Canadian Bills Fan Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/06/26/as-claim-they-have-a-new-lease-which-could-mean-raiders-will-have-a-new-town/ CBF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
May Day 10 Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 lol if they move to Portland. Going from big fat guys in spiked shoulder pads and eye patches to games of hackey sack and drum circles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metzelaars_lives Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 lol if they move to Portland. Going from big fat guys in spiked shoulder pads and eye patches to games of hackey sack and drum circles Apparently you have hippies confused with hipsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmy10 Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 Apparently you have hippies confused with hipsters. Portland's got plenty of both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 Where exactly would the Raiders move too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I'm Spartacus Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 Where exactly would the Raiders move too? L.A. of course! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 L.A. of course! This would be just lovely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 No stadium in Portland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 The A's will stay as long as a new stadium is built on the current site not the waterfront. Wish that wasn't the case. A waterfront stadium in Oakland was be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Vader Posted June 26, 2014 Share Posted June 26, 2014 L.A. of course! And play in the L.A. Coliseum or the Rose Bowl? That won't go over well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 How ironic if the Raiders did move to Portland. What would that do to Trailblazers owner Paul Allen? He also owns the Seahawks. Would he be forced to divest one team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmy10 Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 The Raiders should move to Hamilton. We'll need a crosstown rival. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
major Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 Toronto Raiders? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
machine gun kelly Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 I don't know why Mark Davis doesn't negotiate with the 49ers and just share the San Jose stadium. My home office was out there so I've watched it being built for the last two years. It's in a beautiful town (Silicon Valley). The NFL has shown they can do it with the Giants and Jets. It also is cost effective as you double the usage of the stadium, and just share the profits. Davis would simply need to put up half of whatever Jed York did for the stadium. Just like the Bills LA situation, if the owner doesn't have the juice to fund a stadium, no team is going to LA. That state is perpetually bankrupt so they won't build a new stadium for a team. I still think it will be Kronke. He has the land, and I believe tied for second (Stephen Ross is the other) richest owner at a net worth of 5 Billion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris heff Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 I don't know why Mark Davis doesn't negotiate with the 49ers and just share the San Jose stadium. My home office was out there so I've watched it being built for the last two years. It's in a beautiful town (Silicon Valley). The NFL has shown they can do it with the Giants and Jets. It also is cost effective as you double the usage of the stadium, and just share the profits. Davis would simply need to put up half of whatever Jed York did for the stadium. Just like the Bills LA situation, if the owner doesn't have the juice to fund a stadium, no team is going to LA. That state is perpetually bankrupt so they won't build a new stadium for a team. I still think it will be Kronke. He has the land, and I believe tied for second (Stephen Ross is the other) richest owner at a net worth of 5 Billion. I've wondered the same thing about sharing that stadium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts