B-Man Posted February 3, 2020 Posted February 3, 2020 GUN CONTROL IS ACTUALLY PEOPLE CONTROL, WHICH IS WHY THE LEFT IS SO PASSIONATE ABOUT IT: Anti-Gun States Sue to Stop First Amendment, Impose Controls on Firearms Information. . 1
Taro T Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 2 minutes ago, B-Man said: What would we do without media 'experts' That gun clearly can't be a Leftist. Firing upon being triggered is a rational response, haven't seen many of those when a Leftist is triggered, so ...
Dante Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 MSM doesn't give a hell about this shooting. Probably because it's real (drug related I would imagine) and who cares about that? https://www.oann.com/4-dead-in-indianapolis-apartment-shooting/ They would rather focus on a hoax mass shooting starring a bowl hair cut misfit. More political currency and fear porn in the effort to take away guns 1
3rdnlng Posted February 10, 2020 Posted February 10, 2020 https://www.foxnews.com/us/georgia-sheriffs-concealed-carry-sign-goes-viral?fbclid=IwAR0dsZaoHHBPVs74YPdMo_WIKeZoZystSjACRgPs1WVjwuZJNwUBp23wcUY
Taro T Posted February 13, 2020 Posted February 13, 2020 17 hours ago, B-Man said: I mourn the death of common-sense. . How the #### does that teacher manage to get out of bed each morning knowing that she's going to have to face 20 or so finger toting 5 year olds EVERY morning? (Well, except for weekends, and holidays, and vacations, and teach conference days, and the like.) Seriously, she has to face those mini-Nazis 180 times each year. She deserves a medal, or at least one of Bill Engvall's signs. The other parents that send their children to that school have to be wondering how in the hell they get their children out of that school if the administration is that obtuse. PLEASE tell us that was just some elaborate parody site and not a legitimate news story. SMH.
/dev/null Posted February 13, 2020 Posted February 13, 2020 3 hours ago, Taro T said: How the #### does that teacher manage to get out of bed each morning knowing that she's going to have to face 20 or so finger toting 5 year olds EVERY morning? (Well, except for weekends, and holidays, and vacations, and teach conference days, and the like.) Seriously, she has to face those mini-Nazis 180 times each year. She deserves a medal, or at least one of Bill Engvall's signs. The other parents that send their children to that school have to be wondering how in the hell they get their children out of that school if the administration is that obtuse. PLEASE tell us that was just some elaborate parody site and not a legitimate news story. SMH. KTLA is the CW affiliate in Los Angeles. Make all the #fakenews jokes or jabs that CW isn't a real network, but the story is legit 1
Taro T Posted February 13, 2020 Posted February 13, 2020 3 minutes ago, /dev/null said: KTLA is the CW affiliate in Los Angeles. Make all the #fakenews jokes or jabs that CW isn't a real network, but the story is legit Thanks. It looked like a legit site. So truly feel bad for the kids getting "educated" by those dingbats.
LeviF Posted February 14, 2020 Posted February 14, 2020 https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=171147947650886&substory_index=0&id=108224247276590 1 2 1
3rdnlng Posted February 14, 2020 Posted February 14, 2020 17 minutes ago, LeviF91 said: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=171147947650886&substory_index=0&id=108224247276590 And to think I thought this was a Publishers Clearing House ad.
/dev/null Posted February 15, 2020 Posted February 15, 2020 14 hours ago, B-Man said: The young lady on the left has a very nice form. Finger off the trigger and barrel is pointed in a safe direction The lady on the right is packing a nice pair of assets with what I suspect are after-market attachments 1 1
B-Man Posted February 17, 2020 Posted February 17, 2020 Ralph Northam’s ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban Just Crashed and Burned FTA: This isn’t a total victory, as several other, less consequential (but still unconstitutional) “gun control” laws have already passed. But, this was the one that sought to target a broad range of semi-automatic weapons, as well as their magazines. The huge protests that took place some months ago look to have actually worked. While Northam may not have to fear voters, there are Democrats in the General Assembly who will face a backlash in their less liberal areas. Some of them tried to save their own skin here. Still, the red flag law they’ve passed is expected to be codified and that’s a huge bludgeon for a government to wield. Unfortunately, some conservative voices like David French joined to champion such laws, apparently having no care for the obvious abuse that can and will come with them. That will likely be Northam’s next move now that his direct attack has failed. . 1
3rdnlng Posted February 17, 2020 Posted February 17, 2020 On 2/14/2020 at 11:25 PM, B-Man said: I said I was interested in "gun racks", but thanks for the upsell.
/dev/null Posted February 17, 2020 Posted February 17, 2020 44 minutes ago, B-Man said: Ralph Northam’s ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban Just Crashed and Burned FTA: This isn’t a total victory, as several other, less consequential (but still unconstitutional) “gun control” laws have already passed. But, this was the one that sought to target a broad range of semi-automatic weapons, as well as their magazines. The huge protests that took place some months ago look to have actually worked. While Northam may not have to fear voters, there are Democrats in the General Assembly who will face a backlash in their less liberal areas. Some of them tried to save their own skin here. Still, the red flag law they’ve passed is expected to be codified and that’s a huge bludgeon for a government to wield. Unfortunately, some conservative voices like David French joined to champion such laws, apparently having no care for the obvious abuse that can and will come with them. That will likely be Northam’s next move now that his direct attack has failed. . Gonna tell you the same thing I told my friends. Keep your powder dry, this isn't a victory. The bill was not defeated, it was shelved until next year 4 Democrats were allowed to vote no in order to save face for themselves. I suspect something else to consider is the Virginia Democrats great benefactor and sponsor is running for President and Virginia Democrats do not want the ire of the great unwashed deplorables to fall upon the billionaire who paid for their seats 1 2
Recommended Posts