Over 29 years of fanhood Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 On 8/29/2014 at 3:52 PM, YoloinOhio said: Looks like he might not make it. He has looked pretty good in the PS, but the Rams DE depth is too much. We need some depth pass rushers behind Mario and Hughes. Ian Rapoport @RapSheet 10s Interesting RT @MikeSilver: I do not expect Michael Sam to end up on the Rams' 53-man roster. But could absolutely end up on some team's 53 IMO - this team could actually use a distraction. Not sure he's better than what the bills will be cutting.
yungmack Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 Sure...Let's sign a guy who couldn't make the Rams roster...because the one area that is short of talented players is the D-line. Jeez. Are you serious or just trolling?
metzelaars_lives Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 On 8/29/2014 at 6:06 PM, yungmack said: Sure...Let's sign a guy who couldn't make the Rams roster...because the one area that is short of talented players is the D-line. Jeez. Are you serious or just trolling? You say it as if being able to make the Rams is less prestigious than being able to make the Bills.
yungmack Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 On 8/29/2014 at 6:23 PM, metzelaars_lives said: You say it as if being able to make the Rams is less prestigious than being able to make the Bills. Yes I do...because it is. Bills D line is better than the Rams, and needs zero upgrading at this point. QBs on the other hand...or punters or return men...now you're talking.
The Real Buffalo Joe Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 Only if Tebow is also on the team, because we don't have enough conflict on our team.
CountDorkula Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 On 8/29/2014 at 6:06 PM, yungmack said: Sure...Let's sign a guy who couldn't make the Rams roster...because the one area that is short of talented players is the D-line. Jeez. Are you serious or just trolling? Special Teams help. Which we need. Can never have too much depth. He could be used as a situational pass rushing LB. On 8/29/2014 at 6:35 PM, The Real Buffalo Joe said: Only if Tebow is also on the team, because we don't have enough conflict on our team. The only people creating conflict are the media, and other posters saying it would create conflict.
HamSandwhich Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 On 8/29/2014 at 6:35 PM, yungmack said: Yes I do...because it is. Bills D line is better than the Rams, and needs zero upgrading at this point. QBs on the other hand...or punters or return men...now you're talking. If the Bills are better, its not by much. They have a pretty darn good one there too.
YoloinOhio Posted August 29, 2014 Author Posted August 29, 2014 On 8/29/2014 at 6:06 PM, yungmack said: Sure...Let's sign a guy who couldn't make the Rams roster...because the one area that is short of talented players is the D-line. Jeez. Are you serious or just trolling? the DT position is deep. The DE position is not.
Pills -N- Bills Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 Hell no. We shouldn't sign him, just like he has the right to be gay I have the right to disagree with it.
CountDorkula Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 On 8/29/2014 at 7:13 PM, Pills -N- Bills said: Hell no. We shouldn't sign him, just like he has the right to be gay I have the right to disagree with it. Wow, just wow.
YoloinOhio Posted August 29, 2014 Author Posted August 29, 2014 On 8/29/2014 at 6:35 PM, yungmack said: Yes I do...because it is. Bills D line is better than the Rams, and needs zero upgrading at this point. QBs on the other hand...or punters or return men...now you're talking. it doesn't matter which is better. It matters which is deeper at his position. He isn't a starter. He's a 7th rd pick that can provide depth.
HamSandwhich Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 On 8/29/2014 at 7:13 PM, Pills -N- Bills said: Hell no. We shouldn't sign him, just like he has the right to be gay I have the right to disagree with it. You're right, and we also have the right to flame you for your backward thinking.
YoloinOhio Posted August 29, 2014 Author Posted August 29, 2014 On 8/29/2014 at 7:13 PM, Pills -N- Bills said: Hell no. We shouldn't sign him, just like he has the right to be gay I have the right to disagree with it. the question was about his play on the field and would it help our team
HamSandwhich Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 It's one thing to disagree with it, lots of people disagree with it, but its another thing to take it to the degree where you'd not hire him for that reason.
RuntheDamnBall Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 On 8/29/2014 at 7:13 PM, Pills -N- Bills said: Hell no. We shouldn't sign him, just like he has the right to be gay I have the right to disagree with it. Does he play "gay?" I mean, honestly, if a guy's job is to run after, wrap up, and tackle a bunch of dudes, shouldn't a gay guy be one of the very best at it?
Mike in Horseheads Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 On 8/29/2014 at 7:17 PM, YoloinOhio said: the question was about his play on the field and would it help our team I hire a martian if they'd help the team, but Marvin the Martian looked kinda small on the Bugs Bunny shows.
ALF Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 We need roster space till the OL and WR spots are settled. The DL is not a problem area
CountDorkula Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 On 8/29/2014 at 7:15 PM, YoloinOhio said: it doesn't matter which is better. It matters which is deeper at his position. He isn't a starter. He's a 7th rd pick that can provide depth. IM trying to figure out where all this depth is at LB/DE. If Hughes or one of our OLBs should go down for awhile. Who is the next man up?
HamSandwhich Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 On 8/29/2014 at 7:20 PM, Mike in Horseheads said: I hire a martian if they'd help the team, but Marvin the Martian looked kinda small on the Bugs Bunny shows. You say that like you have something against martians. Did you meet a bad martian at one point or something?
Recommended Posts