B-Man Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Tiberius said: This is the ad, I guess the Republicans have to make a Latina women the evil one so that all the old people receiving socialist benefits can be afraid of socialism. This ad is so ignorant 12 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: Almost as ignorant as the post above yours If you two buffoons would read something you would have learned that the ad was not from the GOP and certainly was not racist, But keep on parroting your dem points 4 hours ago, B-Man said: Melting DOWN: AOC TOTALLY missed the point of New Faces GOP ad and her tweets shrieking about RACISM prove it ABC apparently ran an ad for New Faces GOP that some on the Left found objectionable. In other words, New Faces GOP ran a brutally honest ad about the dangers of socialism and Lefties lost their freakin’ minds over it. Here’s the ad: Basically socialism sucks. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, whether she likes it or not, has become the face of Socialist Democrats aka socialism. And speaking of AOC, she clearly missed the point of the ad because she not only thinks Republicans ran it (they didn’t) but she also seems to think it was about racism and pandering to white supremacists. Elizabeth Heng, who is neither white nor a white supremacist nor a man nor representative of the GOP, addressed AOC directly: Elizabeth Heng ✔@ElizabethHeng Not Republicans. Me. Are you really calling me a racist @aoc? I’m calling all Democrats out for supporting an evil ideology. Or are you just in Congress to hang out with celebrities and tweet out ridiculous ideas like the green new deal? https://twitter.com/aoc/status/1172323323641905165 … A Cambodian woman makes an ad highlighting the Cambodian Genocide/the horrors of socialism and @AOC has the audacity to call it "racist?"Instead of responding to the content of the ad, #BoycottABC is now trying to bully tv networks into not running it. Wonder why that is? Edited September 13, 2019 by B-Man 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 Just imagine what position he'll flip to when he learns he can't win a seat in the Senate either... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 Oh Horse crap, you can democracy will lead to the re-opening of the African Slave Trade in the same way. It's just a stupid argument. It's a Trumpian Argument. Just stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 I might just buy stock in some gunmakers and vote Democrat. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Just imagine what position he'll flip to when he learns he can't win a seat in the Senate either... I know, why would Mexican Americans in Texas support this guy?? Oh wait, that's right, some right wing terrorist just tried to murder them with that weapon. You forgot that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Oh Horse crap, you can democracy will lead to the re-opening of the African Slave Trade in the same way. You can? Go for it. I want to hear this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 15 minutes ago, B-Man said: If you two buffoons would read something you would have learned that the ad was not from the GOP and certainly was not racist, But keep on parroting your dem points Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You can? Go for it. I want to hear this... America allowed slavery, therefore Democracy is slavery! Fire, flames and all that, done Just now, Deranged Rhino said: How is she supporting genocide? This is all so stupid. Trump's people are sure desperate! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 Tibs: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 This thread is making me think I need to buy a house with land and start growing my own food soon. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrober38 Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 57 minutes ago, Chandemonium said: I assumed we were talking .223 since this is an AR conversation and that’s the most popular AR chambering. My point remains that Beto thinks the round itself is too powerful for civilians to own, and yet you think even more powerful cartridges will be exempt from banning or confiscation. How do you reconcile that? I thought you were talking about a different round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 10 minutes ago, Tiberius said: How is she supporting genocide? This is all so stupid. Wait, are you telling the board that you posted this 45 minutes ago, Tiberius said: This is the ad, I guess the Republicans have to make a Latina women the evil one so that all the old people receiving socialist benefits can be afraid of socialism. This ad is so ignorant and you don't understand how the Cambodian author could reference Genocide. Did you even watch the ad, or did you post it assuming "republican Bias" sight unseen. either way it's classic Gator ignorance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 11 minutes ago, B-Man said: Wait, are you telling the board that you posted this and you don't understand how the Cambodian author could reference Genocide. Did you even watch the ad, or did you post it assuming "republican Bias" sight unseen. either way it's classic Gator ignorance. So AOC is for genocide? You guys are still living off the Pizzagate high you guys got from that one. Ignorant as hell. Can't wait until Trump loses and you cry like a little soiled diaper baby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 Another typical Tibsy response. You write out "A" and he replies with "so you mean B"...............................................hilarious. Meanwhile HIS POSITION HAS EVOLVED: Presidential Candidate O’Rourke And Texas Senate Candidate O’Rourke Disagree On AR-15 Ownership. