Jump to content

What is better, no guns, or more guns?


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 Kamala Harris once said police could pay surprise visits to legal gun owners’ homes for safe storage checks.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kamala-harris-once-said-police-133749431.html

 

Sorry if already mentioned, but she also said:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/harris-tells-oprah-any-intruder-her-home-is-getting-shot-2024-09-20/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, phypon said:

Phony P is back!  Somebody was throwing out an old fire extinguisher the other day and I thought of you.  I wonder, I thought to myself, if that Phony P guy would want that to weaponize that thang to knock around some Capitol Police the next time he’s in DC.   Here’s to you, cop-hating MAGA Phony P!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Phony P is back!  Somebody was throwing out an old fire extinguisher the other day and I thought of you.  I wonder, I thought to myself, if that Phony P guy would want that to weaponize that thang to knock around some Capitol Police the next time he’s in DC.   Here’s to you, cop-hating MAGA Phony P!

TMI, dude.  Keep your spank bank collection to yourself.  Here's another thought for you, next time you're banging your wife, picture me banging your wife.  Good luck with that!  :flirt:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, phypon said:

TMI, dude.  Keep your spank bank collection to yourself.  Here's another thought for you, next time you're banging your wife, picture me banging your wife.  Good luck with that!  :flirt:

This is obviously weird, but it’s less obvious what any of this gibberish is supposed to mean.  I appreciate a good comeback, but this isn’t even remotely understandable.  When you’re not busy hating on cops and Haitians, be better!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

This is obviously weird, but it’s less obvious what any of this gibberish is supposed to mean.  I appreciate a good comeback, but this isn’t even remotely understandable.  When you’re not busy hating on cops and Haitians, be better!

Are you a dude or a chick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Also not funny.  And, why is MAGA so into junk checks?  Weird. 

Oh, surprise!  You can't answer if you are a man or a woman.  God forbid someone ask you a simple question.  So, are you a man or a woman?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, phypon said:

Oh, surprise!  You can't answer if you are a man or a woman.  God forbid someone ask you a simple question.  So, are you a man or a woman?

I have to say that it’s pretty gross that you’re so interested in the junk of an Internet rando.  First you hate cops, now you’re doing junk checks on strangers.  Very, very weird.  

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

I have to say that it’s pretty gross that you’re so interested in the junk of an Internet rando.  First you hate cops, now you’re doing junk checks on strangers.  Very, very weird.  

I'm a man.  That was easy.  Why can't you answer a simple question?  F*cking weirdo.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, phypon said:

I'm a man.  That was easy.  Why can't you answer a simple question?  F*cking weirdo.  

Maybe I don’t talk about my junk with weirdos who ask about it.  Do you talk about your lady bits with other people?  Probably not.  Because that would be weird.  Just like it’s weird to ask others about their junk. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

Maybe I don’t talk about my junk with weirdos who ask about it.  Do you talk about your lady bits with other people?  Probably not.  Because that would be weird.  Just like it’s weird to ask others about their junk. 

Dude, you can't even say if you are a man or a woman.  F*ck off.  You're def not a man.  F*cking idiot p*ssy.  You're a psycho.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, phypon said:

Dude, you can't even say if you are a man or a woman.  F*ck off.  You're def not a man.  F*cking idiot p*ssy.  You're a psycho.

You want to know way too much about my junk.  It’s very disturbing.  Keep your hands on your lady bits and stop worrying about everyone else’s junk.  It’s weird and socially unacceptable. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

You want to know way too much about my junk.  It’s very disturbing.  Keep your hands on your lady bits and stop worrying about everyone else’s junk.  It’s weird and socially unacceptable. 

yeah, whatever dude

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The ‘Common Sense’ Gun Law Democrats Don’t Want to Talk About.

 

Kamala Harris loves to trot out her talking points about her gun control proposals in campaign appearances, which inevitably include her description of them as “common sense”. According to Harris, it’s just common sense to ban the most popular rifles in the country (though she’s now silent on whether its also common sense to include a compensated confiscation component to her gun ban scheme). It’s also common sense, at least to Harris, to mandate background checks on every private transfer of a firearm, even temporarily or if the seller is well aware that the buyer isn’t prohibited from possessing or purchasing a gun.

 

Waiting periods? Common sense. Gun rationing laws? Common sense. Magazine bans? Common sense. Whatever a gun control activist is proposing, they’re sure to tell us that it’s only common sense.

 

There is, however, one policy that seems perfectly reasonable to me (and I would argue, most Americans) that Democrats are largely unwilling to get behind: increasing the penalty for stealing a gun or possessing a stolen firearm.

 

https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2024/09/22/the-common-sense-gun-law-democrats-dont-want-to-talk-about-n1226304

 

 

Going after actual criminals would cut into one of the Democrats’ core constituencies.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Going after actual criminals would cut into one of the Democrats’ core constituencies.

 

Not just constituencies, but almost the entire population of those who benefit from their patronage. 

 

In a very real sense, the Democratic position is to subsidize and reward domestic terrorism and criminality directed against their enemies. Criminal justice "reform," "banning" guns, narcotic legalization, unlimited importation of third world invaders, and a host of other policies demonstrate this point.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

The ‘Common Sense’ Gun Law Democrats Don’t Want to Talk About.

 

Kamala Harris loves to trot out her talking points about her gun control proposals in campaign appearances, which inevitably include her description of them as “common sense”. According to Harris, it’s just common sense to ban the most popular rifles in the country (though she’s now silent on whether its also common sense to include a compensated confiscation component to her gun ban scheme). It’s also common sense, at least to Harris, to mandate background checks on every private transfer of a firearm, even temporarily or if the seller is well aware that the buyer isn’t prohibited from possessing or purchasing a gun.

 

Waiting periods? Common sense. Gun rationing laws? Common sense. Magazine bans? Common sense. Whatever a gun control activist is proposing, they’re sure to tell us that it’s only common sense.

 

There is, however, one policy that seems perfectly reasonable to me (and I would argue, most Americans) that Democrats are largely unwilling to get behind: increasing the penalty for stealing a gun or possessing a stolen firearm.

 

https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2024/09/22/the-common-sense-gun-law-democrats-dont-want-to-talk-about-n1226304

 

 

Going after actual criminals would cut into one of the Democrats’ core constituencies.

Gun laws only target legal gun owners. The criminals don't follow the law by definition 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
×
×
  • Create New...