Buffaloed in Pa Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 He`s glass.Always this or that.Not needed. Lots of track stars out there.
CountryCletus Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 Word in the street is that it's herpes and will be back in action once they are repressed
BADOLBILZ Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 Nothing wrong with Roscoe 2.0 as your 4th/5th best WR (as it depends where you rank Chris Hogan). As to me depth chart is Williams, Woods, Watkins, Hogan/Goodwin, Easley and everyone else is either PS material or cut (see Graham). I disagree. Wouldn't want Roscoe back. The return game is only half as important as it was during Roscoe's day. Goodwin has to find a way to stay healthy or he will have a much shorter run that Roscoe.
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 The bills have to decide if they want a less talented guy 100% of the time or a more talented guy like 40% of the time.
Kelly the Dog Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 The bills have to decide if they want a less talented guy 100% of the time or a more talented guy like 40% of the time. Not really. Because they have five reliable guys. When he is healthy he plays, although he is a situational player anyway.
Mike in Horseheads Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 Goodwin gets hurt once per game without anyone even touching him. I think if he actually got tackled he would shatter into a million pieces AKA as Tim Connley
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 Not really. Because they have five reliable guys. When he is healthy he plays, although he is a situational player anyway. I have got to think it is a pain in the neck re roster spots and gameday actives when you have a guy like Goodwin who seems to go down during the game. I can't imagine they would activate every receiver, plus Easley.
Kelly the Dog Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 I have got to think it is a pain in the neck re roster spots and gameday actives when you have a guy like Goodwin who seems to go down during the game. I can't imagine they would activate every receiver, plus Easley. He's not going to get injured every game. Not even close. I was more referring to if he was out a couple games with an injury. His hand injury was a freak thing. He does pull hammies way too much though. He's actually very tough.
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 He's not going to get injured every game. Not even close. I was more referring to if he was out a couple games with an injury. His hand injury was a freak thing. He does pull hammies way too much though. He's actually very tough. Last year, I believe Goodwin left at least 5 games due to injury: hand, eye, knee, hamstring, elbow. So far in camp, he left practice due to hamstring and something I think relating to sickle cell, plus whatever happened yesterday. Some of this is bad luck (eye, hand), but that's a lot for a guy that is just a situational guy to begin with. Not complaining about it. It's just that I think the team needs to plan for it, including perhaps by dressing an extra receiver on game days.
Captain Caveman Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 Can't believe there is any thought of keeping Graham over Goodwin. If Goodwin is healthy for 6 games he'd give us more than 16 games of TJ.
Protocal69 Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 Well I heard Willie Mcginest say a couple of weeks ago that availability is more important than ability.
FireChan Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 Can't believe there is any thought of keeping Graham over Goodwin. If Goodwin is healthy for 6 games he'd give us more than 16 games of TJ. Except, looking at last years numbers, you're wrong. And why not keep both?
Kelly the Dog Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 Except, looking at last years numbers, you're wrong. And why not keep both? Because we are very likely not keeping seven WR. Watkins, Williams, woods, Goodwin, Hogan and Easley are almost locks.
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 Except, looking at last years numbers, you're wrong. And why not keep both? What's good about graham is that he is healthy and so he plays. What's bad about graham is that he is healthy and so he plays.
3rdand12 Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 It was asthma and sickle they took him out of camp. The boy is a gamer. Lets wait and see. Isnt it ironic a very notable track star has asthma ? and has pushed through it ? love the Goodwin. amazing mismatch potential as package player
VanCity Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 Here's the thing with the availability vs. performance debate. If he's not available, the Bills still dress Easley who has shown the ability to play WR if/when called to action. Goodwin may be a luxury, but he is easily affordable.
Alphadawg7 Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 Except, looking at last years numbers, you're wrong. And why not keep both? Why keep Graham? Goodwin is way more talented and we can't keep all the WR's. Watkins, Woods, Williams, Goodwin, Hogan, and Easley are locks. Thats 6 guys...only shot Graham has is IF we keep 7 WR's which I highly doubt...Graham is as good as done in Buffalo as I just don't see them keeping 7 and can't see any of the other guys getting cut.
Big C Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 Oddly, when Goodwin had to start last year against the Jets, he worked the short game and got hit a lot and didn't get hurt.
snamsnoops Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 Oddly, when Goodwin had to start last year against the Jets, he worked the short game and got hit a lot and didn't get hurt. I believe this was his best all around game. Drives me nuts when people say he is a one trick pony. Give the kid a chance, he definitely shown he has potential. Injuries do become a concern, but he has only been in the league a year. TJ has to go!
Recommended Posts