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Another typical Tibsy response. You write out "A" and he replies with "so you mean B"...............................................hilarious. Meanwhile HIS POSITION HAS EVOLVED: Presidential Candidate O’Rourke And Texas Senate Candidate O’Rourke Disagree On AR-15 Ownership. . I can see a gunfight breaking out between the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 THEY’RE UPSET BECAUSE ONLY LEFTISTS ARE SUPPOSED TO THREATEN VIOLENCE IF THEY DON’T GET THEIR WAY: New Republic: Conservatives: We’ll Spill Blood to Keep Our Guns. “‘There would be violence’ neatly elides what’s actually being claimed: Some gun-rights activists would murder government officials who try to enforce a duly passed law. This isn’t an extreme viewpoint among such gun enthusiasts. If anything, it’s one of their central tenets.” What part of Molon Labe don’t you get? Well, probably all of it, given today’s dismal education system. And a law that violates the Constitution — which gun confiscation absolutely would — isn’t a “duly passed law.” It’s a usurpation of authority. Funny that all these people who have been yammering about #Resistance and punching Nazis seem okay with the idea of laws that violate the Constitution, laws that are — of course — themselves enforced with guns and violence. But should it come to that, which I doubt, I suspect it wouldn’t be the cops and troops enforcing this who would be targeted first. UPDATE: A friend on Facebook comments: Oh, good, you finally understand. I thought we were going to have to explain it to you using small words and simple pictograms. It’s so tedious trying to explain the facts of life to the sort of dumbasses who think “shall not be infringed” means “maybe you could have a duck gun. If your doctor, your wife, and three of your neighbors agree.” Harsh, but fair. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 5 hours ago, B-Man said: THEY’RE UPSET BECAUSE ONLY LEFTISTS ARE SUPPOSED TO THREATEN VIOLENCE IF THEY DON’T GET THEIR WAY: New Republic: Conservatives: We’ll Spill Blood to Keep Our Guns. “‘There would be violence’ neatly elides what’s actually being claimed: Some gun-rights activists would murder government officials who try to enforce a duly passed law. This isn’t an extreme viewpoint among such gun enthusiasts. If anything, it’s one of their central tenets.” What part of Molon Labe don’t you get? Well, probably all of it, given today’s dismal education system. And a law that violates the Constitution — which gun confiscation absolutely would — isn’t a “duly passed law.” It’s a usurpation of authority. Funny that all these people who have been yammering about #Resistance and punching Nazis seem okay with the idea of laws that violate the Constitution, laws that are — of course — themselves enforced with guns and violence. But should it come to that, which I doubt, I suspect it wouldn’t be the cops and troops enforcing this who would be targeted first. UPDATE: A friend on Facebook comments: Oh, good, you finally understand. I thought we were going to have to explain it to you using small words and simple pictograms. It’s so tedious trying to explain the facts of life to the sort of dumbasses who think “shall not be infringed” means “maybe you could have a duck gun. If your doctor, your wife, and three of your neighbors agree.” Harsh, but fair. . I can all but guarantee you that it will not be the police that attempt to confiscate weapons. Most are firm believers in the 2nd Amendment and, no matter what orders given, would not participate. The military on the other hand...... This country is heading for the bloodiest of all civil wars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 A gun is n assault weapon A knife is an assault weapon A baseball bat is an assault weapon A fist is an assault weapon Ban all of these? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdutton Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 4 minutes ago, Wacka said: A gun is n assault weapon A knife is an assault weapon A baseball bat is an assault weapon A fist is an assault weapon Ban all of these? Knives kill more people than ar-15's. We should definitely ban those. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 Beto Is a Disaster for the Gun-Control Movement by Charles C. W. Cooke Original Article Democrats Finally Fly Their Gun-Control Fascist Freak Flag in the Open by Stephen Kruiser Original Article . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts