Hillary's Campaign Kickoff

[B-Man]

WATCH OUT OBAMA VOTERS, HILLARY WANTS YOU, BAD: Clinton lobbies hard to woo Obama voters in a Huffington Post op-ed, “What President Obama’s Legacy Means to Me“:

 

 

FTA:

As president, I will carry forward the Democratic record of achievement. I’ll defend President Obama’s accomplishments and build upon them. I’ll work to get incomes rising for middle-class families, make college affordable, alleviate the crushing burden of student debt, protect LGBT Americans from discrimination, preserve women’s access to health care and reproductive choice, and keep America safe from threats at home and abroad. And I’ll never allow the Affordable Care Act to be repealed.

We’ve made tremendous progress over the past eight years. That shouldn’t be dismissed or taken lightly. Let’s keep that progress going. Let’s make sure no one turns the clock back. We’ve come too far. We’ve accomplished too much. We can do even more for our families, our communities, and the country we love. And together, we can build an economy and a country that works for everyone. That would be truly revolutionary.

 

 

So apparently, to Hillary, everything is just peachy, and let’s keep this good thing going! Yeah, that will work.

 

With about two-thirds of Americans thinking the country is on the “wrong track,” I’d say Hillary’s attempt to run on a message of doing “even more” of what Obama has done–and selling herself as “truly revolutionary”–is about as useful as teats on a bull. Bless her little shriveled, lying progressive heart.

 

http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/224698/

[reddogblitz]

WATCH OUT OBAMA VOTERS, HILLARY WANTS YOU, BAD: Clinton lobbies hard to woo Obama voters in a Huffington Post op-ed, “What President Obama’s Legacy Means to Me“:

 

 

With about two-thirds of Americans thinking the country is on the “wrong track,” I’d say Hillary’s attempt to run on a message of doing “even more” of what Obama has done–and selling herself as “truly revolutionary”–is about as useful as teats on a bull. Bless her little shriveled, lying progressive heart.

 

http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/224698/

 

This is obviously Hillary's attempt to attract minority voters. The ones who voted for Barack but thus far are not polling well for Bernie. This coincides with her calling Flint a civil rights issue. And goes right along with her Super-PACman saying yesterday that black lives don't matter to Bernie.

 

I just hope they realize they're being pandered too and played and don't fall for it.

[DC Tom]

 

This is obviously Hillary's attempt to attract minority voters. The ones who voted for Barack but thus far are not polling well for Bernie. This coincides with her calling Flint a civil rights issue. And goes right along with her Super-PACman saying yesterday that black lives don't matter to Bernie.

 

I just hope they realize they're being pandered too and played and don't fall for it.

 

When have they ever realized it?

[B-Man]

It would be hilarious..............if it didn't illustrate so well, how the administration feels about us.

 

 

‘Convenient!’ Gotta love State Dept.’s excuse for delaying next Hillary email release

 

The Hill

✔ @thehill

 

JUST IN: State Dept. blames #Snowzilla for delay in Clinton email release http://hill.cm/uOfzEqf

 

 

The State Department is super-serious about releasing more Hillary emails. And they’ll get to it, just as soon as the weather permits

 

 

 

Okay, Okay, It IS a bad storm, I'm being too cynical................right ?

 

 

More from The Hill:

The State Department on Friday sought to delay its final release of emails from Hillary Clinton’s personal server, blaming a massive snowstorm hitting Washington as well as an internal “oversight.”

 

In a

court filing

, the department

asked a federal court to delay by a month the Jan. 29 deadline

for it to release the last batch of roughly 55,000 pages of Clinton’s emails believed to be work-related.

 

 

 

 

Wait..............BY A MONTH ?

 

That would push the deadline past IOWA and NEW HAMPSHIRE......................

 

 

 

Edited January 23, 2016 by B-Man

[Doc]

Looks like kissing Barry's ass the other night helped Hiliary out. What a coincidink!

