Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

This is the ad, I guess the Republicans have to make a Latina women the evil one so that all the old people receiving socialist benefits can be afraid of socialism. This ad is so ignorant 

 

 

 

12 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

Almost as ignorant as the post above yours

 

 

 

If you two buffoons would read something you would have learned that the ad was not from the GOP and certainly was not racist,

 

But keep on parroting your dem points

 

4 hours ago, B-Man said:

Melting DOWN: AOC TOTALLY missed the point of New Faces GOP ad and her tweets shrieking about RACISM prove it

 

ABC apparently ran an ad for New Faces GOP that some on the Left found objectionable.

In other words, New Faces GOP ran a brutally honest ad about the dangers of socialism and Lefties lost their freakin’ minds over it.

Here’s the ad:

 

 

 

Basically socialism sucks.

 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, whether she likes it or not, has become the face of Socialist Democrats aka socialism.

And speaking of AOC, she clearly missed the point of the ad because she not only thinks Republicans ran it (they didn’t) but she also seems to think it was about racism and pandering to white supremacists.

 

 

 

 

Elizabeth Heng, who is neither white nor a white supremacist nor a man nor representative of the GOP, addressed AOC directly:

Not Republicans. Me. Are you really calling me a racist @aoc? I’m calling all Democrats out for supporting an evil ideology. Or are you just in Congress to hang out with celebrities and tweet out ridiculous ideas like the green new deal? https://twitter.com/aoc/status/1172323323641905165 

 

 

 

 

 

A Cambodian woman makes an ad highlighting the Cambodian Genocide/the horrors of socialism and @AOC has the audacity to call it "racist?"

Instead of responding to the content of the ad, #BoycottABC is now trying to bully tv networks into not running it.

 

Wonder why that is?

 

 

 

 

Edited by B-Man
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

Oh Horse crap, you can democracy will lead to the re-opening of the African Slave Trade in the same way. It's just a stupid argument. It's a Trumpian Argument. Just stupid 

Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

Just imagine what position he'll flip to when he learns he can't win a seat in the Senate either... 

 

 I know, why would Mexican Americans in Texas support this guy?? Oh wait, that's right, some right wing terrorist just tried to murder them with that weapon. You forgot that? 

Posted
15 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

If you two buffoons would read something you would have learned that the ad was not from the GOP and certainly was not racist,

 

But keep on parroting your dem points

 

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You can? Go for it. I want to hear this... 

 

Image result for popcorn ready gif

America allowed slavery, therefore Democracy is slavery! 

 

Fire, flames and all that, done 

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

How is she supporting genocide? This is all so stupid. 

 

Trump's people are sure desperate! :lol:

Posted
57 minutes ago, Chandemonium said:

I assumed we were talking .223 since this is an AR conversation and that’s the most popular AR chambering. My point remains that Beto thinks the round itself is too powerful for civilians to own, and yet you think even more powerful cartridges will be exempt from banning or confiscation. How do you reconcile that?

 

I thought you were talking about a different round.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

 

 

How is she supporting genocide? This is all so stupid. 

 

 

 

 

Wait,

 

are you telling the board that you posted this

 

45 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

This is the ad, I guess the Republicans have to make a Latina women the evil one so that all the old people receiving socialist benefits can be afraid of socialism. This ad is so ignorant 

 

 

 

and you don't understand how the Cambodian author could reference Genocide.

 

 

 

Did you even watch the ad, or did you post it assuming "republican Bias" sight unseen.

 

either way it's classic Gator ignorance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Wait,

 

are you telling the board that you posted this

 

 

and you don't understand how the Cambodian author could reference Genocide.

 

 

 

Did you even watch the ad, or did you post it assuming "republican Bias" sight unseen.

 

either way it's classic Gator ignorance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So AOC is for genocide? You guys are still living off the Pizzagate high you guys got from that one. Ignorant as hell. Can't wait until Trump loses and you cry like a little soiled diaper baby :lol:

Posted

THEY’RE UPSET BECAUSE ONLY LEFTISTS ARE SUPPOSED TO THREATEN VIOLENCE IF THEY DON’T GET THEIR WAY: 

 

New Republic: Conservatives: We’ll Spill Blood to Keep Our Guns. 

 

“‘There would be violence’ neatly elides what’s actually being claimed: Some gun-rights activists would murder government officials who try to enforce a duly passed law. This isn’t an extreme viewpoint among such gun enthusiasts. If anything, it’s one of their central tenets.”

 

What part of Molon Labe don’t you get? Well, probably all of it, given today’s dismal education system.

 

And a law that violates the Constitution — which gun confiscation absolutely would — isn’t a “duly passed law.” It’s a usurpation of authority. Funny that all these people who have been yammering about #Resistance and punching Nazis seem okay with the idea of laws that violate the Constitution, laws that are — of course — themselves enforced with guns and violence.

 

But should it come to that, which I doubt, I suspect it wouldn’t be the cops and troops enforcing this who would be targeted first.

 

UPDATE: A friend on Facebook comments:

Oh, good, you finally understand. I thought we were going to have to explain it to you using small words and simple pictograms.

It’s so tedious trying to explain the facts of life to the sort of dumbasses who think “shall not be infringed” means “maybe you could have a duck gun. If your doctor, your wife, and three of your neighbors agree.”

Harsh, but fair.

 
 
 
 
 
.
Posted
5 hours ago, B-Man said:

THEY’RE UPSET BECAUSE ONLY LEFTISTS ARE SUPPOSED TO THREATEN VIOLENCE IF THEY DON’T GET THEIR WAY: 

 

New Republic: Conservatives: We’ll Spill Blood to Keep Our Guns. 

 

“‘There would be violence’ neatly elides what’s actually being claimed: Some gun-rights activists would murder government officials who try to enforce a duly passed law. This isn’t an extreme viewpoint among such gun enthusiasts. If anything, it’s one of their central tenets.”

 

What part of Molon Labe don’t you get? Well, probably all of it, given today’s dismal education system.

 

And a law that violates the Constitution — which gun confiscation absolutely would — isn’t a “duly passed law.” It’s a usurpation of authority. Funny that all these people who have been yammering about #Resistance and punching Nazis seem okay with the idea of laws that violate the Constitution, laws that are — of course — themselves enforced with guns and violence.

 

But should it come to that, which I doubt, I suspect it wouldn’t be the cops and troops enforcing this who would be targeted first.

 

UPDATE: A friend on Facebook comments:

Oh, good, you finally understand. I thought we were going to have to explain it to you using small words and simple pictograms.

It’s so tedious trying to explain the facts of life to the sort of dumbasses who think “shall not be infringed” means “maybe you could have a duck gun. If your doctor, your wife, and three of your neighbors agree.”

Harsh, but fair.

 
 
 
 
 
.

 

I can all but guarantee you that it will not be the police that attempt to confiscate weapons. Most are firm believers in the 2nd Amendment and, no matter what orders given, would not participate.

 

The military on the other hand......

 

This country is heading for the bloodiest of all civil wars.

Posted

A gun is n assault weapon

A knife is an assault weapon

A baseball bat is an assault weapon

A fist is an assault weapon

Ban all of these?

Posted
4 minutes ago, Wacka said:

A gun is n assault weapon

A knife is an assault weapon

A baseball bat is an assault weapon

A fist is an assault weapon

Ban all of these?

Knives kill more people than ar-15's.  We should definitely ban those.

×
×
  • Create New...