Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 If you were only answering my argument regarding the slowness of this recovery then why did you say this regarding the linked article in the OP? What are the conclusions that the author draws that you want us to challenge? Calling on you to prove your own argument, which you are completely unwilling to do. You do still contend that this recovery is historically slow, right?
Chef Jim Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 Calling on you to prove your own argument, which you are completely unwilling to do. You do still contend that this recovery is historically slow, right? Then why is the line I quoted a response to Tom? You are so full of ****.
3rdnlng Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 Calling on you to prove your own argument, which you are completely unwilling to do. You do still contend that this recovery is historically slow, right? There is no recovery you stupid POS. Everything from the government and sources like you posted are bogus. All a person needs to do is actually look at the unemployment statistics to know what a scam the government is trying to perpetrate on the American people.
DC Tom Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 There is no recovery you stupid POS. Everything from the government and sources like you posted are bogus. All a person needs to do is actually look at the unemployment statistics to know what a scam the government is trying to perpetrate on the American people. How can you know whether there's a recovery or not? There's no historical reference for it.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 There is no recovery you stupid POS. Everything from the government and sources like you posted are bogus. All a person needs to do is actually look at the unemployment statistics to know what a scam the government is trying to perpetrate on the American people. You are truly a guiding intellectual light...
TPS Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 And just like that, someone posts a link to a source even more brain dead than Forbes. Well, the actual data is positive on the deficit.... http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-09-11/u-s-budget-deficit-for-11-months-shrinks-22-as-economy-grows.html As I've said would happen, deficits are down to sustainable levels, as the deficit/GDP ratio is <3%. The sky is still up there.... No sign of the (hyper) inflation bogeyman either...
Nanker Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 Longest jobless recovery in the history of the nation.
Rob's House Posted September 11, 2014 Posted September 11, 2014 What are the conclusions that the author draws that you want us to challenge? The only conclusion I saw was that Obama gives the author a boner. Calling on you to prove your own argument, which you are completely unwilling to do. You do still contend that this recovery is historically slow, right? The recovery isn't the only thing around here that's slow.
Nanker Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 You know, the unemployment rate would be around 3.5% if they didn't count African-Americans. They should probably drop them from the calculation like they drop the people who just stop looking for work because this regime doesn't care about either of those groups. But hey - bring in the hispanics 'cause they'll work for less!
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 Longest jobless recovery in the history of the nation. Oh, this is where Chef is getting his "information"
keepthefaith Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 Let's just hope that in a few years we can recover from this recovery.
IDBillzFan Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 You know, the unemployment rate would be around 3.5% if they didn't count African-Americans. And it would be something like 11% if you didn't count Texas.
keepthefaith Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 And it would be something like 11 14% if you didn't count Texas, North and South Dakota. Must drive liberals crazy that oil and gas states have the best employment numbers.
DC Tom Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 Must drive liberals crazy that oil and gas states have the best employment numbers. No, they just call it "energy independence" and credit Obama.
Chef Jim Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 BTW what does Obama outperforming Reagan on investing mean? Did he buy Apple at $25?
DC Tom Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 BTW what does Obama outperforming Reagan on investing mean? Did he buy Apple at $25? Doesn't matter. You can't compare the current market performance to historical performance. The S&P's made up of different companies now.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 Doesn't matter. You can't compare the current market performance to historical performance. The S&P's made up of different companies now. And the Fed is acting in a very different manner now than in early 1980's. Nothing to do with either president but very important to stock market.
DC Tom Posted September 13, 2014 Posted September 13, 2014 And the Fed is acting in a very different manner now than in early 1980's. Nothing to do with either president but very important to stock market. I was mocking you, you idiot.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted September 15, 2014 Posted September 15, 2014 So the recession Reagan had to deal with wasn't nearly as severe as the one Obama inherited from Bush. What does that do to the "historical average" I wonder?
Recommended Posts