YoloinOhio Posted July 19, 2014 Posted July 19, 2014 I think it would be wisest to consider him at S as well... Obviously the team knows him and his skills better than I do.... i think they like his size at slot corner against a lot of the WRs and TEs we are going to see. I think Robey plays a lot too but his size is a disadvantage against the big guys. Putting Graham at Safety prob not going to be much better than a guy like Duke Williams and then losing him at slot corner... I think it does make sense. But if we see an injury at safety he could play in a pinch.
CountryCletus Posted July 19, 2014 Posted July 19, 2014 i think they like his size at slot corner against a lot of the WRs and TEs we are going to see. I think Robey plays a lot too but his size is a disadvantage against the big guys. Putting Graham at Safety prob not going to be much better than a guy like Duke Williams and then losing him at slot corner... I think it does make sense. But if we see an injury at safety he could play in a pinch. I have no idea how I didn't take that into consideration... Great point and I retract my last...
ChanOverChin Posted July 19, 2014 Posted July 19, 2014 From Rodak's list, the guys on the fringe are: Tuel, Summers, Hogan, Dombrowski, Bryant, Wynn, Charles, R. Johnson, Meeks. No guarantee the Bills take 3 QBs. Dixon is not a FB, and thus, won't be used like one. Pears and Henderson could both make it in addition to the 8 OLs that are listed. Moorman is not the player he used to be, but could still make it. TJ Graham vs Hogan. The difference is that Hogan catches everything and can play ST. Graham drops too many balls. Not much completion for Bryant, Charles, and Wynn, but that doesn't mean that all 3 make it. Without Alonso we're a lil thin at LB. Sylvester vs R. Johnson for the #6 LB spot. Meeks vs Ladler for the #4 safety spot. There's a better than 50% chance that Hopkins sticks as a second K because he would be invaluable if he can prevent KO returns 98% of the time.
boyst Posted July 19, 2014 Posted July 19, 2014 From Rodak's list, the guys on the fringe are: Tuel, Summers, Hogan, Dombrowski, Bryant, Wynn, Charles, R. Johnson, Meeks. No guarantee the Bills take 3 QBs. Dixon is not a FB, and thus, won't be used like one. Pears and Henderson could both make it in addition to the 8 OLs that are listed. Moorman is not the player he used to be, but could still make it. TJ Graham vs Hogan. The difference is that Hogan catches everything and can play ST. Graham drops too many balls. Not much completion for Bryant, Charles, and Wynn, but that doesn't mean that all 3 make it. Without Alonso we're a lil thin at LB. Sylvester vs R. Johnson for the #6 LB spot. Meeks vs Ladler for the #4 safety spot. There's a better than 50% chance that Hopkins sticks as a second K because he would be invaluable if he can prevent KO returns 98% of the time. ya know, if you didn't include that Rodhack said that, I'd have seriously considered it. But that he did say all of this stuff makes me reconsider every bit of it. He was on ESPN Friday talking about the Bills and said absolutely nothing. Said that the Bills need to rely on a QB who can pass the ball and play good, we have to have a good defense, blablabla, common sense things that you say about any football team in the world. Rodhack is a disgrace to journalism.
The Jokeman Posted July 19, 2014 Posted July 19, 2014 Me either CBF Yet because he has PS eligibility left it make more sense to cut him and let him develop on the PS then use a roster spot on him. The only way I see him in the top 3 if something happens to the health of Chandler, Smith or Moeaki.
Big C Posted July 19, 2014 Posted July 19, 2014 Yet because he has PS eligibility left it make more sense to cut him and let him develop on the PS then use a roster spot on him. The only way I see him in the top 3 if something happens to the health of Chandler, Smith or Moeaki. He suited up for 9 games. Doesn't that make him ineligible?
ChanOverChin Posted July 19, 2014 Posted July 19, 2014 jboys, You misunderstood. Those WERE my comments. I was just referencing his projected roster.
CountryCletus Posted July 19, 2014 Posted July 19, 2014 we are just loaded! NOT Where do you suggest that there is a proven need that hasn't been addressed?
YoloinOhio Posted July 19, 2014 Posted July 19, 2014 we are just loaded! NOT we actually are.... Just need good, consistent, healthy QB.
Mark Vader Posted July 19, 2014 Posted July 19, 2014 Where do you suggest that there is a proven need that hasn't been addressed? Depth at QB, TE & DE are a concern.
The Jokeman Posted July 20, 2014 Posted July 20, 2014 He suited up for 9 games. Doesn't that make him ineligible? I didn't realize he dressed in 9 games, if so then he'd be ineligible as If a player has one accrued season, they can still be practice squad eligible if they were on the 45-man active gameday roster for less than nine regular season games. per http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/8/31/4677982/nfl-practice-squad-salary-rules-eligibility
playman Posted July 20, 2014 Posted July 20, 2014 henderson will beat out legursky if he keeps his head straight. and i don´t now about lee smith. a pure blocking TE? you can always go tackle eligible if you want more blocking.
3rdand12 Posted July 20, 2014 Posted July 20, 2014 henderson will beat out legursky if he keeps his head straight. and i don´t now about lee smith. a pure blocking TE? you can always go tackle eligible if you want more blocking. Henderson may not be in competition with Legursky. I think Doug is trying out as the best backup to Woods and in EXTREME emergency guard ( ) Hairston is a mystery right now. But I might think they are playing for a back up or better yet swing tackle . I dont know how they hide Seantrel on the PS . This O line is going to be very interesting to sort out for Marrone and Nate . any one think they will hide a cordy glenn up the sleeve , bring him back later in the season for the playoff run ? Does he count against the roster currently ? Lee Smith is a lock imo . shame they may not keep Gragg as the 4th te . he has potential
playman Posted July 20, 2014 Posted July 20, 2014 i meant beat out for a spot. not at guard. and ubrik has done ok when at C.
Recommended Posts