rcatty Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 Where is Chan when we could use him. Our offense percolated when he ran it!
rfk Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 Yeah it boiled over and turned into hot gas..Bring back Marv for those Marvelous draft choices too...Bring back Weinstadt ..oh wait we have..How bout Gregg Williams...I would bring back perry Fewell and Petinne..Mularkey was smart to catch a bus out of town.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 **sigh** one loss to a team that beat Seattle. RELAX!
BringBackFergy Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 **sigh** one loss to a team that beat Seattle. RELAX! but we need to talk about something until Sunday.
Saint Doug Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 I would love Chan as OC. Now that was an exciting offense, plus he is fairly good at guiding QB's to success.
filthymcnasty08 Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 I would love Chan as OC. Now that was an exciting offense, plus he is fairly good at guiding QB's to success. Just to clarify: Are we talking about Fitz?
ALF Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 (edited) Chan could be a fine mentor to Hackett While we are shopping, we could use a QB and OL whisperers Edited September 23, 2014 by ALF
BringBackFergy Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 Chan could be a fine mentor to Hackett While we are shopping, we could use a QB and OL whisperers Doug Marrone played OLine...I even saw him crouch down and snap the ball at mini camp...he has to be good.
bigK14094 Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 Bringing back Chan as OC is not the worst idea I have heard on this board by a long shot.
KollegeStudnet Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 Chan was an offensive genius?! I didn't get the memo
The Underdog Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 I'm a huge fan of Chan Gailey... He moved the ball on offense by design and scheme even if he didn't always have the talent.
Maddog69 Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 Call me crazy but I also felt like if we kept Dick Jauron as HC and hired Gailey as OC, the results would have been tremendous.
mrags Posted September 24, 2014 Posted September 24, 2014 Call me crazy but I also felt like if we kept Dick Jauron as HC and hired Gailey as OC, the results would have been tremendous. jurons desire to be the most conservative coach of all time wouldn't mix in with Chans stupidity.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted September 24, 2014 Posted September 24, 2014 but we need to talk about something until Sunday. Good point. If they give chan a call though, they can only use his help against d coordinators who don't have Rex Ryan's phone number.
Mr. WEO Posted September 24, 2014 Posted September 24, 2014 I'm a huge fan of Chan Gailey... He moved the ball on offense by design and scheme even if he didn't always have the talent. No he didn't. Look it up.
26CornerBlitz Posted September 24, 2014 Posted September 24, 2014 Where is Chan when we could use him. Our offense percolated when he ran it! I actually think it's a good idea, but there's no way Marrone and Hackett would be in favor of doing it.
TheFunPolice Posted September 24, 2014 Posted September 24, 2014 (edited) Chan Gailey is the most overrated coach (by some fans) in Buffalo Bills history. The BIGGEST myth is that his offense "moved the ball" and "scored points" more than Hackett's. In truth, the numbers are almost identical. Even worse for the legend of Chan Gailey is that he had "his guy." He had his "franchise QB", while Hackett had to cobble together a QB group of Manuel, who got hurt 3 times, Tuel, who was a UDFA rookie, and Thad Lewis. 2012 (Gailey with his "franchise QB") 5,486 yards 344 total points (21.5 PPG) offense ranked 21/32 in PPG 3,269 pass yards 2,217 rush yards 34 turnovers 2013 (Hackett with a constantly changing QB lineup featuring 2 rookies and Thad Lewis) 5,410 yards 339 points scored (21.2 PPG) offense ranked 22/32 in PPG 3,103 pass yards 2,307 rush yards 27 turnovers *************************************************************** Let's end this "legend of Chan" crap. His offense did not do anything special, as evidenced by the fact that it was no better than Hackett did with a constantly changing group of QBs. "But fun! but fun! Gailey and Fitzy were SO EXCITING to watch! The offense was GREAT!" Nope. Sorry, you just remember the off game or two when they did well. The bulk of Chan's games here were bottom 1/3 type offensive performances. And that was with the guy HE WANTED and did everything in his power to protect from any competition. Teams beat New England*. Miami just did it two weeks ago, and it wasn't by 3 points on a day where Brady threw 4 picks and the refs forgot who to favor. Edited September 24, 2014 by TheFunPolice
CountryCletus Posted September 24, 2014 Posted September 24, 2014 jurons desire to be the most conservative coach of all time wouldn't mix in with Chans stupidity. Can you imagine the flea flicker, fake pass, rush up the middle??? Lol
Dorkington Posted September 25, 2014 Posted September 25, 2014 (edited) Chan was better at one thing, and that's utilizing CJ, that's about it. If he could come in as a "screen designer" or "guy who tells Hackett to not power run CJ up the gut" guy, I'd support it. The rest is different scheming, but as above shows, mostly the same. Edited September 25, 2014 by Dorkington
Stussy109 Posted September 25, 2014 Posted September 25, 2014 I would love Chan as OC. Now that was an exciting offense, plus he is fairly good at guiding QB's to success. Chan had a way of turning NOBODY's into SOMEBODY's. Fitz, Stevie, Freddie, Donald Jones, David Nelson, Scott Chandler etc...
Recommended Posts