Johnny Hammersticks Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 The sudden mediablitz on JBJ keeping the bills in town is scary. It almost seems as if they know they have the winning bid and are doing preemptive damage control on the backlash. 0% chance that group keeps them in town beyond the current lease. I hope I'm wrong, but this all certainly seems planned. Unfortunately, these are my exact thoughts/suspicions.
DJasper Probincrux III Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 It'd be kind of nice if the Canadian Dollar would tank in the next couple months. 1.00 USD =1.07 CAD right now. That already makes the Bills 70 million more expensive for the Canadians. Every penny is a 10 million dollar swing.
Beerball Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Trust em as far as I can throw em. Did I mention my bad back?
DJasper Probincrux III Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Trust em as far as I can throw em. Did I mention my bad back? I can help you build a catapult or a trebuchet....
HopefulFuture Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Anyone who is honest with themselves, forget others for a moment, but honest with themsevles, that believes an owner other than a locally vested individual or group are going to keep this team in Buffalo are only lying to themselves. If the team is bought by an entity, individual or group, that is not vested in the area, say goodbye to the team.
Kirby Jackson Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Anyone who is honest with themselves, forget others for a moment, but honest with themsevles, that believes an owner other than a locally vested individual or group are going to keep this team in Buffalo are only lying to themselves. If the team is bought by an entity, individual or group, that is not vested in the area, say goodbye to the team. That just isn't true. They cannot be bought by an entity in the NFL. You need 1 voice. In addition there are groups with no ties to WNY that plan on keeping the team. (This has nothing to do with JBJ).
DJasper Probincrux III Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Anyone who is honest with themselves, forget others for a moment, but honest with themsevles, that believes an owner other than a locally vested individual or group are going to keep this team in Buffalo are only lying to themselves. If the team is bought by an entity, individual or group, that is not vested in the area, say goodbye to the team. I believe that but I also believe that residency is optional. If I can get a person who was raised in the area who wants the team as a fan I'm good with that. Lots of people left B-Lo to make their money and hold similar beliefs as we do regarding the Bills staying in Buffalo.
HopefulFuture Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 That just isn't true. They cannot be bought by an entity in the NFL. You need 1 voice. In addition there are groups with no ties to WNY that plan on keeping the team. (This has nothing to do with JBJ). You believe what you will. I happen to believe differently. I've heard no direct talk from any group save the Galisano and Pegula groups that have a vested interest in the area. So yes, you are incorrect and it is true. You can attempt to say as loud as you like other wise, but show me the vested interested from any other known group. You can't. Say good bye to the team if they are not willing to invest in the area, because the only way to increase revenue (in case you haven't noticed, the NFL and the teams are a business first and foremost, even for the rich) is to find a way for yourself, as an individual owner, or a group to invest in the community in a larger scale to strengthen the market. Like I said, you only lie to yourself to believe otherwise. Stop thinking with passion, start using your brain. This is about money, nothing more, nothing less. The only 2 individuals that have been reported to be interested to buy the team with local vested interests are Pegula and Galisano. So please, just stop the nonsense talk. I believe that but I also believe that residency is optional. If I can get a person who was raised in the area who wants the team as a fan I'm good with that. Lots of people left B-Lo to make their money and hold similar beliefs as we do regarding the Bills staying in Buffalo. While that is possible, it's highly unlikely. There are philanthropists. But in the Bills case, there is a great deal of money at stake. I've seen the number 1.2 billion for the team bantered about, believe me, this team is going to sell for more than that, perhaps approaching the 2 billion mark. It's an NFL franchise, with a very attractive out clause in a handful of years. Power players take note of that for sure, you can bank on it.
