What is better, no guns, or more guns?

[Figster]

1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Why not just embed the looney tunes?  

 

 

Works for me.

[bdutton]

7 minutes ago, Figster said:

Guns need to be tracked with an embedded GPS tracking device. If your gun doesn't carry the tracking device, you lose it. Develop/advance technology in public gun detection devices. Go through a Walmart entrance that can be locked down If certain weapons are detected. Install gun detectioon devices in the streets to indicate gun carriers.

 

You will never be able to keep track of every looney tune that wants to kill people, but we can damn sure do a better job keeping track of guns in the US IMO. 

Over 300 million guns in the us and you want to embed a gps tracking device in every one?  

 

[Figster]

 

1 minute ago, Hedge said:

 

Are you the same guy who thought all we needed to protect our southern border was a few dogs?

Absolutely, 

 

Dogs and drones...

[Figster]

Just now, bdutton said:

Over 300 million guns in the us and you want to embed a gps tracking device in every one?  

 

Eventually, yes

 

Its up to the owner to get the device installed or risk losing it.

 

Manufacturers would need to add the tracking device to all new guns. 

 

Right now when a gun gets stolen theres no way to stop the gun from harming the public in some way and its a never ending problem. 

[Koko78]

22 minutes ago, Figster said:

Guns need to be tracked with an embedded GPS tracking device. If your gun doesn't carry the tracking device, you lose it. Develop/advance technology in public gun detection devices. Go through a Walmart entrance that can be locked down If certain weapons are detected. Install gun detectioon devices in the streets to indicate gun carriers.

 

You will never be able to keep track of every looney tune that wants to kill people, but we can damn sure do a better job keeping track of guns in the US IMO. 

 

Well, that's one way to violate four different Amendments at the same time!

[3rdnlng]

1 minute ago, Figster said:

Eventually, yes

 

Its up to the owner to get the device installed or risk losing it.

 

Manufacturers would need to add the tracking device to all new guns. 

 

Right now when a gun gets stolen theres no way to stop the gun from harming the public in some way and its a never ending problem. 

Maybe we could just talk to the gun and convince it not to harm anyone.

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

1 minute ago, Figster said:

Eventually, yes

 

Its up to the owner to get the device installed or risk losing it.

 

Manufacturers would need to add the tracking device to all new guns. 

 

Right now when a gun gets stolen theres no way to stop the gun from harming the public in some way and its a never ending problem. 

"there's no way to stop the gun from harming the public?"  what the...?!  

 

you may be 2 fig newton's short of a full sleeve ?

[DC Tom]

21 minutes ago, Figster said:

Guns need to be tracked with an embedded GPS tracking device. If your gun doesn't carry the tracking device, you lose it. Develop/advance technology in public gun detection devices. Go through a Walmart entrance that can be locked down If certain weapons are detected. Install gun detectioon devices in the streets to indicate gun carriers.

 

You will never be able to keep track of every looney tune that wants to kill people, but we can damn sure do a better job keeping track of guns in the US IMO. 

 

Sounds like London.  

[Koko78]

14 minutes ago, Figster said:

 

Absolutely, 

 

Dogs and drones...

 

Why not combine them?

 

[3rdnlng]

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/22/nancy-pelosis-border-wall-alternative-includes-mow/

 

Nancy Pelosi has the solution-----------------------------------mow the grass at the border.

[Figster]

7 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

"there's no way to stop the gun from harming the public?"  what the...?!  

 

you may be 2 fig newton's short of a full sleeve ?

Well they did take the fig out of the Newton.

 

but yes, guns in the hands of criminals in many instances results in harm to the public,

 

If you can add two and two... 

Edited August 7, 2019 by Figster

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

Just now, 3rdnlng said:

Maybe we could just talk to the gun and convince it not to harm anyone.

Good thought but unworkable:

 

German guns are cold and distant, and to be frank they really just want to rule the world.

Italian guns are prone to emotional outbursts.

Irish guns are generally knee deep in the sauce by 10am.

Swiss guns, well they want to get a feel which way the winds are blowing before they commit to anything.

Russian guns?  yeah, good luck.

 

[Deranged Rhino]

3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/22/nancy-pelosis-border-wall-alternative-includes-mow/

 

Nancy Pelosi has the solution-----------------------------------mow the grass at the border.

 

But if they mow the grass, where are the feds supposed to put their genetically engineered ticks?! 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jul/16/pentagon-review-weaponised-ticks-lyme-disease

Edited August 7, 2019 by Deranged Rhino

[GaryPinC]

12 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

100% unConstitutional.

 

Can’t be done by law.

 

”Shall not be infringed”

 

Start there. Learn how to Amend the US Constitution.

 

Then, when that’s failed, pound sand.

Really?    Supreme Court decision DC vs Heller, upholding the 2nd amendment.  Page 2:

 

"2. Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56."

 

This of the majority opinion supporting the second amendment.  A nice way to show that you are 100% wrong.

[3rdnlng]

4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Good thought but unworkable:

 

German guns are cold and distant, and to be frank they really just want to rule the world.

Italian guns are prone to emotional outbursts.

Irish guns are generally knee deep in the sauce by 10am.

Swiss guns, well they want to get a feel which way the winds are blowing before they commit to anything.

Russian guns?  yeah, good luck.

 

Those are nothing like French Guns that have a reverse mode.

[B-Man]

 

 

"Dogs and Drones"

 

[Figster]

16 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Maybe we could just talk to the gun and convince it not to harm anyone.

I'll talk to it alright,

 

Tell me where your at, at all times, or your punk ass is getting melted down and made into a trash can so you can eat garbage.

[3rdnlng]

2 minutes ago, Figster said:

I'll talk to it alright,

 

Tell me where your at, at all times, or your punk ass is getting melted down and made into a trash can so you can eat garbage.

Be more precise and you'll avoid responses that mock you.

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

3 minutes ago, Figster said:

I'll talk to it alright,

 

Tell me where your at, at all times, or your punk ass is getting melted down and made into a trash can so you can eat garbage.

Figster = embedded

[Figster]

2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Be more precise and you'll avoid responses that mock you.

Its all good