Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Kiko wouldn't of won us any games this year anyway. The season will come down to how EJ plays.

The question actually may not be whether Kiko would win games for us (you are probably right he wouldn't win any on his lonsome. The question more likely is whether a lesser player like Bradham lose for us?

 

It would be stupid to simply give up after losing one guy but this ain't good.

  • Replies 479
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

Just looking at his stats again, he should have been rookie of year. Played the demanding mic position, played every down, 3rd in tackles in the league, 2 sacks, 4 INTs, defense made a huge jump up in ranks.

Edited by Joe_the_6_pack
Posted

Just looking at his stats again, he should have been rookie of year. Played the demanding mic position, played every down, 3rd in tackles in the league, 2 sacks, 4 INTs, defense made a huge jump up in ranks.

 

did you mean the 'mike' (linebacker) position instead of the "mic" positon? or is "mic" some football lingo i haven't heard that refers to the defensive player who wears the headset?

 

if so, the "demanding mic position" that you're talking about is the most stat-friendly position on defense . in fact, their inflated stats have helped middle linebackers to win rookie of the year 43% of years since 2000 (in spite of the fact that they make up only 1/11 = 9% of defensive rookie starters eligible).

Posted

did you mean the 'mike' (linebacker) position instead of the "mic" positon? or is "mic" some football lingo i haven't heard that refers to the defensive player who wears the headset?

 

if so, the "demanding mic position" that you're talking about is the most stat-friendly position on defense . in fact, their inflated stats have helped middle linebackers to win rookie of the year 43% of years since 2000 (in spite of the fact that they make up only 1/11 = 9% of defensive rookie starters eligible).

yeah because it's one of the very most demanding positions out there. your analysis of weighting them equally means that the QB position @ "only 1/11 = 9%" of offensive players, is of no greater value than any other offensive position like fullback, TE or left guard

Posted (edited)

Well its been 36 hours... is Kiko practicing yet? I mean, we don't expect him to follow the normal timeline, do we? Oh, and this is all a dream, right?

 

:cry:

 

BrQH3l4CUAA2pv6.jpg

Edited by YoloinOhio
Posted

You had hope?

 

 

Serious mistake. Expressing a different opinion from the acceptable norm. Why did you do it? You wanted to get banned? Well, did you?

What. The hell. Are you talking about?

 

Lighten up, Francis.

Posted
That was just a weird episode that made almost no sense. Just because a musical episode worked for "Buffy the Vampire Slayer", doesn't mean it'll work for any show.

 

If "Cop Rock" taught us anything...

Posted

The question actually may not be whether Kiko would win games for us (you are probably right he wouldn't win any on his lonsome. The question more likely is whether a lesser player like Bradham lose for us?

 

It would be stupid to simply give up after losing one guy but this ain't good.

Well said.

Posted

did some searching on how he actually got hurt and got nothing, anyone know exactly what happened?

 

Obviously he was upset by the Kolb DUI, and was following EJ's off season regimen.

Posted

 

 

Obviously he was upset by the Kolb DUI, and was following EJ's off season regimen.

 

Never thought I would have wished he would have followed Stevie's off season regimen... Hahahaha

×
×
  • Create New...