DJasper Probincrux III Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 You believe what you will. I happen to believe differently. I've heard no direct talk from any group save the Galisano and Pegula groups that have a vested interest in the area. So yes, you are incorrect and it is true. You can attempt to say as loud as you like other wise, but show me the vested interested from any other known group. You can't. Say good bye to the team if they are not willing to invest in the area, because the only way to increase revenue (in case you haven't noticed, the NFL and the teams are a business first and foremost, even for the rich) is to find a way for yourself, as an individual owner, or a group to invest in the community in a larger scale to strengthen the market. Like I said, you only lie to yourself to believe otherwise. Stop thinking with passion, start using your brain. This is about money, nothing more, nothing less. The only 2 individuals that have been reported to be interested to buy the team with local vested interests are Pegula and Galisano. So please, just stop the nonsense talk. While that is possible, it's highly unlikely. There are philanthropists. But in the Bills case, there is a great deal of money at stake. I've seen the number 1.2 billion for the team bantered about, believe me, this team is going to sell for more than that, perhaps approaching the 2 billion mark. It's an NFL franchise, with a very attractive out clause in a handful of years. Power players take note of that for sure, you can bank on it. If I were presented with the choice of Trump, Tanenbaum and Gundlach I'd take Gundlach all day and twice on Sundays - that he lives in LA is irrelevant frankly. I'd obviously PREFER Pegula but given the choice of lesser evils I'll take the guy who grew up with the team over the guys who didnt
TheFunPolice Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 (edited) why do the owners have to be local? Ralph lived in Detroit! Pegula wasn't "local" when he bought the Sabres There's "not local" and then there's "been slobbering and drooling all over the team for a good decade, got their hooks partially in, and are THIS CLOSE to finally sealing the deal and getting what they have always wanted" Edited July 22, 2014 by TheFunPolice
HopefulFuture Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 If I were presented with the choice of Trump, Tanenbaum and Gundlach I'd take Gundlach all day and twice on Sundays - that he lives in LA is irrelevant frankly. I'd obviously PREFER Pegula but given the choice of lesser evils I'll take the guy who grew up with the team over the guys who didnt I would normally concur with your thoughts here. But I know hedge fund operators. Their MO has always been, to date, money. I'd like to believe that this individual is different, and, maybe he is, but in the end, I'm not willing to let myself be deluded into that thought process, it only skews my focus on the facts at hand for the franchise remaining in Buffalo. I to want Pegula by the way, but would be more than satisfied with Galisano. Both have proven worthy area investors who believe in the region, Pegula has even taken steps to substantially enhance the area in a sport, I believe Galisano learned something from that and would be willing to do so as well.
DJasper Probincrux III Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 (edited) I would normally concur with your thoughts here. But I know hedge fund operators. Their MO has always been, to date, money. I'd like to believe that this individual is different, and, maybe he is, but in the end, I'm not willing to let myself be deluded into that thought process, it only skews my focus on the facts at hand for the franchise remaining in Buffalo. I to want Pegula by the way, but would be more than satisfied with Galisano. Both have proven worthy area investors who believe in the region, Pegula has even taken steps to substantially enhance the area in a sport, I believe Galisano learned something from that and would be willing to do so as well. So given Trump, Tanenbaum or Gundlach who would YOU take? Also, it's not that I'd be displeased with Golisano it's moreso that he's already in his 70's and given my druthers I'd like someone younger. If I'm honest the Briere/Drury thing still nags at me as well. Edited July 22, 2014 by DJasper Probincrux III
HopefulFuture Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 why do the owners have to be local? Ralph lived in Detroit! Pegula wasn't "local" when he bought the Sabres There's "not local" and then there's "been slobbering and drooling all over the team for a good decade, got their hooks partially in, and are THIS CLOSE to finally sealing the deal and getting what they have always wanted" You are correct in so far as RW not being local, but then again, that's an after thought as he is gone and the team remained in what he referred to as his "second city" due to his love for the region. That individual no longer exists, god rest his soul. Pegula is local however, not directly, but through family ties and he has proven to be more than willing to invest in the region, see Harbor Center for details. Galisano has been invested in the region because he built a defining business from the region and take a look at what he did for the other pro sports franchise in the area. He turned down lucrative offers from individuals known to want to move that franchise to fine the "right guy" for the franchise. If you don't believe these 2 individuals are invested in the WNY region, then may I suggest you research the situations. It will help a great deal to see where these 2 individuals sit in so far as WNY are concerned. And yes, I would have moved to florida as well if I had that kind of cash and NY was raping me income tax wise, but look, his business remains, kind of makes you go hmmmmmm.........doesn't it now, or at least it should. So given Trump, Tanenbaum or Gundlach who would YOU take? Also, it's not that I'd be displeased with Golisano it's moreso that he's already in his 70's and given my druthers I'd like someone younger. If I'm honest the Briere/Drury thing still nags at me as well. Honestly, I would go with Trump. Believe it or not, I believe him when he says he'd keep the team in Buffalo, It's an ego thing with him, a challenge as well. He feels up to the task, and he most likely is. As for the D/B scenario, I'm not stating Galisano made the right choices with partners and/or management of the franchise, merely that he was willing to leave money on the table to ensure the franchises existence in WNY, that alone speaks volumes to me.