[B-Man]

DMN OpinionVerified account ‏@DMNOpinion 2h2 hours ago

 

Like other women, Hillary Clinton struggles against stereotypes and no-win |

http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/latest-columns/20160122-catherine-rampell-like-other-women-hillary-clinton-struggles-against-stereotypes-and-no-win-expectations.ece?cid=twitter_DMNOpinion …

 

Unlike other women, she exposes life-and-death secrets to our enemies on a private email server kept in a bathroom.

[drinkTHEkoolaid]

I am starting to wonder if Obama in all his legacy craving narcissism thinks Biden would be best to carry the torch.

 

If so, it wouldn't surprise me to see him order the feds to go after Hillary. With Hillary out of the way, Bernie who is un electable on a national level, who would be their new heir to the throne? enter noble genius Joe biden, convinced by his current boss to save the party, country and Obama's legacy.

 

It would be the ultimate Chicago style political maneuver.

 

He has already said he regrets not running.

Edited January 23, 2016 by drinkTHEkoolaid

[Deranged Rhino]

Hillary laughs when asked if she'll release transcripts of her paid speeches to Goldman Sachs: https://theintercept.com/2016/01/23/clinton-goldman-sachs-laugh/

 

Video included in the link

[Deranged Rhino]

NY Post: Sensitive spy information found on Hillary's server

 

http://nypost.com/2016/01/23/china-and-russia-likely-hacked-hillarys-emails-robert-gates/

[truth on hold]

freaking s@#&bag, this is a lot worse than bush pardon of scooter libby....

 

Bill Clinton’s pardon of fugitive Marc Rich continues to pay big

 

Fifteen years ago this month, on Jan. 20, 2001, his last day in office, Bill Clinton issued a pardon for international fugitive Marc Rich. It would become perhaps the most condemned official act of Clinton’s political career. A New York Times editorial called it “a shocking abuse of presidential power.” The usually Clinton-friendly New Republic noted it “is often mentioned as Exhibit A of Clintonian sliminess.”

 

Marc Rich was wanted for a list of charges going back decades. He had traded illegally with America’s enemies including Ayatollah Khomeini’s Iran, where he bought about $200 million worth of oil while revolutionaries allied with Khomeini held 53 American hostages in 1979.

Rich made a large part of his wealth, approximately $2 billion between 1979 and 1994, selling oil to the apartheid regime in South Africa when it faced a UN embargo. He did deals with Khadafy’s Libya, Milosevic’s Yugoslavia, Kim Il Sung’s North Korea, Communist dictatorships in Cuba and the Soviet Union itself. Little surprise that he was on the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted List.

Facing prosecution by Rudy Giuliani in 1983, Rich fled to Switzerland and lived in exile.

What bothered so many was that Clinton’s clemency to Rich reeked of payoff. In the run-up to the presidential pardon, the financier’s ex-wife Denise had donated $450,000 to the fledgling Clinton Library and “over $1 million to Democratic campaigns in the Clinton era.”

In the years following the scandal, the flow of funds from those connected to Marc Rich or the pardon scandal have continued to the Clintons.

Rich died in 2013. But his business partners, lawyers, advisers and friends have showered millions of dollars on the Clintons in the decade and a half following the scandal.

http://nypost.com/2016/01/17/after-pardoning-criminal-marc-rich-clintons-made-millions-off-friends/

Edited January 24, 2016 by JTSP

[B-Man]

Mrs. Clinton's Super Delegate Democracy
Townhall.com

 

Spare this nation President Hillary Clinton. But how?

 

If you think Hillary Clinton is going to be indicted for her illegal misuse of classified documents, you haven't been paying attention. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, appointed by President Obama, has discretion not to indict. She'll use it.

 

Want to argue that the Obama Department of Justice will put enforcing the law ahead of politics? Go right ahead.

 

The bigger issue, really, is whether Mrs. Clinton will be held accountable by voters. She put the people of this country at risk, and did so, quite obviously, in pursuit of her own selfish personal and political advantage. As Secretary of State, Hillary did our public business privately to keep her email from prying eyes at the State Department and elsewhere in that same federal government she wants to otherwise use to regulate everyone else.

