ExiledInIllinois Posted April 15, 2019 Posted April 15, 2019 https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ny-alabama-gun-diaper-bag-20190415-v7hsmmntzngbfklydxt74ur54i-story.html?outputType=amp Look on bright side. Almost one less dimwit in Alabama voting AND one less future voter. Spin it however you want to.
Azalin Posted April 15, 2019 Posted April 15, 2019 1 hour ago, ExiledInIllinois said: https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ny-alabama-gun-diaper-bag-20190415-v7hsmmntzngbfklydxt74ur54i-story.html?outputType=amp Look on bright side. Almost one less dimwit in Alabama voting AND one less future voter. Spin it however you want to. Why would anyone need to spin that? You've done yeoman's work advocating against smart phones, because of all the people who hurt others because they text while driving. Or all you've done in the way of advocating for stiffer penalties for drinking and driving. Considering how consistent you've been on advocating personal responsibility with regard to alcohol and smartphones, how can anyone question your sincerity regarding gun ownership? I especially like the way you expressed thankfulness that the baby in that article is going to be okay. You complete douche. 2 1
ExiledInIllinois Posted April 15, 2019 Posted April 15, 2019 10 hours ago, Azalin said: Why would anyone need to spin that? You've done yeoman's work advocating against smart phones, because of all the people who hurt others because they text while driving. Or all you've done in the way of advocating for stiffer penalties for drinking and driving. Considering how consistent you've been on advocating personal responsibility with regard to alcohol and smartphones, how can anyone question your sincerity regarding gun ownership? I especially like the way you expressed thankfulness that the baby in that article is going to be okay. You complete douche. Who knows? They may vote Democrat.
3rdnlng Posted April 15, 2019 Posted April 15, 2019 56 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said: Who knows? They may vote Democrat. 1
/dev/null Posted April 21, 2019 Posted April 21, 2019 Second Amendment Sanctuary Counties https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-met-second-amendment-sanctuary-county-movement-illinois-20190416-story.html
Chef Jim Posted April 21, 2019 Posted April 21, 2019 42 minutes ago, /dev/null said: Second Amendment Sanctuary Counties https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-met-second-amendment-sanctuary-county-movement-illinois-20190416-story.html What the Effingham?
ExiledInIllinois Posted April 22, 2019 Posted April 22, 2019 Brought to you by the PPP gun lobby. The more times change, the more they stay the same. "PaPPa says it won't hurt us"
B-Man Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 ‘Leave the Poor Defenseless Act’: New Jersey governor proposes $550 fee to own and carry a gun . 1
Chef Jim Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 (edited) 7 hours ago, ExiledInIllinois said: Brought to you by the PPP gun lobby. The more times change, the more they stay the same. "PaPPa says it won't hurt us" Not sure what your point is. I guess this is just a case of “consider the source” and move on. Edited April 23, 2019 by Chef Jim
3rdnlng Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 1 hour ago, B-Man said: ‘Leave the Poor Defenseless Act’: New Jersey governor proposes $550 fee to own and carry a gun . Makes about as much legal sense as requiring a similar payment in order to vote.
/dev/null Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 6 hours ago, Chef Jim said: Not sure what your point is. I guess this is just a case of “consider the source” and move on. i'm not sure EII even knows what his point is these days 1
ExiledInIllinois Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 7 hours ago, Chef Jim said: Not sure what your point is. I guess this is just a case of “consider the source” and move on. Please DO consider the source. ?? I will explain to you, which I normally am not in a habit of doing. I like you and you illicit my pitty. Even a 100 years ago there was a problem with kids getting into firearms of dingbat gun owners (Papa, a.k.a: PPP, says it won't hurt us). The point is, they were trying to solve the problem then, 100 years ago, and still preach the selfish mentality of the individual arms owner with regard to their Constitutional right. It wasn't working then, and it surely isn't working now with a larger gun owning population busting at the seams. For such a seemily bright guy... You sure take the easy, lazy way out with the "consider the source" jibe... Low fruit comment. Thank you, I pray to God you save it for this place, your sloppy work habits that is.
