B-Man Posted October 7, 2019 Posted October 7, 2019 SEEMS EMINENTLY FAIR: Lawmaker Wants To Make Gun-Free Zones Liable If Someone Hurt: Bills would remove governmental immunity, make private zone owners responsible for security. If you make it impossible for people to defend themselves, you should be made fully responsible for their safety. . 1
B-Man Posted October 7, 2019 Posted October 7, 2019 THIS IS NOT AN ACCIDENT: States Are Depriving Innocent People of Their Second Amendment Rights: “Red flag” laws leave gun owners defenseless. .
ExiledInIllinois Posted October 17, 2019 Posted October 17, 2019 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: You gun loons are grossly over-paranoid, self-centered, and over-sell yourself. Big government doesn't need to take your firearms away from you to disarm you. Here is proof. This is how Big Government will disarm you. Nobody is taking your guns away, they are taking you away:
B-Man Posted November 5, 2019 Posted November 5, 2019 GOOD: New Zealand’s Gun Confiscation Shaping Up To Be Massive Failure. . 1 1
3rdnlng Posted November 11, 2019 Posted November 11, 2019 32 minutes ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said: That triggers me.
Koko78 Posted November 11, 2019 Posted November 11, 2019 1 hour ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said: Does she have a permit for those? I may have to personally inspect to make sure they're in full compliance with the law. The rifle she is holding is nice too.
/dev/null Posted November 11, 2019 Posted November 11, 2019 2 hours ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said: Why would anyone want to ban those high capacity magazines?
3rdnlng Posted November 11, 2019 Posted November 11, 2019 20 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Does she have a permit for those? I may have to personally inspect to make sure they're in full compliance with the law. The rifle she is holding is nice too. You over officious jerk you! Those works of art deserve to push the envelope.
Koko78 Posted November 11, 2019 Posted November 11, 2019 12 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: You over officious jerk you! Those works of art deserve to push the envelope. Sometimes you just have to ask the tough questions and make the tough calls, after a thorough hands-on inspection (of course.) I will shoulder this heavy burden, in the interests of justice being done. 1
Gary M Posted November 11, 2019 Posted November 11, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said: I love large capacity magazines !!!!!! Edited November 11, 2019 by Gary M
Golden Goat Posted November 11, 2019 Posted November 11, 2019 Bernie: “Any law that is not followed or flagrantly abused, there have to be consequences or else there is no respect for the law," he said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." He was talking about guns. Those immigration laws; however -- apples and oranges, man!!! ? 1
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted November 12, 2019 Posted November 12, 2019 Court allows Sandy Hook parents to sue Remington for the murder of their children
Nanker Posted November 12, 2019 Posted November 12, 2019 Democrats have zero respect for laws and law enforcement. They only respect people who ***** on our culture and seek its downfall.
IDBillzFan Posted November 12, 2019 Posted November 12, 2019 21 hours ago, Golden Goat said: Bernie: “Any law that is not followed or flagrantly abused, there have to be consequences or else there is no respect for the law," he said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." He was talking about guns. Those immigration laws; however -- apples and oranges, man!!! ? The only reason Bernie doesn't sound like he's suffering from dementia is because he's running against Biden.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted November 12, 2019 Posted November 12, 2019 This is the Supreme Court that was suppose to do Conservatives bidding ?? Yes! The Supreme Court has denied Remington Arms Co.'s bid to block a lawsuit filed by families of victims of the Sandy Hook school massacre. The families say Remington should be held liable, as the maker and promoter of the AR-15-style rifle used in the 2012 killings. The court opted not to hear the gun-maker's appeal, in a decision that was announced Tuesday morning. The justices did not include any comment about the case, Remington Arms Co. v. Soto, as they turned it away. Remington had appealed to the highest federal court after the Connecticut Supreme Court allowed the Sandy Hook lawsuit to proceed in March. In recent court filings, Remington says the case "presents a nationally important question" about U.S. gun laws — namely, how to interpret the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which grants broad immunity to gun-makers and dealers from prosecution over crimes committed with their products. https://www.npr.org/2019/11/12/778487920/supreme-court-allows-sandy-hook-families-case-against-remington-to-proceed
Deranged Rhino Posted November 12, 2019 Posted November 12, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: This is the Supreme Court that was suppose to do Conservatives bidding No, it's not. Never was supposed to. That's the talking point pushed by the proven liars you have sworn fealty to.
Recommended Posts