truth on hold Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 (edited) In truth, we all figured that out, at the very latest, with "The World Jewish Congress declared war on Germany in 1933!!!" many newspapers and even Jewish leaders used the term "war" .... Google it. But call it what you will: war, economic boycott, whatever...goal was to starve the Nazi party. And according to TTT's mantra of total eradication of the enemy, holocaust was justified. He's got a sick mind. But given the hypocrisy with some here, its cool as long as it's applied to palis-only Edited July 11, 2014 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 Let's start with the fact that the World Jewish Congress was founded in 1936, and go from there. Retard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 Let's start with the fact that the World Jewish Congress was founded in 1936, and go from there. Retard. The First Preparatory World Jewish Conference was held in Geneva in August 1932 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 Let's start with the fact that the World Jewish Congress was founded in 1936, and go from there. Retard. Now you are signing your posts with your name? Retard is a funny name, but is that what you want us to call you from now on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 (edited) The First Preparatory World Jewish Conference was held in Geneva in August 1932 Right, but they weren't even a sanctioning body of any sort at that point. They were not a nation state, nor were they representitive of a national identity. They did not possess a military, have an economy, or hold any territory. They were nothing more than a glorified social group on a college campus. They had no power, no authority, and no law. They weren't even a think tank. They were discussing founding a think tank. Edited July 11, 2014 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 yes, because that is clearly a validated method of measuring intellect. You know the old Potter Stewart saying, right? I think that applies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 (edited) Right, but they weren't even a sanctioning body of any sort at that point. They were not a nation state, nor were they representitive of a national identity. They did not possess a military, have an economy, or hold any territory. They were nothing more than a glorified social group on a college campus. They had no power, no authority, and no law. They weren't even a think tank. They were discussing founding a think tank. There's no point debating what they were or weren't. Their goal was to represent world Jewry and they instigated economic boycotts of Nazi Germany. Just like with the palis you want to "drive all of them in the sea" for the actions of some of them. Say hello to Adolph's logic And by the way palis don't technically have a state either ... not in any true way. So the nation state distinction you're trying to make further weakens your argument Edited July 11, 2014 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 There's no point debating what they were or weren't. Their goal was to represent world Jewry and they instigated economic boycotts of Nazi Germany. Just like with the palis you want to "drive all of them in the sea" for the actions of some of them. Say hello to Adolph's logic So by your logic, Hitler implemented the Final Solution in 1940's because he was threatened by the World Jewish Congress in 1933? You're an idiot ™ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 You know the old Potter Stewart saying, right? I think that applies "i know it when i see it"? he was arrogantly talking about pornography but i think it applies well here in regards to apartheid. now, which quote were you actually referencing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 Hamas urging civilians to be human shields “just a fact” CNN’s Jake Tapper pushes back on former PLO adviser Two Videos, Two Different Universes The first is from Israel. A teacher composed a little song to help children cope with rocket attacks. The second is from Hamas. Videos at the link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 There's no point debating what they were or weren't. You're right, there isn't. But that's because there's nothing to debate on the issue. What 40 some odd Jews at a conference, holding no authority, and not authorized to speak for anyone at all, have to say on any issue at all is irrelevant. They can't affect any action. Further, a boycott of someones services or goods is not a hostile act. It's a peacful, non-aggressive, free market choice. Unless of course you're going to argue that an individual's choice to not eat at Chick-Fil-A because they don't support gay marraige is an act of war. Perhaps you'd like to make that argument, Joe? Their goal was to represent world Jewry and they instigated economic boycotts of Nazi Germany. Irrelevant. Just like with the palis you want to "drive all of them in the sea" for the actions of some of them. I don't "want" them to do anything. It's simply what they should do as their only moral action, given that the Palestinians are waging an actual war on them. Say hello to Adolph's logic Are individuals choosing not to eat at Chick-Fil-A because of their stance on gay marraige waging a war? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 Right, but they weren't even a sanctioning body of any sort at that point. They were not a nation state, nor were they representitive of a national identity. They did not possess a military, have an economy, or hold any territory. They were nothing more than a glorified social group on a college campus. They had no power, no authority, and no law. They weren't even a think tank. They were discussing founding a think tank. I'm wondering when Israel will begin invading universities based on the BDS movement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 http://www.theatlant...-crimes/374097/. the article is a step in the right direction but he just can't avoid using "but" in the end. israel isn't held to a higher standard. it's humanitarian standards towards the palestinians are abysmally low and disgraceful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 http://www.theatlant...-crimes/374097/. the article is a step in the right direction but he just can't avoid using "but" in the end. israel isn't held to a higher standard. it's humanitarian standards towards the palestinians are abysmally low and disgraceful. No one has claimed that Israel are a group of saints but they are more of a self reflective society than any other in the region. Compare that to the accusations of Apartheid or Ethnic Cleansing by some of the wiser posters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 it's humanitarian standards towards the palestinians are abysmally low and disgraceful. By which standards? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 By which standards? by the standards of decency and morality. brutally beating prisoners and teenagers is barbaric and immoral in any context. it's indefensible from an ethical standpoint. but i'm sure you vehemently disagree. there's no middle ground on this. it's either wrong or it isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 by the standards of decency and morality. brutally beating prisoners and teenagers is barbaric and immoral in any context. it's indefensible from an ethical standpoint. but i'm sure you vehemently disagree. there's no middle ground on this. it's either wrong or it isn't. You mean like sticking a plunger up a detainees butt, nearly ripping out the insides? Or beating up a speed violator? How's the air in that ivory tower? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 (edited) You mean like sticking a plunger up a detainees butt, nearly ripping out the insides? Or beating up a speed violator? How's the air in that ivory tower? do you aim for mediocrity or even inferiority in your job? do you aim for the highest standards instead? do you feel unfulfilled or disappointed if they aren't acheived? shouldn't people, cultures and gov'ts strive for the highest ideals? should they not feel guilty when they fail miserably? guilt has long been a strong suit for the Jews imo. it's still there even if repressed recently: http://blogs.forward...khdeir-beating/ "jews did this. blind hatred did this. we should look inside, and be ashamed" - from the rabbi quoted in my previous link. Edited July 11, 2014 by birdog1960 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 do you aim for mediocrity or even inferiority in your job? do you aim for the highest standards instead? do you feel unfulfilled or disappointed if they aren't acheived? shouldn't people, cultures and gov'ts strive for the highest ideals? should they not feel guilty when they fail miserably? guilt has long been a strong suit for the Jews imo. it's still there even if repressed recently: http://blogs.forward...khdeir-beating/ "jews did this. blind hatred did this. we should look inside, and be ashamed" - from the rabbi quoted in my previous link. And what was the reaction by Israeli politicians, Israeli public, Israeli media? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted July 11, 2014 Share Posted July 11, 2014 do you aim for mediocrity or even inferiority in your job? do you aim for the highest standards instead? do you feel unfulfilled or disappointed if they aren't acheived? shouldn't people, cultures and gov'ts strive for the highest ideals? should they not feel guilty when they fail miserably? guilt has long been a strong suit for the Jews imo. it's still there even if repressed recently: http://blogs.forward...khdeir-beating/ "jews did this. blind hatred did this. we should look inside, and be ashamed" - from the rabbi quoted in my previous link. Suffice it to say, you can't provide a tangible standard, and revert to the feel good morality. And coincidentally have proven again that you hold Israel to a zero-tolerance standard, when there isn't another country in the world that would be held to that standard if it were faced with a similar situation. Thanks for the daily affirmation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts