Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looks like he might not make it. He has looked pretty good in the PS, but the Rams DE depth is too much. We need some depth pass rushers behind Mario and Hughes.

 

Ian Rapoport@RapSheet 10s

Interesting RT @MikeSilver: I do not expect Michael Sam to end up on the Rams' 53-man roster. But could absolutely end up on some team's 53

 

IMO - this team could actually use a distraction.

 

Not sure he's better than what the bills will be cutting.

  • Replies 210
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Sure...Let's sign a guy who couldn't make the Rams roster...because the one area that is short of talented players is the D-line.

 

Jeez.

 

Are you serious or just trolling?

Posted

Sure...Let's sign a guy who couldn't make the Rams roster...because the one area that is short of talented players is the D-line.

 

Jeez.

 

Are you serious or just trolling?

You say it as if being able to make the Rams is less prestigious than being able to make the Bills.

Posted

You say it as if being able to make the Rams is less prestigious than being able to make the Bills.

Yes I do...because it is. Bills D line is better than the Rams, and needs zero upgrading at this point. QBs on the other hand...or punters or return men...now you're talking.
Posted

Sure...Let's sign a guy who couldn't make the Rams roster...because the one area that is short of talented players is the D-line.

 

Jeez.

 

Are you serious or just trolling?

 

Special Teams help. Which we need. Can never have too much depth. He could be used as a situational pass rushing LB.

 

Only if Tebow is also on the team, because we don't have enough conflict on our team.

 

The only people creating conflict are the media, and other posters saying it would create conflict.

Posted

Yes I do...because it is. Bills D line is better than the Rams, and needs zero upgrading at this point. QBs on the other hand...or punters or return men...now you're talking.

 

If the Bills are better, its not by much. They have a pretty darn good one there too.

Posted

Sure...Let's sign a guy who couldn't make the Rams roster...because the one area that is short of talented players is the D-line.

 

Jeez.

 

Are you serious or just trolling?

the DT position is deep. The DE position is not.
Posted

Yes I do...because it is. Bills D line is better than the Rams, and needs zero upgrading at this point. QBs on the other hand...or punters or return men...now you're talking.

it doesn't matter which is better. It matters which is deeper at his position. He isn't a starter. He's a 7th rd pick that can provide depth.
Posted

Hell no. We shouldn't sign him, just like he has the right to be gay I have the right to disagree with it.

 

You're right, and we also have the right to flame you for your backward thinking.

Posted

Hell no. We shouldn't sign him, just like he has the right to be gay I have the right to disagree with it.

the question was about his play on the field and would it help our team
Posted

It's one thing to disagree with it, lots of people disagree with it, but its another thing to take it to the degree where you'd not hire him for that reason.

Posted

Hell no. We shouldn't sign him, just like he has the right to be gay I have the right to disagree with it.

Does he play "gay?" I mean, honestly, if a guy's job is to run after, wrap up, and tackle a bunch of dudes, shouldn't a gay guy be one of the very best at it?

Posted

it doesn't matter which is better. It matters which is deeper at his position. He isn't a starter. He's a 7th rd pick that can provide depth.

 

IM trying to figure out where all this depth is at LB/DE. If Hughes or one of our OLBs should go down for awhile. Who is the next man up?

Posted

I hire a martian if they'd help the team, but Marvin the Martian looked kinda small on the Bugs Bunny shows.

 

You say that like you have something against martians. Did you meet a bad martian at one point or something?

×
×
  • Create New...