straight season with 800+ yards from scrimmage, and he's doing it as a true part time player. His career yards per catch is 9.1 (extremely high for a rb) and his career yards per carry is 5.1 (also extremely high). How does that "suck"? Plus he scores around 7 TDs on average per year (factoring in ST). Find me a third down back with that sort of consistency. And you can't leave out why he's a part time player - he's been one of the best returners of the last decade, and he returns the ball a LOT. http://www.pro-footb.../S/SproDa00.htm So you're saying CJ could be a very good part time player when Fred and Bryce Brown need a breather?
freeagentqb Posted October 2, 2014 Posted October 2, 2014 Spiller is Roscoe Parrish playing running back........
Turbosrrgood Posted October 2, 2014 Posted October 2, 2014 Bryce is being redshirted this year. CJ won't be resigned this year and next year Brown will be our starting RB. I think this is probably true.
dave mcbride Posted October 2, 2014 Posted October 2, 2014 So you're saying CJ could be a very good part time player when Fred and Bryce Brown need a breather? No.
Maury Ballstein Posted October 2, 2014 Posted October 2, 2014 What other inactive players do tbd'ers dream about ? Hear the lions have some guys we should move on.
mrags Posted October 2, 2014 Posted October 2, 2014 No. ya. I'm pretty sure that's what you just said. As Bowery said, stop bringing logic into this. i know. Crazy logic. Let's keep a guy that helps us create 3 and outs all game long except for 1 drive every other game. This is the problem with Buffalo, and the reason you/we will sit here and spin our wheels year after year letting our guys walk, moan and complain about weather the 11th pick was too high for a guy and he's playing like a 20th pick so we should get rid of him and so on, and now this.. Keep spinning your wheels Buffalo, but me personally I hope they re sign the most dynamic player in the NFL at RB and higher a new OC that can utilize it, rather than bank on letting him walk and Brown being the next McCoy.. tgis makes me laugh. When we actually have good players I'll support that.
C.Biscuit97 Posted October 2, 2014 Posted October 2, 2014 What other inactive players do tbd'ers dream about ? Hear the lions have some guys we should move on. Silly right? The myth of Bryce Brown is greater than the myth of Kirk Cousins.
FireChan Posted October 2, 2014 Posted October 2, 2014 We really need an earth, wind, fire and water rotation. Freddy is fire cause he's passionate. Dixon is earth because he's tough. CJ is wind because he gets knocked backwards by a stiff breeze at the LOS. And Brown is water because he gets the Gatorade on the sidelines.
Recommended Posts