Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Of course there should be a link included.

 

But don't hold your breath.

Now you tell me after I passed out half a dozen different times. 

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
3 hours ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

He's very active on Twitter these days. He does a drive-by here on occasion. I've been TBD for probably 20 years with Tom. He comes and goes. But Twitter seems to keep him busy. If you're not following politics, there are a schittton of nerds discussing things he loves...like historic wars, battles, ships, strategies, etc. 

Ok- I am not on Twitter so that explains why I don't see him much.

Posted

 

 

Michigan state representative escorted across Capitol Avenue by African Americans carrying ‘large rifles’

 

This post takes place in Michigan, but we’d like to take you back to the Second Amendment rally that took place in Virginia in January because we got a lot of hot takes on race from that one. Despite extensive photographic evidence to the contrary, we learned that all of the protesters were white men because non-white men wouldn’t be safe in that crowd. We also learned that those white men were racists defending gun rights “that don’t extend to black people.”

 

Any time there’s a protest where people are carrying firearms, there’s a deluge of tweets saying, “Imagine if those were African Americans” or “Imagine if those were Muslims” — carrying a firearm in plain sight is a sure sign of white privilege.

 

As Twitchy reported, protesters — sorry, “terrorists” — some armed, “stormed” the state capitol in Michigan April 30 to oppose a proposed extension to the state’s coronavirus lockdown. And of course, these terrorists were all white men exercising their white privilege.

Now it’s apparently news that an African American state representative was escorted to work by at least three black men carrying “large rifles.”

 

 

 

The responses (of course) are not what their fake narrative pushes.

 

 

Awesome, always encouraging to see citizens exercising their 2nd Amendment rights.

 

 

The press will support this... oddly.
I have no issue with it.

 

 

 

Good for them. #2A is for everyone.

 

 

 

Good. This is great!
I want all responsible American's to own guns. Carrying a weapon is not a sign of intent to do violence.

 

 

 

 

Who cares? Everyone has the right to bear arms. Don’t buy into the media’s racist bull####

 

 

 

 

 

 

#BlackGunsMatter

No one is upset, which is gonna upset them more.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
On 7/17/2014 at 2:58 PM, TakeYouToTasker said:

Guns are much like political parties: the ideal amount of either is zero, but given the reality of both's existence, the next best amount is "billions".

So true

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

The answer now is clearly more guns. 

 

Remember when the left would ask you "Why do you need an AR-15?"

 

Good times. Good times.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
17 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

Remember when the left would ask you "Why do you need an AR-15?"

 

Good times. Good times.

A single Ar-15 isn't going to protect anyone against the US military. A handgun would do a great job against a looter.

Posted
3 hours ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

A single Ar-15 isn't going to protect anyone against the US military. A handgun would do a great job against a looter.

 

Good thing they don't travel in groups, right?

  • Like (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...