DC Tom Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 The kicker is I won't mind seeing Goodell go. It's just a shame that it will likely be for doing his job. It's not a shame at all. He set up a bull **** disciplinary system where he was the sole source of everything - judge, jury, executioner, appellate - which allowed him to make completely arbitrary and often contradictory decisions on policy. And now his capricious, half-assed excuse for a disciplinary process is leaving him hanging. I am puzzled why seeing the tape of him hitting her makes it worse than seeing her prone on the floor. PR. Only reason. The league doesn't care about domestic violence. They care about how they're viewed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 At some point, the owners have to realize criticism is going to fall back on them, right? Good thing that came happen to our owner! He's immune! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 (edited) Yes, because I'm the one seeking to impose my morality on others. That's not projection you goof To impose something on another is not projection. Projection is putting your qualities on to another Edit: how in the world did he know you didn't know what that term meant? Strange Edited September 10, 2014 by Crayola64 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 It's not a shame at all. He set up a bull **** disciplinary system where he was the sole source of everything - judge, jury, executioner, appellate - which allowed him to make completely arbitrary and often contradictory decisions on policy. And now his capricious, half-assed excuse for a disciplinary process is leaving him hanging. I agree with that. I actually said pretty much the same thing earlier. I just meant that he's likely to get fired in this immediate incident for protecting the league's interest. Completely agree about his idiotic penalty system putting him in this situation. That's not projection you goof To impose something on another is not projection. Projection is putting your qualities on to another Edit: how in the world did he know you didn't know what that term meant? Strange Is it possible for you to be any dumber? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 Is it possible for you to be any dumber? There you go again with that projection. Its getting sad, you should stop... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 Is it possible for you to be any dumber? It appears so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 It appears so. are you rob's house second account? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 @NBCSports According to a report, Janay Rice said to Ray Rice: "How could you do this to me? I’m the mother of your kid. http://tw.nbcsports.com/HlP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 @NBCSports According to a report, Janay Rice said to Ray Rice: "How could you do this to me? I’m the mother of your kid. http://tw.nbcsports.com/HlP Oh, so !@#$ing what? There is nothing in that "report" that is new, relevant information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 Oh, so !@#$ing what? There is nothing in that "report" that is new, relevant information. A witness that the nfl may not have talked to isn't new evidence? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 A witness that the nfl may not have talked to isn't new evidence? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 No. Why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 It's a good time for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 Why not? Because I'm smarter than you and I say so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numark3 Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 Because I'm smarter than you and I say so. yup, new witnesses aren't evidence. Good discussion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubs Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 I can't wait for the next thing to get outraged about!! I just bought a new pitchfork and a refurbished torch. I'm thinking around next Monday, once everyone feels self righteous enough and did nothing to actually change anything, it'll be time to get really upset about something else. Can't wait!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 I can't wait for the next thing to get outraged about!! I just bought a new pitchfork and a refurbished torch. I'm thinking around next Monday, once everyone feels self righteous enough and did nothing to actually change anything, it'll be time to get really upset about something else. Can't wait!!! :lol: Nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Because I'm smarter than you and I say so. well i guess its good night then. Thanks guys. see y'all tomorow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 I agree with that. I actually said pretty much the same thing earlier. I just meant that he's likely to get fired in this immediate incident for protecting the league's interest. Completely agree about his idiotic penalty system putting him in this situation. Is it possible for you to be any dumber? Character matters--isn't that what Goodell means when he says things like "protect the shield"? Or is that only for the rubes, and doesn't apply to His Highness and his billionaire backers when they get caught doing something scummy, like lying about an investigation, or intentionally hiding their heads in the sand? He did one or the other here, and both are bad. He needs to go.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Roger Goodbye. Thankfully I won't have to see him drunk during the Lombardi Trophy presentation again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts