Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Bell is a UFA. My buddy says that the Steelers may let him walk.

 

I think I might. HE has an injury concern but has been a stud in the past as far as sacks go.

 

Fletcher would save us 1.6 mil if released. Set to make 3.8 and would have a 1.6 hit if cut.

 

Fletcher the past few years:

 

YEAR TEAM G GS TOT SOLO AST PD SACK FF REC INT YDS TD

1998 STL 16 1 12 11 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0

1999 STL 16 16 90 69 21 2 3.0 0 0 0 0 0

2000 STL 16 15 133 106 27 8 5.5 1 0 4 33 0

2001 STL 16 16 119 93 26 5 4.5 4 0 2 18 0

2002 BUF 16 16 149 108 41 2 3.0 2 2 0 0 0

2003 BUF 16 16 133 102 31 5 2.0 0 1 0 0 0

2004 BUF 16 16 144 101 43 4 3.5 2 1 0 0 0

CAREER 112 -- 780 590 190 26 21.5 9 -- 6 51 0

 

Kendrell the past few years:

 

YEAR TEAM G GS TOT SOLO AST PD SACK FF REC INT YDS TD

2001 PIT 16 16 82 71 11 1 9.0 1 0 0 0 0

2002 PIT 12 12 50 37 13 2 4.0 0 1 0 0 0

2003 PIT 16 16 100 86 14 3 5.0 1 1 1 61 0

2004 PIT 3 0 8 6 2 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0

CAREER 47 -- 240 200 40 6 18.0 2 -- 1 61 0

 

Fletcher is 29 to be 30. Bell is 26 set to be 27.

 

Fletcher is 5' 10" 245

Bell is 6' 1" 257

 

Do we go with youth and a better chance for a sack? or a vet who gets lots of tackles even solo?

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

the 3-4 and the 4-3 are diffrent systems. these diffrent systems result in diffrent stats for the players. it is diffcult to predict how a LB will do in a 4-3 when he has played his whole carrer in the 3-4.

 

fletcher is proven. why change.

Posted

i nominate this for "worst idea of the off-season".........ain't going to happen, nor should it.........fletch isn't going anywhere..........

Posted
i nominate this for "worst idea of the off-season".........ain't going to happen, nor should it.........fletch isn't going anywhere..........

217975[/snapback]

Did you see the "Henry for Fiedler trade" idea yesterday....? :)

This is up there...

Posted
Wasn't Bell a 1st rounder?  Good enough reason for me.

217948[/snapback]

you're forgetting - pp-era has to fulfill his quota of at least one absolutely drop-dead ridiculous post per day. remember yesterday's? that tom brady isn't very good?

Posted
you're forgetting - pp-era has to fulfill his quota of at least one absolutely drop-dead ridiculous post per day. remember yesterday's? that tom brady isn't very good?

218009[/snapback]

i meant jp-era (the post wasn't meant to read like snarky name-calling).

×
×
  • Create New...