bananathumb Posted September 22, 2014 Posted September 22, 2014 You will never win with Marrone, Hackett and Schwartz. Hackett especially. Just one example - but one of many. Half-yard to go and you punt to give the ball back to the gd Chargers and Rivers at the 11, when you MIGHT have made it at the 42. That's all that needs to be said, other than S's defence was horrible too. SD was short a number of guys on the O-line, yet handled Blo's front four like they were backups.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted September 22, 2014 Posted September 22, 2014 They handled Seattles front four too. I guess Pete Carroll is going to hit the market soon.
johnwalter Posted September 22, 2014 Posted September 22, 2014 i agree with the premise of your thread title, but not the premise of your post itself.
Gugny Posted September 22, 2014 Posted September 22, 2014 How are we (2-1) and how did we beat Miami and Chicago? We lost to the Chargers ... not Jacksonville.
PearlHowardman Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 And the Buffalo Bills is stuck with these coaches, its ineffective second year QB, and a lousy draft position for next year. New ownership won't be able to change anything for at least the next two seasons. Mostly because of the Bills draft position next year. What coach/es would want to come to Buffalo if Marrone or any other coach is fired? Answer: none.
26CornerBlitz Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 You mean the Bills aren't gonna be 19-0?
stuvian Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 way to stay strong after losing to a playoff team
K-9 Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 Disagree. Coaching is certainly important but this is a player's league and always has been. GO BILLS!!!
Augie Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 What coach/es would want to come to Buffalo if Marrone or any other coach is fired? Answer: none. I have to disagree. We have a very talented D with Kiko coming back (think of him as our #1 pick) and great skill players on offense with some promising OL players. A guard or two, maybe a TE and fix the QB situation and we are a serious contender who makes a coach look like a genius. Yep, the QB part is tricky, but the rest seems pretty obvious. We may have the QB and we may not. Good coaches take jobs without having a HOF QB on board already. Great coaches find or make HOF QB's. I've been wrong before (ask my wife), but it's a mistake to over react after one loss to a good team. We are headed in the right direction.
NoSaint Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 Disagree. Coaching is certainly important but this is a player's league and always has been. GO BILLS!!! To some degree there are two tiers- have a qb and don't, but within those two tiers I think coaching can go a long way separating closely matched teams
K-9 Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 To some degree there are two tiers- have a qb and don't, but within those two tiers I think coaching can go a long way separating closely matched teams Like I said, coaching is certainly important. And all other things being equal, yeah, a better coach would have an advantage certainly. But even you qualified your statement by alluding to the critical importance of having that certain player at that certain position. How about this: good players will get you through times of poor coaching more than poor players will get you through times of good coaching? GO BILLS!!!
Fan in San Diego Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 My biggest gripe about the San Diego game was Hackett's conservative play calling in the 1st qtr/half. How many times do you have to run up the middle for no gain to start thinking about trying something else. We needed to play trying to get a big lead in the first half, not playing timidly to not lose. which will get you a loss.
Webster Guy Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 Top 10 playoff teams last year had the following qb's: P. Manning Brady Kapernick Wilson Brees Rodgers Luck Foles (119 passer rating last year) Cam Rivers So the league is all about coaching? I'll bet you my Barry Switzer Superbowl Ring Replica that it has WAY more to do with the QB than coaching.
ExiledInIllinois Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 Top 10 playoff teams last year had the following qb's: P. Manning Brady Kapernick Wilson Brees Rodgers Luck Foles (119 passer rating last year) Cam Rivers So the league is all about coaching? I'll bet you my Barry Switzer Superbowl Ring Replica that it has WAY more to do with the QB than coaching. Do all those QBs have "green dots" on the backs of their helmets? Outside of P.Manning, it is about coaching. Just imagine if Ditka had a "green dot" pipeline into McMahon's headset... Boy would I like to be a fly on his helmet.
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 NFL is about Practice NFL is about Execution
NoSaint Posted September 23, 2014 Posted September 23, 2014 (edited) Like I said, coaching is certainly important. And all other things being equal, yeah, a better coach would have an advantage certainly. But even you qualified your statement by alluding to the critical importance of having that certain player at that certain position. How about this: good players will get you through times of poor coaching more than poor players will get you through times of good coaching? GO BILLS!!! which is fair enough. i guess what i was getting at is that for the most part (barring a string of injuries, or a locker room meltdown that could probably be blamed on the coach)that the gap in talent on most rosters -- with the qb disclaimer -- doesnt typically run very wide. So a coach can make a pretty good difference if you think most teams are similar quality (again, qb disclaimer). rarely do we get to see guys flip their philosophies upside down, but "riverboat ron" last year might be a good example of what im talking about with how big a difference making calls that truly fit your team can make. Edited September 23, 2014 by NoSaint
Recommended Posts