 

Yet, very dangerously, her Westchester, N.Y., server and the information it stored were extremely vulnerable to capture by Chinese and Russian intelligence. And others.

 

It's now clear that numerous classified documents passed through her personal, private, "home" email server — Fox News reports "several dozen." Earlier this month, the U.S. Intelligence Community's Inspector General informed Congress that extremely sensitive and classified material, allegedly involving human intelligence, had been discovered on Hillary's private server. That disclosure led one former Special Operations planner to declare, "There are people's lives at stake."

Meanwhile, just last week the State Department announced it would not be able to comply with the court-mandated date to turn over the final 9,400 pages of then-Secretary of State Clinton's emails, asking the judge for a one-month extension — past the first presidential caucuses and primaries.

 

{snip}

 

Polls have consistently shown Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders besting Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire and a recent CNN poll placed Sanders ahead in Iowa as well. Clinton, however, has consistently led in national polls.

 

My point is that despite the fact that a majority of Americans don't trust Hillary, and even 40 percent of Democrats say "honest" isn't a good word to describe her, Mrs. Clinton will nonetheless win the Democratic Party nomination for president.

 

And that's whether a majority of the people who cast ballots in Democratic primaries and caucuses vote for her . . . or not.

 

A Done Deal

 

One might surmise that the Democratic Party would embrace democratic practices and principles, and, therefore, that the candidate garnering the most votes in these exciting caucus and primary contests we hear so much about would win the party's nomination. One would surmise incorrectly.

 

Let me explain: Democrats have a lot of "superdelegates."

 

These are party leaders, elected officials and former elected officials. In short, muckety-mucks. They're appointed to be delegates and get to vote representing the party establishment, just like the delegates actually chosen through democratic elections get to vote. Thankfully, there are only 712 superdelegates among a total of 4,764 delegates.

 

Still, thats 15 percent of the total vote. And why should there be even one unelected delegate voting to cancel out an elected delegate's vote?

 

By the way, did I mention that Hillary Clinton leads Sanders in committed superdelegates by 380 to eleven? She's winning the insider vote by an incredible 97 to 3 percent over the Bern.

What does this mean? It means that Bernie Sanders could win the actually voting in all the primaries and caucuses by a whopping 58 to 42 percent over Clinton and still lose the presidential nomination to Hillary among delegates as a whole.

 

That's not democracy. It's a fixed insider game . . . played to near perfection by the consummate insider politician.

 

Hillary Clinton will not be indicted. The DOJ won't stop her. Bernie Sanders won't stop her, either, even with an underwhelmed Democrat base flocking to the democratic socialist.

 

 

[B-Man]

http://nypost.com/2016/01/24/hillarys-team-copied-intel-off-top-secret-server-to-email/

 

 

 

I'm sure it was totally innocuous material.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Folks this isn't "Unknowingly passed classified material" anymore.

 

There is clear intent to circumvent espionage laws now. Serious business.

 

 

 

.

Edited January 24, 2016 by B-Man

[drinkTHEkoolaid]

http://nypost.com/2016/01/24/hillarys-team-copied-intel-off-top-secret-server-to-email/

 

 

 

I'm sure it was totally innocuous material.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Folks this isn't "Unknowingly passed classified material" anymore.

 

There is clear intent to circumvent espionage laws now. Serious business.

 

 

 

.

What difference does it make?

 

Just fit her for an orange pant suit already. Ugh she deserves to go away to prison for awhile.

[TakeYouToTasker]

The FBI will recommend prosecution on multiple counts.

 

The Loretta Lynch Justice Department will use it's discretion to not indict.

[4merper4mer]

The FBI will recommend prosecution on multiple counts.

 

The Loretta Lynch Justice Department will use it's discretion to not indict.

Society will continue to crumble.

[drinkTHEkoolaid]

The FBI will recommend prosecution on multiple counts.

 

The Loretta Lynch Justice Department will use it's discretion to not indict.

