Chef Jim Posted May 16, 2017 Posted May 16, 2017 THROW you out of a car, moron. Nobody wants to run you over with one. We just respect our vehicles too much. No i responded to your "throw him out of the car" with " then run him over". I didn't say whose vehicle I was going to use however. A steamroller is considered a vehicle right?
DC Tom Posted May 16, 2017 Posted May 16, 2017 No i responded to your "throw him out of the car" with " then run him over". I didn't say whose vehicle I was going to use however. A steamroller is considered a vehicle right? Technically, no. A vehicle is a conveyance used for the transport of people or goods. A steam roller does not transport people or goods, it is used in the creation of paved surfaces. As such, it's not properly considered a "vehicle," but "heavy engineering equipment." Much like how a "shovel" and "entrenching tool" are not the same thing.
Chef Jim Posted May 16, 2017 Posted May 16, 2017 Technically, no. A vehicle is a conveyance used for the transport of people or goods. A steam roller does not transport people or goods, it is used in the creation of paved surfaces. As such, it's not properly considered a "vehicle," but "heavy engineering equipment." Much like how a "shovel" and "entrenching tool" are not the same thing. So you want me to beat him over the head with a shovel?
grinreaper Posted May 16, 2017 Posted May 16, 2017 (edited) Is that worse than wanting to run me over with a car? Huh, turd breath? If he ran you over with a car schitforbrains, then who would be turd breath then? Can you imagine the threat to the environment coming out of your mouth? Edited May 16, 2017 by grinreaper
Tiberius Posted May 16, 2017 Posted May 16, 2017 Technically, no. A vehicle is a conveyance used for the transport of people or goods. A steam roller does not transport people or goods, it is used in the creation of paved surfaces. As such, it's not properly considered a "vehicle," but "heavy engineering equipment." Much like how a "shovel" and "entrenching tool" are not the same thing. Obfuscation alert!
DC Tom Posted May 16, 2017 Posted May 16, 2017 Obfuscation alert! Really? THAT is what you're going to go with here?
Chef Jim Posted May 16, 2017 Posted May 16, 2017 Really? THAT is what you're going to go with here? How about a pickaxe? As I said I'm easy.
Tiberius Posted May 16, 2017 Posted May 16, 2017 Really? THAT is what you're going to go with here? Technically, yes I am! :/
DC Tom Posted May 16, 2017 Posted May 16, 2017 How about a pickaxe? As I said I'm easy. No, that's not a vehicle either.
Joe Miner Posted May 17, 2017 Posted May 17, 2017 Really? THAT is what you're going to go with here? He's also a bot with a limited number of responses. Unfortunately he's just a ****ty bot.
Bob in Mich Posted May 19, 2017 Author Posted May 19, 2017 (edited) Survey of Canadian medical cannabis consumers shows them often replacing pharmaceuticals with cannabis. https://www.leafly.com/news/science-tech/cannabis-replacing-pharmaceuticals-canada from the article Breaking down the results by drug classes, Lucas and Walsh found that: 30% of respondents replaced opioids with cannabis 16% replaced benzodiazepines 12% replaced antidepressants The substitution effect reaches beyond just the medicine cabinet; cannabis also helped patients curb other types of substance use: 25% of respondents replaced alcohol with cannabis 12% of respondents replaced cigarettes/tobacco with cannabis 3% of respondents replaced illicit drugs with cannabis Edited May 19, 2017 by Bob in Mich
Chef Jim Posted May 19, 2017 Posted May 19, 2017 Survey of Canadian medical cannabis consumers shows them often replacing pharmaceuticals with cannabis. https://www.leafly.com/news/science-tech/cannabis-replacing-pharmaceuticals-canada from the article Breaking down the results by drug classes, Lucas and Walsh found that: 30% of respondents replaced opioids with cannabis 16% replaced benzodiazepines 12% replaced antidepressants The reason? “Less adverse side effects,” said 39% of patients. Others responded that cannabis was safer (27%) and more effective in treating symptoms (16%). That's some kick ass success ratios right there baby!
reddogblitz Posted May 19, 2017 Posted May 19, 2017 The reason? “Less adverse side effects,” said 39% of patients. Others responded that cannabis was safer (27%) and more effective in treating symptoms (16%). That's some kick ass success ratios right there baby! Just curious Chef. Does it help you with your symptoms?
Chef Jim Posted May 19, 2017 Posted May 19, 2017 Just curious Chef. Does it help you with your symptoms? Nope. As I've mentioned here (and elsewhere) several times I originally got my MM card due to major back pain. Didn't do a damn thing. So I opted for surgery and am 100% pain free. I do smoke because I don't drink anymore and it is a very good substitute for that. It will be interesting when it is accessible for recreational use here in CA likely in 2018. Though it was passed for recreational use CA is still trying to figure it out and you still need a MM card to purchase. I was talking with my wife about how acceptable it will be at that time. While I'm at our annual awards party while everyone is boozing it up how will people look at me when I pull out my pipe and fire it up?
Bob in Mich Posted May 19, 2017 Author Posted May 19, 2017 (edited) A mindless stoner. Just like you accuse me of being. Gotta be right, right? Edited May 19, 2017 by Bob in Mich
Chef Jim Posted May 19, 2017 Posted May 19, 2017 A mindless stoner. Just like you accuse me of being. Gotta be right, right? No I accuse you of peddling snake oil.
reddogblitz Posted May 19, 2017 Posted May 19, 2017 (edited) I just find it funny Chef that you are one of the biggest weed critics on TBD, yet you partake like the rest of us. Seems hypocritical but what do I know? That said, it's good that you're one of us. Edited May 19, 2017 by reddogblitz
DC Tom Posted May 19, 2017 Posted May 19, 2017 I just find it funny Chef that you are one of the biggest weed critics on TBD, yet you partake like the rest of us. Seems hypocritical but what do I know? That said, it's good that you're one of us. He's not a weed critic. He's an elitist stoner critic.
Chef Jim Posted May 19, 2017 Posted May 19, 2017 He's not a weed critic. He's an elitist stoner critic. And to clarify I criticize stoners I'm not a stoner elitist. See I can maintain while stoned while most stoners are....well stoners. We don't need any more of those around hence my desire to keep it liiegal.
Deranged Rhino Posted May 19, 2017 Posted May 19, 2017 And to clarify I criticize stoners I'm not a stoner elitist. See I can maintain while stoned while most stoners are....well stoners. We don't need any more of those around hence my desire to keep it liiegal.
Recommended Posts