DC Tom Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 (edited) I didn't start the thread You posted this: The problem is killers get guns too easily. Easy access to guns helps cop killers. That's my only point. You banging your head in frustration to your own straw man is funny He asked you how you would do that. Stop being such a !@#$ing twerp. Edited December 2, 2016 by DC Tom
IDBillzFan Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 You posted this: He asked you how you would do that. Stop being such a !@#$ing twerp. Because he simply doesn't have the guts to openly admit here what he believes: that the second amendment should be abolished and all guns should be confiscated except from police and military.
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 I didn't start the thread I see so the game now is you only answers questions in threads you started. And you wondered why I
Tiberius Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 I see so the game now is you only answers questions in threads you started. And you wondered why I Well, more guns won't stop the shooting of the police
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 Well, more guns won't stop the shooting of the police So I assume the converse of that is true in your mind. If so how do you propose to fix that? (he's asks knowing he won't get a straight answer)
Tiberius Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 So I assume the converse of that is true in your mind. If so how do you propose to fix that? (he's asks knowing he won't get a straight answer) Assume away!
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 Assume away! I have to assume because you're either to dumb, chicken or both to tell us what you're thinking with regard to reducing criminal gun violence.
Tiberius Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 I have to assume because you're either to dumb, chicken or both to tell us what you're thinking with regard to reducing criminal gun violence. My point went over your head. I was basically arguing that if you are going to have a society flooded with guns, cops are obviously going to be shot. You agree?
B-Man Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 CIVIL RIGHTS: Democrats promise to kill any national conceal carry reciprocity agreement in the senate. Imagine having this debate over which places you could speak freely in, and in which other places you had better watch yourself. Oh, wait… .
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 My point went over your head. I was basically arguing that if you are going to have a society flooded with guns, cops are obviously going to be shot. You agree? Was society flooded with 50% more guns in 2016 than 2015?
Tiberius Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 Was society flooded with 50% more guns in 2016 than 2015? Does a ticking time bomb explode on the first tick?
Chef Jim Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 Does a ticking time bomb explode on the first tick? Wow that's deep. So what's your solution the gun issue?
Deranged Rhino Posted December 3, 2016 Posted December 3, 2016 (edited) Wow that's deep. So what's your solution the gun issue? I've always been partial to this solution: (NSFW due to language) Edited December 3, 2016 by Deranged Rhino
/dev/null Posted December 3, 2016 Posted December 3, 2016 (edited) I've always been partial to this solution: (NSFW due to language) How very Progressive If ammo is affordable, how does a new shooter learn to aim and handle a firearm safely? Then again, if something like that happened I'd be sitting on a gold mines worth of 22, 38, 5.56, and 30-06 Edited December 3, 2016 by /dev/null
boyst Posted December 3, 2016 Posted December 3, 2016 Do i get to laugh my ass off when McKnight was high on PCP and charging the guy before shot. Then on the ground and trying to bite the guys ankles.
Deranged Rhino Posted December 3, 2016 Posted December 3, 2016 How very Progressive If ammo is affordable, how does a new shooter learn to aim and handle a firearm safely? Then again, if something like that happened I'd be sitting on a gold mines worth of 22, 38, 5.56, and 30-06
North Buffalo Posted December 3, 2016 Posted December 3, 2016 Guns are much like political parties: the ideal amount of either is zero, but given the reality of both's existence, the next best amount is "billions". I like it and it is probably closer to the truth. Still background check for criminals and insane should probably instituted.
Beef Jerky Posted December 3, 2016 Posted December 3, 2016 Too many people in this world anymore for guns. Unless they use those guns for mass genocide then the answer is zero. Does a ticking time bomb explode on the first tick? Depends if you set it for one second or not.
Nanker Posted December 3, 2016 Posted December 3, 2016 I like it and it is probably closer to the truth. Still background check for criminals and insane should probably instituted. What state do you live in? What are its gun purchasing requirements?
Chef Jim Posted December 3, 2016 Posted December 3, 2016 I like it and it is probably closer to the truth. Still background check for criminals and insane should probably instituted. There are already background checks and now here in California there are going to be background checks to buy ammo. How the hell is that going to work? What they need to do is have gun permits renewed every few years with a new background check some at that time. I'd have no problem with that.
Recommended Posts