The only other alternative, IMO is if Obama thinks his legacy would be better served by using this crisis to get Biden into the race to carry the torch, make no mistake Obama would order the justice department in a corrupt Chicago second to wipe out a political opponent.

 

I guess it comes down to whom Obama thinks will further his "legacy" and commission the most Obama statues and rename the most roads, schools and bridges in his namesake.

[4merper4mer]

The only other alternative, IMO is if Obama thinks his legacy would be better served by using this crisis to get Biden into the race to carry the torch, make no mistake Obama would order the justice department in a corrupt Chicago second to wipe out a political opponent.

 

I guess it comes down to whom Obama thinks will further his "legacy" and commission the most Obama statues and rename the most roads, schools and bridges in his namesake.

 

Which is yet another sign that we are screwed. Somebody from one of the parties needs to channel their inner Harvey Dent. But they don't have one.

[TakeYouToTasker]

The only other alternative, IMO is if Obama thinks his legacy would be better served by using this crisis to get Biden into the race to carry the torch, make no mistake Obama would order the justice department in a corrupt Chicago second to wipe out a political opponent.

 

I guess it comes down to whom Obama thinks will further his "legacy" and commission the most Obama statues and rename the most roads, schools and bridges in his namesake.

The thing is, an indictment of Clinton, who served as SoS under Obama, taints the Obama legacy in the short term; and the long term harm it would do to the Democrat Party would likely serve to aid in the complete dismantling of his legacy over the next 16-24 years.

 

She won't be indicted.

[B-Man]

So Obama is hedging his bets. He is letting the FBI investigate, but on its own, without Justice Department prosecutors and the grand jury. This frees the administration and the Clinton campaign to be, by turns, ambiguous and disingenuous about whether there really is a formal investigation going on. As long as it is only the FBI doing the digging, everyone can play along with the farce: The investigation is very “preliminary,” it doesn’t even have “subjects,” and it may even be a Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy sabotage (in which, somehow, the saboteurs are Obama appointees and non-political law-enforcement agents).

I don’t think it’s going to work.

The FBI may not have a Justice Department prosecutor convening a grand jury, but it so happens that Director James Comey is a more accomplished government lawyer than anyone at the Justice Department. In fact, his own decorated DOJ career includes a term as deputy attorney general of the United States under President George W. Bush. Besides working under administrations of both parties, he has overseen prosecutions of both Republicans and Democrats. I’ve known no one in law enforcement more capable of navigating through a political maelstrom. Jim is tough, he is smart, and if there is a case to be made here, he will make it. And if he makes it, it will be bulletproof.

Of course, making the case would not mean the FBI could force attorney general Loretta Lynch — and the president to whom she answers — to pursue the case.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/430211/hillary-clinton-email-fbi-department-justice-obama

[Doc]

 

So Obama is hedging his bets. He is letting the FBI investigate, but on its own, without Justice Department prosecutors and the grand jury. This frees the administration and the Clinton campaign to be, by turns, ambiguous and disingenuous about whether there really is a formal investigation going on. As long as it is only the FBI doing the digging, everyone can play along with the farce: The investigation is very “preliminary,” it doesn’t even have “subjects,” and it may even be a Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy sabotage (in which, somehow, the saboteurs are Obama appointees and non-political law-enforcement agents).

I don’t think it’s going to work.

The FBI may not have a Justice Department prosecutor convening a grand jury, but it so happens that Director James Comey is a more accomplished government lawyer than anyone at the Justice Department. In fact, his own decorated DOJ career includes a term as deputy attorney general of the United States under President George W. Bush. Besides working under administrations of both parties, he has overseen prosecutions of both Republicans and Democrats. I’ve known no one in law enforcement more capable of navigating through a political maelstrom. Jim is tough, he is smart, and if there is a case to be made here, he will make it. And if he makes it, it will be bulletproof.

Of course, making the case would not mean the FBI could force attorney general Loretta Lynch — and the president to whom she answers — to pursue the case.

 

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/430211/hillary-clinton-email-fbi-department-justice-obama

 

Hilliary calling Comey a Repub conspirator was a bad move.