Chef Jim Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 1 hour ago, ExiledInIllinois said: Please DO consider the source. ?? I will explain to you, which I normally am not in a habit of doing. I like you and you illicit my pitty. Even a 100 years ago there was a problem with kids getting into firearms of dingbat gun owners (Papa, a.k.a: PPP, says it won't hurt us). The point is, they were trying to solve the problem then, 100 years ago, and still preach the selfish mentality of the individual arms owner with regard to their Constitutional right. It wasn't working then, and it surely isn't working now with a larger gun owning population busting at the seams. For such a seemily bright guy... You sure take the easy, lazy way out with the "consider the source" jibe... Low fruit comment. Thank you, I pray to God you save it for this place, your sloppy work habits that is. So your point is guns kill people then, now and always will. Damn you’re ***** brilliant! And RESPONSIBLE gun owner knows how to own one safely. That has been and always will be the solution to the problem. And trying to understand your points is not sloppy work. It’s one of the most difficult jobs I’ve ever undertaken and failed on a regular basis. And I’m far from alone in that endeavor.
LeviF Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 10 hours ago, B-Man said: ‘Leave the Poor Defenseless Act’: New Jersey governor proposes $550 fee to own and carry a gun . Make no mistake: the restrictions on our God-given right to bear arms have always been about keeping guns out of the hands of the poor working class and minorities.
ExiledInIllinois Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 (edited) 44 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: So your point is guns kill people then, now and always will. Damn you’re ***** brilliant! And RESPONSIBLE gun owner knows how to own one safely. That has been and always will be the solution to the problem. And trying to understand your points is not sloppy work. It’s one of the most difficult jobs I’ve ever undertaken and failed on a regular basis. And I’m far from alone in that endeavor. No. (Not that brilliant, above my pay grade) Sorry. A responsible gun owner may have to take one for the team and be little less selfish. Because, when too many are irresponsible it spoils it for all. I understand that people have rights, no reason to hide be hide them. This isn't the stand that needs to be made so all our other rights hold. We are beyond that stage. Maybe this is where we disagree. I am simply not that primal. Call me naive, that's fine. Edited April 23, 2019 by ExiledInIllinois
IDBillzFan Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 3 hours ago, /dev/null said: i'm not sure EII even knows what his point is these days My wife's mother is somewhat eccentric. She can be talking about something, and then, like a file you click too fast on a old PC, she'll kind of spirals a bit, look off into the distance as if to study a bug on the wall -- you can almost see the hourglass spinning -- and then she'll suddenly blurt out a word that has nothing to do with the topic. "Well, you know, when we lived in Covina, we had a neighbor who used to....(pause, pause, pause, reboot, reboot, reboot and then, suddenly)...MEATBALL!" That's Exiled in a nutshell.
Chef Jim Posted April 23, 2019 Posted April 23, 2019 1 hour ago, ExiledInIllinois said: No. (Not that brilliant, above my pay grade) Sorry. A responsible gun owner may have to take one for the team and be little less selfish. Because, when too many are irresponsible it spoils it for all. I understand that people have rights, no reason to hide be hide them. This isn't the stand that needs to be made so all our other rights hold. We are beyond that stage. Maybe this is where we disagree. I am simply not that primal. Call me naive, that's fine. So where does it stop? Will I be restricted on what I can eat because irresponsible people eat themselves to death? What I can drink because people drink themselves to death? What I drive because people can't drive properly and kill themselves and others? I could go on and on and you get my point. So here's the questions. When you say responsible gun owners may need to take one for the team give us an example of what you're suggesting. 42 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: My wife's mother is somewhat eccentric. She can be talking about something, and then, like a file you click too fast on a old PC, she'll kind of spirals a bit, look off into the distance as if to study a bug on the wall -- you can almost see the hourglass spinning -- and then she'll suddenly blurt out a word that has nothing to do with the topic. "Well, you know, when we lived in Covina, we had a neighbor who used to....(pause, pause, pause, reboot, reboot, reboot and then, suddenly)...MEATBALL!" That's Exiled in a nutshell. I don't know. I get the line from Covina to meatball. LOL
Recommended Posts