Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 2/21/2018 at 5:35 PM, thebug said:

They don't care about that. They are coming with bigger guns, more bullets and a good supply of body bags! 

Expand  

Actually, you'll never bell that cat.

 

The group of people you want to come an seize the guns of private citizens is comprised nearly 100% of gun owning private citizens, and you're asking them to shoot at their neighbor in order to infringe on the rights they've sworn an oath to protect.

 

Forcing on them the choice to kill to infringe on the inalienable rights of their neighbor will give enough pause that rights will be protected without shooting.

Posted
  On 2/21/2018 at 5:46 PM, TakeYouToTasker said:

Actually, you'll never bell that cat.

 

The group of people you want to come an seize the guns of private citizens is comprised nearly 100% of gun owning private citizens, and you're asking them to shoot at their neighbor in order to infringe on the rights they've sworn an oath to protect.

 

Forcing on them the choice to kill to infringe on the inalienable rights of their neighbor will give enough pause that rights will be protected without shooting.

Expand  

So you have nothing to worry about then? 

Posted
  On 2/21/2018 at 5:48 PM, TakeYouToTasker said:

Not true.  I have Communist gun grabbers to worry about.

 

Which is why I like to remind them that they can have all my bullets first.

Expand  

Like I said, they are coming! 

  On 2/21/2018 at 5:48 PM, 3rdnlng said:

Listening to the students speak in Tallahassee. One has found a solution. That "solution" is  "Never Again".

Expand  

They should not let students speak. Students are stupid! I mean, that's why the are in school. 

Posted
  On 2/21/2018 at 5:50 PM, Bob in Mich said:

 

I have seen a lot of your posts.  I think your neighbors would happily shoot you.  Just guessin

Expand  

Not likely, Bob.  See, people who subscribe to the philosophies I do tend towards community involvement and churches.  We break bread with our neighbors, and trust our children in their homes.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 2/21/2018 at 5:52 PM, TakeYouToTasker said:

Not likely, Bob.  See, people who subscribe to the philosophies I do tend towards community involvement and churches.  We break bread with our neighbors, and trust our children in their homes.

Expand  

Yeah, them church folk count on that! 

Posted (edited)

Once again the conversation devolves into mayhem.

 

I will ask again....how would federal legislation requiring a person be at least 21 to purchase a firearm infringe upon your rights? 

Edited by Rockpile233
Posted
  On 2/21/2018 at 5:50 PM, Bob in Mich said:

 

I have seen a lot of your posts.  I think your neighbors would happily shoot you.  Just guessin

Expand  

 

You should stop thinking. You've said yourself that you're not good enough at it to do it on your own. Wait for the professionals to tell you what to think, remember? 

 

It'll help avoid these little embarrassments. 

Posted
  On 2/21/2018 at 5:52 PM, TakeYouToTasker said:

Not likely, Bob.  See, people who subscribe to the philosophies I do tend towards community involvement and churches.  We break bread with our neighbors, and trust our children in their homes.

Expand  

 

Then you must be a helluva lot different than your online persona.  On-line you don't come across very warmly.  I wouldn't trust you to care for my fishing worms let alone my children.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 2/21/2018 at 5:54 PM, Rockpile233 said:

Once again the conversation devolves into mayhem.

 

I will ask again....how would federal legislation requiring a person be at least 21 to purchase a firearm infringe upon your rights? 

Expand  

 

There's obviously a place for reasonable discussion between reasonable people.

 

But partisans on both sides of this issue do not want that to happen. Divide and conquer is what we are seeing play out here, not a real debate about anything that will matter. 

Posted
  On 2/21/2018 at 5:54 PM, Rockpile233 said:

Once again the conversation devolves into mayhem.

 

I will ask again....how would federal legislation requiring a person be at least 21 to purchase a firearm infringe upon your rights? 

Expand  

 

it probably wouldn't 

 

but criminals will get whatever weapons they want do the evil they plan anyway

 

so this won't fly at all for 21

 

what age can you carry a firearm in the military or police services?

 

Posted
  On 2/21/2018 at 5:54 PM, Rockpile233 said:

Once again the conversation devolves into mayhem.

 

I will ask again....how would federal legislation requiring a person be at least 21 to purchase a firearm infringe upon your rights? 

Expand  

 

So an 18 year old adult shouldn't have access to all of his constitutional rights?

Posted
  On 2/21/2018 at 5:06 PM, Bob in Mich said:

 

Would religious scholars, in your opinion, claim the US Constitution was written by men or God? 

 

Assuming you agree that men wrote it and men have changed it in the past, why in God's name is the document so sacred that to discuss changing it again is so unthinkable?

 

I think changes to gun rules - not grabbing my guns or yours - could fit under the current 2nd Amendment language btw, but that is a second argument

Expand  

 

I never said, or even implied, that the constitution is a religious document, and I never said it's unthinkable to change anything in it. It's already been amended twenty seven times.

 

But there is a process, and that process prevents us from making on-the-spot changes in order to pass an otherwise unconstitutional law.

 

That said, I would agree that there may be room for making changes to gun laws without violating the second amendment, but I am not an expert on the matter.

 

×
×
  • Create New...