IDBillzFan Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 (edited) You got all that out of just a headline? He didn't read any of that. He was just posting what he was told to post...like a good little knob-gobbling statist. I'm not sure how anyone could read that article and not finally realize the incredible depths of incompetency this administration brings to the table. We're going to pull out of Iraq completely. We're going to leave no one behind from the US. We're going to let ISIS fill the vacuum. We're going to airdrop food to people who are being persecuted after we left them to be persecuted. Mission Accomplished! Let's roll out some more LGBT laws and go a-campaignin'!!! Edited August 7, 2014 by LABillzFan
B-Man Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 ISIS rampage: MONITORING THE SITUATION Southern border: MONITORING THE SITUATION Putin-Ukraine MONITORING THE SITUATION Fundraisers: ENGAGED Wolf Blitzer on Iraq: "This is not the way it was supposed to be after President Obama announced all U.S. forces were leaving" No kidding. .
GG Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 Wolf Blitzer on Iraq: "This is not the way it was supposed to be after President Obama announced all U.S. forces were leaving" Maybe more people will recognize what matters more is not how the US enters, but how it leaves.
Chef Jim Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 ISIS rampage: MONITORING THE SITUATION Southern border: MONITORING THE SITUATION Putin-Ukraine MONITORING THE SITUATION Fundraisers: ENGAGED Wolf Blitzer on Iraq: "This is not the way it was supposed to be after President Obama announced all U.S. forces were leaving" No kidding. . But it was the way many said it was going to be when we withdrew all our troops Wolfie ole boy.
IDBillzFan Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 Wolf Blitzer on Iraq: "This is not the way it was supposed to be after President Obama announced all U.S. forces were leaving" This would probably be a bad time to also let Wolf know that unicorns can't fart rainbows. One disappointment at a time, Wolf. One disappointment at a time.
3rdnlng Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 OMG!!! http://www.nytimes.c...av=lede-package This is serious business and shows that our total exit was not only foolish but naive on the part of Obama. Colin Powell was right in one regard when he said "you break it, you fix it".
DC Tom Posted August 8, 2014 Posted August 8, 2014 Obama to address the nation at 9:30 What's the over/under on how many times he says "I" or "me?"
Tiberius Posted August 8, 2014 Posted August 8, 2014 What??? I thought he was going to land on an aircraft carrier?
Maury Ballstein Posted August 8, 2014 Posted August 8, 2014 Time to shiv all these mofos https://news.vice.com/video/the-islamic-state-part-1?utm_source=vicetwitterus
Passepartout Posted August 8, 2014 Posted August 8, 2014 Yeah but it will be until 2017 when Obama leaves office. Have patience!
B-Man Posted August 8, 2014 Posted August 8, 2014 The jets bombing ISIS aren't American, reportedly, but Turkish. However: Obama authorizes limited airstrikes in Iraq: ‘We cannot turn a blind eye.’............ A day late and a MOAB short, but better than nothing. Don't forget, on December 14, 2011, President Barack Obama said the United States was “leaving behind a sovereign, stable and self-reliant Iraq" .
/dev/null Posted August 8, 2014 Posted August 8, 2014 Obama to address the nation at 9:30 I hope you had plenty of Kleenex handy...
GG Posted August 8, 2014 Posted August 8, 2014 I hope you had plenty of Kleenex handy... But probably a lot more lube and Justin Bieber pictures than in years past.
Nanker Posted August 8, 2014 Posted August 8, 2014 What's the over/under on how many times he says "I" or "me?" Only 10 "I"s and 3 "me"s. Now that's impressive! #BRING BACK OUR "I"s!
3rdnlng Posted August 8, 2014 Posted August 8, 2014 Only 10 "I"s and 3 "me"s. Now that's impressive! #BRING BACK OUR "I"s! Was it a one sentence statement?
B-Man Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 Fox, MSNBC Military Analysts Agree: Obama's [Lack of] Strategy Is Troubling In the wake of the news that President Obama had ordered limited bombing on ISIS mobile artillery units – a small hit with only two 500-pound bombs – experts were not shy about declaring their concern on TV about the Obama strategy. The White House won't commit to stopping the genocide by ISIS -- as evidenced yesterday when White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest failed to provide an affirmative response to a question by the press as to whether President Obama would take every measure to stop the genocide -- And President Obama has conclusively ruled out any U.S. troops going into Iraq, whether his strategy of very limited air strikes successfully stop ISIS or not. The disjointed, anemic responses by the White House is not sitting well with military analysts. Fox News Channel contributor Lt. Col. Bill Cowan told anchor Jon Scott that air strikes alone will not get the job done, and that at a minimum, non-U.S. troops on the ground will be needed, but that trained troops are not available from other sources. Meanwhile, over on the chief Obama cheerleader cable network, MSNBC, viewers were exposed to something they are not accustomed to -- commentary by a paid MSNBCer critical of President Obama, specifically the limited air strikes in Iraq against ISIS. MSNBC contributor and former Clinton administration drug czar Gen.Barry McCaffrey expressed his position to host Andrea Mitchell today, saying, "A lot of this doesn't make send. What is the mission?" He gave a similar statement to NBC's Chuck Todd, adding that the Obama strategy seems to be more of an internal political maneuver than an actual effort at gaining a military result. "These are political gestures using military power," he explained. "When we dropped three aircraft loads of water and food to 50,000 people in the mountains, now we’re striking ISIS artillery units, it looks to me as if a lot of this is internal U.S. politics to show we’re doing something." Read more: http://newsbusters.o...g#ixzz39rAqZc00
truth on hold Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 (edited) Read more: http://newsbusters.o...g#ixzz39rAqZc00 Fox "news" lol who cares What you and others fail to get is there are only 2 strategies that work: 1) total intervention/occupation (what bush did), 2) non-intervention/no nation_building (what bush campaigned on). 1 was not an option because our broke nation In crisis couldn't afford it. Obama's problem was pursuing a middling strategy that doesn't work . fox of course will make no reference to how the west's intervention in Syria's civil war created the conditions for the rise of IS Edited August 9, 2014 by Joe_the_6_pack
B-Man Posted August 9, 2014 Posted August 9, 2014 Fox "news" lol who cares What you and others fail to get is there are only 2 strategies that work: 1) total intervention/occupation (what bush did), 2) none intervention/no nation_building (what bush campaigned on). 1 was not an option because our broke nation In crisis couldn't afford it. Obama's problem was pursuing a middling strategy that doesn't work . fox of course will make no reference to how the west's intervention in Syria's civil war created the conditions for the rise of IS Joe...........why do continually embarrass yourself ? READ the article !!! Two ex-military experts, one on Fox, one on MSNBC, offer their considerable opinion that the Obama administration's actions do not show a more cohesive strategy. NO ONE accepts that "oh its just Fox News" Bull Sh*t anymore lazy, ridiculous response. .
Recommended Posts