T master Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 I was listening to "The John Murphy Show" tonight and one caller said we have been winning since E.J. is being utilized as a game manager. Murph disagreed pretty strongly and said he is too talented for that role. I think, as of right now, game manager is all I want him to be. It ain't broken, so no need to fix it. Murph needs to look at the red zone percentage I think i read where the Bills are 28th in the league in red zone percentage or was that 3rd downs can't remember exactly but either one is not good so he is managing the game & is not a elite QB talent . Wake up Murph ….
Stads Posted September 17, 2014 Author Posted September 17, 2014 How long does everyone think the "don't let E.J. do too much" game plan can be effective?
26CornerBlitz Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 How long does everyone think the "don't let E.J. do too much" game plan can be effective? Works pretty well for the Seahawks and 49ers.
Webster Guy Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 Game manager, to me is like that stupid phrase #1 receiver. Ambiguous and dependent upon a million different variables that change with circumstances, game situations, coverages, what the defense is giving you, etc. If you have a young qb who is average and learning the ropes, you give him a thinner playbook so he can focus on fundamental plays. If that makes him a game manager then that's what he is. I see it as a meaningless term.
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 Funny how "game manager" has become a euphemism for any starting quarterback that isn't a household name. Kind of like "character actors". To me, it's a specific term for a QB whose savvy and risk-averse nature overcomes an inability to hit intermediate and deep routes. Think Chad Pennington or Matt Cassel. The Bills run a ton of plays on the ground because that's where their strengths lie, but when EJ is asked to throw he has the full gamut of routes at his disposal. In my opinion, he is NOT a game manager. On the same token, Fitz (a below average starter overall) isn't a game manager. He's a misbegotten gunslinger.
White Linen Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 Teams, like NE, are going to game plan to make EJ beat them. They're gonna load up the box and leave their CBs on Revis Island. It's gonna be up to EJ to make the throws to beat them I personally cannot wait for them to do that. I truly believe our WR core will have a field day if you let them run around in single coverage. They won't load the box long.
beerme1 Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 I personally cannot wait for them to do that. I truly believe our WR core will have a field day if you let them run around in single coverage. They won't load the box long. Yes. Game manager blah blah blah. Dude is twelve games into his career and like you, I love the thought of leaving our skill players in single coverage!! I think our line is doing enough that EJ will be just fine in the art of game management! That art is to win. Just win.
John from Riverside Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 Murph needs to look at the red zone percentage I think i read where the Bills are 28th in the league in red zone percentage or was that 3rd downs can't remember exactly but either one is not good so he is managing the game & is not a elite QB talent . Wake up Murph …. Those little poison pills in your comments.....red zone percentage does not boil down to the "talent" of EJ........there are several different factors involved here.
billsfan89 Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 I would say that EJ is being used is in a conservative game managing manner. But I don't think that's bad. The guy is a young QB with a good amount of talent around him. Ask for him to play in a context that helps him develop and the team win. Its a lot easier to ask the guy to be a conservative type player now and then slowly open up what he is doing later on in the season and his career, then to lean on him too much and collapse his confidence.
Dr. Fong Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 Teams, like NE, are going to game plan to make EJ beat them. They're gonna load up the box and leave their CBs on Revis Island. It's gonna be up to EJ to make the throws to beat them Exactly right. In the past Bills teams have folded once this strategy was employed. Hopefully this team is different. If they are EJ is going to have to throw down the field when he's needed in a way that we haven't seen a QB do since Bledsoe was around.
Big Blitz Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 Isnt every QB a game manager? Code for "he sucks but his team is awesome." B.S. Right now EJ is making the right decisions, he's getting rid of the ball, not turning it over, making plays, and all the while looks very confident in the pocket. You know, out playing the other guy. It's a shame that all the EJ bashing just can't allow us to sit back and enjoy watching this kid develop. Instead we dissect every pass. Or every "check down." Btw, there are check downs and there are panic checkdowns. EJs have been the former. He's going to have a bad day. He's going to make bad throws. Remember, the plan is to develop and see what we have by seasons end. And so far so good. Can't wait till Sunday!
JESSEFEFFER Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 To me "game manager" is all about how agressively a coaching staff thinks about their offensive play calling. Run first, patient teams with defenses and special teams units that are succeeding and that are developing a young QB want a game manager performance. It means their game plan has worked. If their plans work then there is no reason for their still developing QB to make 40 pass attempts. When things are going well in all three phases, as they have so far, EJ will look like a game manager and the Bills will likely win. If not then circumstances will dictate that they need him to play more agressively. So, the difference is between what they ask of a QB while the game is going well and what he is actually capable of doing when things aren't going well. True game managers typically have no upside and are limited by their talent. I think Murph is right in that EJ is limited by design and circumstance but he can do more when circumstances change. It will be interesting to see just how much he can do and how soon he will show us.
GunnerBill Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 I think Big Ben's first two years are a good comparitor for EJ. If I was describing him at this moment in time, in terms of what I see him as NOW - he is a game manager who has shown an ability to be clutch (Carolina, Atlanta, Chicago and I'm sure I'm forgetting one). That is exactly what Big Ben did in those early years. I know what Murph is saying and I do think people get very hung up on the "game manager" term.... I think that the majority of good QBs in this league are game managers to some degree. There are some "boom or bust" QBs.... Romo springs to mind.... but they don't win a great deal.
HamSandwhich Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 EJ is in the game manager mode right now, as it is the next step in his process. The hope is that he gets a little more of the reigns as time goes on and he takes it upon his shoulders more with success. That would be the next step. Its all a process. That's just my opinion.
skibum Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 (edited) "Game Manager" is the most overused and inane term in football today. Every QB is a game manager. They run the plays as they are called. Run, throw, whatever. It's not like EJ has some special instructions to limit his pass attempts. It's as annoying as the term "Puck-possession team" is for hockey. Every team is a puck-posession team. If you don't possess the puck, you lose. Edited September 17, 2014 by skibum
jester43 Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 I was listening to "The John Murphy Show" tonight and one caller said we have been winning since E.J. is being utilized as a game manager. Murph disagreed pretty strongly and said he is too talented for that role. I think, as of right now, game manager is all I want him to be. It ain't broken, so no need to fix it. right, and John Murphy is not a shill for OBD.
machine gun kelly Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 Teams, like NE, are going to game plan to make EJ beat them. They're gonna load up the box and leave their CBs on Revis Island. It's gonna be up to EJ to make the throws to beat them You can bet Marrone will keep using the read option as a threat, but EJ will have to scare opposing defenses with some runs.
PaattMaann Posted September 17, 2014 Posted September 17, 2014 I don't know for certain and I don't think any of us do, but I don't think the play book is scaled down for EJ - I think all plays are available for Hackett to send in, I think our coaches are making a concentrated effort at putting EJ is winnable situations as far as limiting risk and getting to good down and distances.... They are establishing an identity (which they attempted to begin last year) - hard hitting, dominating defense and power run game....which by nature asks less of a starting QB It's an identity....you wouldn't do that with Drew Brees on the saints because that's not where their talent lies, but on the flip side you are seeing the Packers attempt to switch to more of a ball control, power offense because they have a work horse running back now and an oline that has not been able to keep Rodgers off his back for years now - you coach the team you've got - and EJ is playing his part to a T right now
Recommended Posts