DJasper Probincrux III Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 You are correct in so far as RW not being local, but then again, that's an after thought as he is gone and the team remained in what he referred to as his "second city" due to his love for the region. That individual no longer exists, god rest his soul. Pegula is local however, not directly, but through family ties and he has proven to be more than willing to invest in the region, see Harbor Center for details. Galisano has been invested in the region because he built a defining business from the region and take a look at what he did for the other pro sports franchise in the area. He turned down lucrative offers from individuals known to want to move that franchise to fine the "right guy" for the franchise. If you don't believe these 2 individuals are invested in the WNY region, then may I suggest you research the situations. It will help a great deal to see where these 2 individuals sit in so far as WNY are concerned. And yes, I would have moved to florida as well if I had that kind of cash and NY was raping me income tax wise, but look, his business remains, kind of makes you go hmmmmmm.........doesn't it now, or at least it should. Honestly, I would go with Trump. Believe it or not, I believe him when he says he'd keep the team in Buffalo, It's an ego thing with him, a challenge as well. He feels up to the task, and he most likely is. As for the D/B scenario, I'm not stating Galisano made the right choices with partners and/or management of the franchise, merely that he was willing to leave money on the table to ensure the franchises existence in WNY, that alone speaks volumes to me. You could be right about Trump. There are several issues with a bid from him. His gambling interests, his personality, and that whole USFL thing don't really work in his favor. That being said, you know that we'd have a loud voice stumping for us in owners meetings. RE: The USFL, i don't see any of the legacy ownership groups voting to approve him.
Bob in Mich Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 You could be right about Trump. There are several issues with a bid from him. His gambling interests, his personality, and that whole USFL thing don't really work in his favor. That being said, you know that we'd have a loud voice stumping for us in owners meetings. RE: The USFL, i don't see any of the legacy ownership groups voting to approve him. To me Trump seems to be mostly hot air, always looking for a way to push himself into the public eye. If you were the other owners, would you want to have the accompanying Donald Circus at every owners' meeting? They would need to be pretty much out of options to pick The Donald, imo
HopefulFuture Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 You could be right about Trump. There are several issues with a bid from him. His gambling interests, his personality, and that whole USFL thing don't really work in his favor. That being said, you know that we'd have a loud voice stumping for us in owners meetings. RE: The USFL, i don't see any of the legacy ownership groups voting to approve him. Well, you didn't ask me if he would be approved, only what my choice would be amongst the 3 you gave, out of them, he is the one that I would look to the most. The reasoning for me is simple, he doesn't back down from a challenge and he backs up what he says. I've never known Trump to shy away from what he stands for or believes in or has publicly stated. The other 2 choices you gave I've just never seen them as serious purchasers, not when you have other major players in the game. To me, in any event, it will come down to 2 sets of groups. Pegula and Galisano on the local front, JBJ/Rogers and an as yet to be named individual on the other front. Don't ask me why I feel this to be the case, just know that I feel that will be the case. And, a stadium will be coming with the 2 local front guys. As for the others, that remains to be seen as of yet as I am unaware if they pitched one to the NFL.
DJasper Probincrux III Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 To me Trump seems to be mostly hot air, always looking for a way to push himself into the public eye. If you were the other owners, would you want to have the accompanying Donald Circus at every owners' meeting? They would need to be pretty much out of options to pick The Donald, imo They tolerate Jerry Jones and I think Jones would vote for him.
TheFunPolice Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Bills Gates should buy them..... Paul Allen did it, why not Gates? I think he has the dough.....
HopefulFuture Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Bills Gates should buy them..... Paul Allen did it, why not Gates? I think he has the dough..... Gates no longer has the liquidity to do so. Yes, he retained some of his wealth, but a majority of it is now vested in his foundation, which by the way, creates a nifty tax shelter for those monies. Interesting isn't it.
DJasper Probincrux III Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Well, you didn't ask me if he would be approved, only what my choice would be amongst the 3 you gave, out of them, he is the one that I would look to the most. The reasoning for me is simple, he doesn't back down from a challenge and he backs up what he says. I've never known Trump to shy away from what he stands for or believes in or has publicly stated. The other 2 choices you gave I've just never seen them as serious purchasers, not when you have other major players in the game. To me, in any event, it will come down to 2 sets of groups. Pegula and Galisano on the local front, JBJ/Rogers and an as yet to be named individual on the other front. Don't ask me why I feel this to be the case, just know that I feel that will be the case. And, a stadium will be coming with the 2 local front guys. As for the others, that remains to be seen as of yet as I am unaware if they pitched one to the NFL. Rogers and Tanenbaum are part of the same group IIRC. There is only one Toronto group.
Recommended Posts